|
On August 16 2011 14:21 Jinivus wrote: MC is the only Protoss competetive with Bomber really. Bomber is like 7-6 vs MC.
That's the first game Huk played against Bomber.. He did pretty good, just didn't need to overextend and take a quicker third.
|
LOL Alicia tweeted "This is Protoss" after that game.
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 Velicia wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 14:20 vict1019 wrote: Camera flipped o.O, anyway love seeing the 6gate all in fail :D. Bomber tricking him out saying he was going for an ultra long game. Please explain to me what part of that game was 6 gate all in.
He made 6 gates, made an all out attack while not making probes.
|
On August 16 2011 14:21 backtoback wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 14:20 Cyrak wrote: It is really, really hard not to rage about balance after watching that game. you dumb? HuK Overextended with those bunkers and losing such a huge lead. He had that if he just teched and sat back
Actually, Alicia is saying "this is toss" after huk's loss. I like him and all, but he does so much qqing these days, its getting a bit annoying.
|
wutever huk shud roll through fifth set
|
bomber was simply much better at building scvs through the game than huk
|
|
huk lost because he was tweeting
|
I can't believe all you nubs got trolled so hard by HuK. It was common knowledge that this was pre-recorded if you payed any attention to things. -_-;
|
LOL
Killer's eyes wander right after he says he name
|
Wasnt SangHo's Artosis' room mate...?
|
On August 16 2011 14:20 Cyrak wrote: It is really, really hard not to rage about balance after watching that game.
How about getting good enough to understand mistakes made?
Huk was to slow on tech. No Colossus, no Templars. Not sure about his forge upgrades (as I did not pay attention to that).
To heavy on Stalkers. Seriously? I saw like 8-10+ Stalkers. Thats 125 minerals, and 50 gas per stalker. Zealots are much more effective against a pure MMM army (as they are also cheaper, allowing you to get more templars/colossus/sentries).
Overextending on bunkers after he thought he had the army lead. He could have expanded or sat back and tech'ed more and probably ended up ahead.
Point being, yes, Huk is human and does make mistakes.
edit: So Huk was supposedly doing a 6-gate+robo?
|
Bomber vs Keen. Really bad luck for Keen ((((
|
On August 16 2011 14:20 vict1019 wrote: Camera flipped o.O, anyway love seeing the 6gate all in fail :D. Bomber tricking him out saying he was going for an ultra long game.
pff there was no all in, just dumb extended aggression that lost huk the game. I don't understand why people love screaming "all-in" when they see an attack
|
On August 16 2011 14:22 TeWy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 14:20 Cyrak wrote: It is really, really hard not to rage about balance after watching that game. No-tech to colossi/HT = all-in You can't beat marines/marauders/medivacs with unupgraded zealots/stalkers/sentries and poor positionning.
No thats not what all-in means.
And he had a robo anyway.
|
Lol @ Killer's awkward side glance during his intro
|
i dont understand why huk didnt just throw down an expo once he saw all those bunkers go up. Throw an expo down and get a twilight and get double forge. He would have won the game easy but he just threw it away with an attack that he should have committed to straight away if he didnt want to expand
|
HuK only had a slight army lead, but once bomber made 4 bunkers it wasn't really a lead since HuK just didn't have as good macro and couldn't attack bomber.
|
On August 16 2011 14:20 Cyrak wrote: It is really, really hard not to rage about balance after watching that game. Let's see you do your best ^^ its not a balance issue. the better player won
|
Killer was roommates with Artosis? I thought that was Tester?
|
|
|
|