Blizz EU Invite - Day 2 - Page 42
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
jannis
Netherlands38 Posts
| ||
|
cablesc
United States1540 Posts
| ||
|
Worldatlarge
United States649 Posts
On August 07 2011 20:31 Worldatlarge wrote: It's called Marine/Tank/Banshee all-in, no toss ball to deal with. And here it comes : ] | ||
|
dooraven
Australia2820 Posts
| ||
|
Toxi78
966 Posts
| ||
|
TaoTeKing
France481 Posts
![]() | ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
| ||
|
PeggyHill
1494 Posts
On August 07 2011 20:38 cablesc wrote: Here we go. 111. Is it though? No tech lab on the fac yet, oh wait there it is. Stoked I called this :D | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9447 Posts
On August 07 2011 20:31 Xaeldaren wrote: Zealot/Archon is so difficult to deal with. I switched from Protoss to Terran last week and I was going Zealot/Archon in all my PvT. You really need something like Thor/Hellion to deal with it, bio isn't the way to go. Its strong midgame. But in the midgame you need to build suply deps/bunkers to protect your nat and 3rd. So chargelots arent effective. In lategame, when you get 10+ ghosts, archons are np, and chargelots get worse vs a 200 bioball. | ||
|
zeru
8156 Posts
| ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
| ||
|
BlueSpace
Germany2182 Posts
| ||
|
Eufouria
United Kingdom4425 Posts
On August 07 2011 20:36 mholden02 wrote: Terrans are still using Rauder heavy compositions and its terrible vs Zealot/Archon. Either use marine heavy, which puts a premium on your ghost play, or mix in blue flame hellions. But straight Marauder builds will not win. Most players aren't good enough to use mariners instead of marauders, even though at high levels they are better in almost every situation. | ||
|
Jakalo
Latvia2350 Posts
On August 07 2011 20:35 itsjuspeter wrote: Learn to check spoilers, don't spoil game. Its a live report thread, there should be spoilers | ||
|
freerolll
Belgium1056 Posts
| ||
|
Hierarch
United States2197 Posts
On August 07 2011 20:38 jannis wrote: isn't it more efficient to mine with 2 workers from 1 gas and 1 worker from the other instead of 3 at the same gas? I wouldn't call it more efficient since it's another 75 early minerals for the 2nd gas | ||
|
Dingobloo
Australia1903 Posts
It is. | ||
|
Horp
Sweden164 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
On August 07 2011 20:39 zeru wrote: its not 1/1/1 all in. its regular cloaked banshee. Tanks are coming...damn you Tarson. Taking a free win at a time like this :/. | ||
|
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
| ||
