EPT[GSL] July Code S ro16 Day 2 - Page 53
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:16 ShootingStars wrote: MAN ID PAY TO see huk vs NESTEaAAAAAA I'd pay just to see Nestea =P | ||
|
DeathPengu
Taiwan137 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:16 KiNGxXx wrote: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/LKlTT.jpg) OMG huk you look so sexy! | ||
|
Saicam
262 Posts
| ||
|
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:16 Hall0wed wrote: HuK looking pretty big in the picture. You've never stretched an image before?  | ||
|
hysterial
United States2044 Posts
| ||
|
Talho
Belgium592 Posts
give us another 16minute long 4gate please =) | ||
|
ThePhan2m
Norway2750 Posts
Huk is gonna CRUSH MC. MC is quite bad shape latly | ||
|
cENTRYZ
Norway832 Posts
| ||
|
Tantaburs
Canada1825 Posts
| ||
|
NewteN
United States179 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:16 Sc2Null wrote: beating alive(just came from code-s) and then beating killer..isn't something to boast that highly..albeit, if he takes out MC..(pvp lol), then he'll just lose to nestea in the semi's if not hongun. fkn clueless, srsly just keep this shit to yourself | ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/BlP1E.jpg) | ||
|
doihy
668 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:14 Pajegetc wrote: Huk has beaten Nestea before and that was months ago, Huk is vastly superior to what he was then. You mean on the prestigious ladder league? | ||
|
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:16 hugedong wrote: Huk has actually uploaded more than one replay of him beating nestea in straight up games. It would definitely be an upset, but I can see it happening. Was that during ladder matches, though? NesTea's acknowledged in interviews that he never shows off the strategies he's working on while laddering. | ||
|
Gagaro
France5 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:13 Medrea wrote: What a stupid comment. Obviously its not balanced cuz it would be 3 zerg 3 protoss and 3 terran in the Ro8 + Show Spoiler + :p Or : 2 toss 2 zerg 2 terran 2 random :D | ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
| ||
Aesop
Hungary11304 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:14 SxYSpAz wrote: I think Honguns play was good, and he clearly was just using an unconventional strategy that Tastosis didn't agree with, but i wouldn't say it was highest level either, mostly due to zenios part, who was clearly struggling with an awkward situation, but he was definitely engaging a lot when he shouldn't i.e. kiting chargelots and then chasing them back to their huge freaking army! he was getting free kills and then decided to push on colli/storms. teh fuck? It's not even that unconventional. I think it followed the general maxims from the "Chinese PvZ" which relies on efficient trading with blink Stalkers and upgrade advantage until you have built up a composition you can win with. | ||
|
BookII
Australia400 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:13 DystopiaX wrote: The problem with that statement is that the credit should go to the winner for playing better than a jetlagged person, yes, but it's not as impressive had they played the same player without jetlag. You're playing undoubtedly a worse player at that point, so while the winner may play well there's still the question of how well the other player could have done... Yeah no doubt that question is still there. But both players know tournament schedules before they enter and would know if they will have to travel and if they will have jetlag. In knowing this, I feel the accomplishment of the player without jetlag shouldn't be diminished by saying the other player had jetlag. But you're probably right, I can't tell people how to think, and some will think a player lost cause of jetlag regardless of them knowing beforehand. | ||
|
Insomniac22
United States907 Posts
lol :D | ||
|
TranceStorm
1616 Posts
On July 13 2011 19:15 cassurai wrote: cheering for MC though i like both because MC has a better chance vs Nestea. Since when was that ever a reason to support someone? "I want this player to win because he has the best chance of winning overall." You shouldn't be supporting someone simply because they might have the best future chance of winning. | ||
| ||
