EPT[TSL] Ro8 Day 2 - Page 49
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Arguing and whining in this thread will be met with the hammer. Please enjoy the games and keep this thread on track! | ||
|
MahBoi
Zimbabwe26 Posts
| ||
|
Greem
730 Posts
 | ||
|
Savern101
United Kingdom859 Posts
| ||
|
MetalMarine
United States1559 Posts
| ||
|
Roe
Canada6002 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 Denzil wrote: Because he's damn boring and plays a singular style. nobody else does that style, and doesn't MC do the same 4 gate every game? | ||
|
ZasZ.
United States2911 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:45 ambient_orange wrote: that observer(who plays with mouse on screen) is so distracting.. no one told him that?  anyway... cruncher is playing so amazingly.. wow A lot of people like that Hot_Bid does that. Helps to point out things that you might not catch normally like players being supply blocked or key upgrades. Hot_Bid is one of the best SC2 observers I've ever seen, including GSL, NASL (lol), IGN, etc. P.S. That's not a knock on the NASL, I love the NASL but the observing is pretty awful. | ||
|
Vundox
United States182 Posts
| ||
|
GwSC
United States1997 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 whiteLotus wrote: good old cruncher siting in the base till 200/200 realy boring to watchHe did a lot of harassing, maybe you weren't watching | ||
|
A Wet Shamwow
United States1590 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 Z3kk wrote: Why no gg from cruncher D: prob nani left before cruncher could gg, just guessing | ||
|
Spaceball
United States213 Posts
 | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38257 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 Integra wrote: Looks like incontrol was right, pheonix based gameplay in PvP really rocks the matchup. It just counters Robo, 4gate or 3gate blink will still rofl it. PVP is silly like that. | ||
|
Mortal
2943 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 Integra wrote: Looks like incontrol was right, pheonix based gameplay in PvP really rocks the matchup. no, it smashes robo, which nani was going. if you go twilight, phoenix's are comically terrible. RPS ftw | ||
|
Niruz
Sweden169 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 Shalaiyn wrote: Did Cruncher just force field? What the hell how did he win that game if he force fields colossi? He was ahead by around 70 food | ||
|
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
|
Shaxe
Netherlands590 Posts
| ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 Shalaiyn wrote: Did Cruncher just force field? What the hell how did he win that game if he force fields colossi? Probably just wanted to force the colossi forward... | ||
|
Trawler
Sweden382 Posts
| ||
|
Newbistic
China2912 Posts
On April 25 2011 03:48 Shalaiyn wrote: Did Cruncher just force field? What the hell how did he win that game if he force fields colossi? Yeah poor forcefields totally negate a 5 colossus 50 supply advantage, Cruncher totally should have lost that battle. | ||
|
Raysalis
Malaysia1034 Posts
| ||
|
insaneMicro
Germany761 Posts
| ||
| ||
