EPTOn April 03 2011 12:55 Rinrun wrote:
Idra deals in BM. So I guess you can call it standard pre-game sportsmanship.
Idra deals in BM. So I guess you can call it standard pre-game sportsmanship.
so true.
[MLG] Dallas Day 2 - Page 532
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Nabes
Canada1800 Posts
so true. | ||
Jman5
United States745 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:52 ihavetofartosis wrote: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lETBn.jpg) HAH! | ||
|
TheRhox
Canada868 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:56 Sleight wrote: Select 2-1 over Haypro T_T | ||
|
Sleight
2471 Posts
| ||
|
SC2Phoenix
Canada2814 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:52 Golgotha wrote: But even after beating idra, he still loses yes making it out of the 200+ open bracket in 1st place is karma biting him in the ass.  | ||
|
Turenne
331 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:50 seiferoth10 wrote: So you're saying Idra has never beat "some of the best players in the world"? I can see the argument for JulyZerg, but your Idra hating is pretty juvenile. I don't hate Idra, I hate his fanboys who attempt to demean the achievements of other Zergs in an embarassing attempt to inflate the achievements of their idol. Understand? | ||
|
dunc
Netherlands1105 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:53 Joementum wrote: GSL WC Spoilers + Show Spoiler + Sen got rocked by MKP. JulyZerg got owned by MVP. Nestea got beat by Dimaga Success, you say? The way I look at it, July was the only Zerg having moderate success because he came out with a new style, but now that everyone has figured it out, it's back to being owned every game. + Show Spoiler + Yeah, him raping all the foreigners was him getting owned. Seriously, he's a very good Zerg and he can play a lot of different ways, it's just some days he plays worse than he can. Like the first game vs MVP he showed how Zerg should be played atm and it was incredible. | ||
|
AzurewinD
United States569 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:47 DoomsVille wrote: Anyways, I tihnk there is a good chance IdrA was going to lose anyways. The colossi would have ripped through the broodlings. Those broodlords had minimal ground support (30 lings? dead in 5 seconds with those 6 colossi with upgrades). And IdrA was out of money. Personally I think he would have lost either way. But it would have been close. It was pretty hilarious though lol Huh? Did you see the replay? HuK had almost no stalkers, several sentries, some zealots and several collossi. Collossi die to both the corruptors and the broodlords, stalkers die to the broodlings (and certainly can't kill that many broodlords) while the zerglings mop up the rest. HuK even admitted in the next game IdrA had that won. It wouldn't have been close. | ||
|
CPTHammer.464
United States37 Posts
| ||
|
MuteZephyr
Lithuania448 Posts
A) Nowhere does it say only the person who talks first gets DQ'd. They both chatted. B) IdrA's was much harsher and verbally aggressive. (Granted HuK was being snide, but nowhere near the BM level of a "Fuck off") | ||
|
TheLight
Australia410 Posts
http://s3.majorleaguegaming.com/140-22322.html | ||
|
trashcan
Mauritania56 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:53 Joementum wrote: GSL WC Spoilers + Show Spoiler + Sen got rocked by MKP. JulyZerg got owned by MVP. Nestea got beat by Dimaga Success, you say? The way I look at it, July was the only Zerg having moderate success because he came out with a new style, but now that everyone has figured it out, it's back to being owned every game. Does a zerg have to win every tournament for them to be viable? Zergs are making it deep into every major tournament. Other zergs are wrecking players Idra loses to and whines about (see Huk). The point is instead of looking at himself and trying to improve, Idra blames everything else and stagnates. In Brood War it was cheesing all-ins (couldn't whine about balance in that game) and now it's this is imbalance, that is imbalance. | ||
|
Murdoink
Chile1219 Posts
| ||
|
DaRKMaTT3r
Brazil553 Posts
http://s3.majorleaguegaming.com/2011-dallas-starcraft2-champ.html# (Click on losers on the left) | ||
|
MuteZephyr
Lithuania448 Posts
| ||
|
AeonStrife
United States918 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:51 jadedpi3 wrote: MLG Rules state Gameplay 1. No Pausing a Game without Referee’s permission. If an issue arises that requires a Pause, Players should contact their Referee immediately. Referees may approve or deny a Player’s request to Pause the Game. Pausing a Game without Referee’s permission will result in a Warning. Each subsequent Warning that a Player receives will result in a Forfeit of the Game (See Gameplay Rule #18). 2. Players may not look at an opposing Player’s Monitor or projected screen. 3. Players may not chat in-game unless they are engaging in pre-game sportsmanship or surrendering the Game. 4. Players must disable Toast Notifications in the Battle.net options. 5. Players must set their status to Busy. 6. Breaking any of Gameplay Rules #2-5 will result in a Forfeit of the Game. lolwut? So what about those rules anyway Yeah, I read this the other day. The game should go to Idra. Rules are rules. Especially if they enforce sportsmanship. | ||
|
x-Catalyst
United States921 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:55 sHt_ wrote: How the hell don't you notice noone or your units are taking dammages at that level of play??? Not all of his army was hallucinated so his units were taking damage. In an automated mindset IdrA probably went for the most expensive/damaging units. (e.g. Voidrays, Collosus) HuK knew that, so those were what he made because he knew what IdrA would probably react to most. | ||
|
Sleight
2471 Posts
| ||
|
oGm`REM
United States870 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:57 TheLight wrote: LOL, MLG removed the second game idra v. huk replay from their website. http://s3.majorleaguegaming.com/140-22322.html Awe.. lol ~~ At least I have it :D | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On April 03 2011 12:54 Viciousvx wrote: Rofl so as the initiator Huk Forfeits the Match, and Idra Wins by Default. i can see the grin on his face already. It doesn't really matter, the group rankings would be the same anyways. | ||
| ||
