EPT[GSL] July Code S ro32 Day 2 - Page 114
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
can we please leave boxer-related talk out of this lr thread. if you want to discuss it go make another thread and talk in there. | ||
|
DisaFear
Australia4074 Posts
| ||
|
instazZ
Australia106 Posts
| ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
Sc2Null
United States3754 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On June 29 2011 21:11 Fionn wrote: Losira vs. TOP in the Ro16. Should be fun! | ||
|
Ertu
Greece686 Posts
| ||
|
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
| ||
|
imkp
United Kingdom139 Posts
can the apprentice beat the master? | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On June 29 2011 21:11 Sc2Null wrote: O dear...losira vs TOP..winner faces Nestea/ensare ... no way NesTea will lose to Ensnare. (I hope.) :| | ||
|
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
On June 29 2011 21:11 babylon wrote: ... no way NesTea will lose to Ensnare. (I hope.) :| He has before. | ||
|
Rayansaki
Portugal1266 Posts
On June 29 2011 20:55 Sc2Null wrote: This was probably the most unexpected result of the GSL. -- Losira has the worst ZvT(statistically) mkp one of the best TvZ... --- Losira dominates mkp...i don't know anymore Losira is one level above mkp's skill tho | ||
|
Zane
Romania3916 Posts
If the master couldn't do it, the student probably can't either. | ||
|
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
EM! KAY! PEE! EM! KAY! PEE! | ||
|
DisaFear
Australia4074 Posts
On June 29 2011 21:11 imkp wrote: god I want to see Losira vs Nestea can the apprentice beat the master? Yea, I wanna see this too | ||
|
Seditary
Australia7033 Posts
| ||
|
RageBot
Israel1530 Posts
| ||
|
Isaac
United States810 Posts
KAY PEE | ||
|
snafoo
New Zealand1615 Posts
On June 29 2011 21:11 StyLeD wrote: They could replace this ZvZ with a coin flip, Losira as Heads/Tails and Coca as Sideways. I think it's more like Losira Heads, Nestea Tails and every other zerg is sideways  | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
|
Jehct
New Zealand9115 Posts
In terms of results he isn't even close to MKP's level; pretty questionable statement there. | ||
| ||
