EPT[GSL WC] Ro16 day 1 - Page 49
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
Terrakin
United States1440 Posts
don't need to get defensive, the only reason I said that was for anyone who does not understand the term "drawn".. | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:57 mizU wrote: ??? There's so many other maps that terran can do that. How's that different from muta "abuse" and colossi harass? Name the other serious maps that allow a terran to siege outside the natural behind a ledge? Edit: Collosi would be stupid on this map as well. Maybe that's what the designers were going for, let's make a map that is easily abusable so that the defender is at a disadvantage instead of an advantage. | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
|
hsynneva
Algeria46 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:57 Terrakin wrote: not again, this was the first match. also no mac lol He lost yesterday aswell... | ||
|
labbe
Sweden1456 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:53 Jacuzzi wrote: Huk with top 3 control in the world... Mvp is obviously top 2. Really disliking the fact that every terran in the world is abusing the shit out of this map with tanks.  Are you serious? You are complaining about good tank placement? Yeah he totally should just place the tanks on bad spots on purpose. | ||
|
DaRKMaTT3r
Brazil553 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:53 Erionn wrote: Abusing the map is the sign of a good player. If the terrain gives him an advantage why would he not abuse it? People treat abuse as cheating instead of exploiting the strength of the unit. Thats smart play not cheating. Everytime a colossus goes up a cliff and shoot when there is no viking around thats abusing but in a smart way. Im protoss player and getting so tired to read everytime in this thread when a terran wins is "stim too strong", "terran map favoured", if protoss win is "Colossi imba", "amulet imba". Learn to watch the games enjoy and learnm something out of these wonderful players. Does the mods have to come and warn people every LR thread? | ||
|
Madest
Ukraine179 Posts
| ||
|
Nabes
Canada1800 Posts
| ||
|
BeMannerDuPenner
Germany5638 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:56 Risen wrote: Yes, phoenix would help a LOT vs this build. Destroy the banshees almost instantly (they're light) and lift tanks. Ground army cleans up the rest phoenix, allout gateway with upgrades, standart strong robo play all do well vs that. but getting nothing but some slow zealots and stalkers and donating units over and over is not the way to handle it. | ||
|
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:58 blooblooblahblah wrote: I must say, although i always cheer for Huk, his play so far in the GSL hasn't been very inspiring for me. For something who's unit control is suppose to be his strength, he rarely seems to engage at the right times and the right positions. I really hope he can improve for Code S. I don't see how unit control has to do with choosing the right time and place to attack. | ||
|
Losthorn
Georgia351 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:59 aderum wrote: Lol dimaga is for romania umm no | ||
|
Striding Strider
United Kingdom787 Posts
GO NADA | ||
|
LuciferSC
Canada535 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:56 imJealous wrote: Hi Sec Auto Tracking upgrade increases its range, though I don't know if MVP got it that game. As well as the range of Seeker Missile, Missile turrets, and either auto turret or planetary fortress, cant remember which one. Probably one of the most under rated upgrades in the game. Most likely not - haven't heard of an early build that incorporates Hi Sec Auto Tracking upgrade. | ||
|
Terrakin
United States1440 Posts
look at the thread title.... | ||
|
CrumpetGuvnor
Australia302 Posts
collosus beats it i dont know why he didnt get one | ||
|
Ethan7
80 Posts
| ||
|
Coulthard
Greece3359 Posts
| ||
|
Jojo131
Brazil1631 Posts
Am I weird?  | ||
|
Joss2k
Norway195 Posts
On March 30 2011 18:59 Madest wrote: Lol, "Smells like teen spirit" on strings yeah :D lol | ||
| ||
