EPT[TSL] Ro32 Day3 - Page 128
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
rysecake
United States2632 Posts
| ||
|
Jinsho
United Kingdom3101 Posts
| ||
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:35 luckybeni2 wrote: And he was never really even A class. He was decent and mediocre but rarely played on top 20 level. I don't think he ever was top ten. Oh no...for a while he was considered one of the weakest Terran progamers and people were making fun of him. He did actually get a bit better in the last year of his BW career and actually showed some potential. His winrate never got over 40% though  And he was really more of a mechanical player if I recall correctly. Very very good macro, but not the sharpest tool in the BW-box | ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
Notice how Dreamhack happened wayyyyy before IEM and Kaspersky. IEM is the most recent. | ||
|
Kazius
Israel1456 Posts
| ||
|
cheesemaster
Canada1975 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:32 monkey5476 wrote: It doesn't matter what sort of silly logic you use: 400 ms ping is completely unplayable. 400 ms is really bad, but its apparently more than double that after the earthquake. Where i thought it was really noticeable was in the second game on taldarim with boxer his marauders just stood there while the zealots cut them up. Id love to see foreigners do well against koreans wich they are but with a noticeable disadvantage i think the TSL needs to change the rules for EU vs KR play 1 game on EU 1 game on KR one game on NA or something, or the higher seed gets more games on their home server. EU to KR shouldnt even be that bad anyways. | ||
|
Letall
Sweden384 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:36 dolpiff wrote: is it me or are Husky & chill a really good casting combo Its just you, they are awesome  ) | ||
|
Redmark
Canada2129 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:36 ftd.rain wrote: 0-5 on IEM proceeds to wins against a code S player, such improvement!!!!!1! lol you literally can't win if you're qxc | ||
|
alepov
Netherlands1132 Posts
| ||
|
SaroDarksbane
United States55 Posts
US: 9 EU: 90 KR: 256 So Koreans seem to be experiencing about 0.15 seconds more lag than Europeans. | ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:36 Kazzabiss wrote: Can't wait for that, it will PROVE that the Koreans are better and it's just the lag Kapersky, IEM, FXO anyone? yeah it will PROVE that koreans are better. Are you stupid? The lineup in the world championships for the foreigners are nowhere near as good as the lineup in the TSL. think think think. | ||
|
siewkeat
282 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:36 coddan wrote: Aren't they alternating between servers when people are not natively on the same one? So I don't see why lag can be blamed when it affects both of them. games played in NA for EU vs KR matches...it has been mentioned like a billionth times | ||
|
TheButtonmen
Canada1403 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:36 Scila wrote: Read the posts from reputable sources like FXOpen and other posters, which have said the ms is around 300-400. Except all the ping tests done by people in this thread are showing 140-160? | ||
|
Ulargg
Netherlands33 Posts
| ||
|
Kazzabiss
1006 Posts
| ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:36 eksert wrote: it's unplayable in x>150 ping in high level.. Doesn't Bnet have a default lag of 150 ms? | ||
|
TheRhox
Canada868 Posts
| ||
|
XiGua
Sweden3085 Posts
| ||
|
garbanzo
United States4046 Posts
Nice snipe on the natural. | ||
|
WingEn
84 Posts
| ||
| ||
