EPTOn March 28 2011 06:18 Alethios wrote:
I have no idea who to root for here.
Somebody tell me what to think!
I have no idea who to root for here.
Somebody tell me what to think!
NADA - LEGEND!
GO LEE YUN YEOL!!
)[TSL] Ro32 Day 4 - Page 322
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Balance whining will result in a ban | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
NADA - LEGEND! GO LEE YUN YEOL!! ) | ||
|
ifonlyiwereawsum
United States484 Posts
| ||
ZeromuS
Canada13426 Posts
Im pretty sure this thread isnt supposed to include any sort of balance whine :/ | ||
|
TheRhox
Canada868 Posts
On March 28 2011 06:18 Alethios wrote: I have no idea who to root for here. Somebody tell me what to think! you're on TL.net should be easy ^^ | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
ROFL pure gold | ||
|
Mellon
Sweden917 Posts
On March 28 2011 06:15 Ancient.eu wrote: Zeerax qualified by beating other players with this style. The fact that he looked so bad in this series does not show that he is bad, but it shows how good Mondragon's response was, a type of play that other people could not figure out and lost because of it. But he did play bad tho. Both micro and macro-wise. Lack of scouting and reacting will lose to this, but any decent aggression will just beat it hard. He could've just gone mass lings and won, or baneling bust, or anything. He either needs to harass better (last game he almost lost ray due to miss-microing and wasting energy on phoenix on nothing), or by putting up any defence at all, not just 1 zealot/sentry. | ||
|
HuHEN
United Kingdom514 Posts
On March 28 2011 06:16 Omegalisk wrote: Mondragon's play was very fragile. If his drop/push failed to do much damage, he would have hardly any Drones for his economy, and ZeeRax could have taken a third and macro'd up to a Protoss deathball.Plus, ZeeRax didn't have very good unit control that game. IdrA did the same sort of strat on Game 2, devastated, and had tons more Drones than Mondragon. Oh well, still glad a Zerg won. He wasnt really throwing that many units at zeerax, he was just using them perfectly, and zeerax played poorly, I dont think that drop play was all in at all and it didnt need to do so much damage necessarily. | ||
|
Saniuslink
Netherlands77 Posts
[QUOTE]On March 28 2011 06:16 VarpuliS wrote: [QUOTE]On March 28 2011 06:13 lazyfeet wrote: LOL I'm convinced now mondragon is better then idra+ Show Spoiler + by a mile Dude missed opportunity there: + Show Spoiler + by a Smile LOL | ||
|
Eeevil
Netherlands359 Posts
Mondragon Zerg feels very BW ish btw....very awesome. GG | ||
|
ChiknAdobo
United States208 Posts
On March 28 2011 06:15 Iamyournoob wrote: Wow. So cool play Mondragon, even though Zeerax looked kinda sloppy sometimes. But, yeah it is nice to see Zergs play differently and find ways how to beat Turtle-Deathball-Toss on Shakuras - idra might wanna take a look at this. I did not expect this at all, but so far all german players have advanced - and I hope so will TLO! Idra doesn't have anything to learn from this game. I didn't even learn anything. Zeerax just played sloppy. If he wanted to use air he should have 3 gate expo into stargate or forge FE into stargate and both maps played well to those styles. Zeerax should watch Idra's game and learn from cruncher becasue cruncher used good solid standard builds and timings that are very difficult for zerg's to deal with. | ||
|
Leviance
Germany4079 Posts
On March 28 2011 06:14 VarpuliS wrote: ZeeRaX is pretty terrible. I've never seen so few gateway units. He does realize that colossi don't last very long if they're not in the middle of a deathball, right? Well he is a mass gamer, I believe 6000+ games, several times #1 World Rank, it must have worked a lot in games. I don't think he suddenly made up a strategy that hasn't any chance or chooses to play one which he wasn't successful with laddering against all the pros, Iess he had never a Zerg reacting like this It just can't be that with his amount of games played, he selected a terrible strategy, it must really have worked out UNTIL TODAY :D | ||
|
Art.FeeL
1163 Posts
| ||
|
Megaliskuu
United States5123 Posts
Nada! | ||
|
pontiff
Bulgaria73 Posts
| ||
|
Lennon
United Kingdom2275 Posts
On March 28 2011 06:16 Mailing wrote: No.... Mondragon looked so strong that game because his opponent made so many massive mistakes, that Cruncher probably won't make. CrunCher actually knows how to play SC2. ZeeRaX has apparently played over 4000 games and still doesn't know that you can't transition from air to Collossi straight away. | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
Well it says everything. To me Mondragon looked really unimpressive, especially in game 1. Will be hard for him next time he plays imo. | ||
|
vol_
Australia1608 Posts
 but its finally here! :D | ||
|
[GiTM]-Ace
United States4935 Posts
| ||
|
Rembot
United States137 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i51.tinypic.com/2dglufr.jpg)
