EPT[TSL] Ro32 Day3 - Page 109
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
sanya
482 Posts
| ||
|
Creighton
United States35 Posts
| ||
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:22 vyyye wrote: I'm not experienced with phoenix colossi at all, but wouldn't a Thor makes quite a huge difference if focused on the phoenix? It makes you really slow and then P just walks around you. Thors also blow vs range upgraded collosus. Plus just pure marauder/viking/ghost is an easy win if you can get a few good EMP's off | ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:22 MoonBear wrote: 22:00 Genius still going for phoenix. He has a small ground army but has 2 colossus. Qxc controls 3 of the towers so can see nearly everything. Missile turrets deny more phoenix harass. 23:20 Qxc with 2-2 upgrades on bio, Genius with 0-0. Genius finally with a third base but Qxc has 4 bases and 20 more supply and upgrades. | ||
|
CongoJack
Canada417 Posts
| ||
|
TheBJ
Bulgaria906 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:23 Dante08 wrote: LOL now the terran is outupgrading protoss  "must be the earthquake" can we stop with the silly lag discussion and enjoy the games...... | ||
|
Jinsho
United Kingdom3101 Posts
Right now the skill gap just isn't that big. It will increase as professional gamers in Korea and elsewhere take up their SC2 jobs and spend another year-two on refinement. | ||
|
Kazzabiss
1006 Posts
How? MC had a higher latency than Ciara did, and he still won That is a HAHAHAHAHA | ||
|
ftd.rain
United Kingdom539 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:16 Kazzabiss wrote: Even without lag I think QXC would beat Genius. Genius beat Mvp, yes (which is Mvp's worst MU by far), but Genius also lost to DAVIT, Rain, and Rainbow, all Cheese/Harass based Terrans, which is exactly like QXC, not Mvp Yea because qxc is as good as Rainbow, like evenly matched and all that. | ||
|
teamsolid
Canada3668 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:22 Kazzabiss wrote: No, that would be worse, because it would give the player playing on their own server a free win each time. KR->EU is even worse than to NA. So giving the EU player a free win for ALL 3 sets is better? As FXO tested, you get 400 ping (~1.5 sec) NA - Korea, while EU to NA is only 150 ping (~0.5 sec). lol what? | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19191 Posts
| ||
|
haegN
Norway533 Posts
| ||
|
A Wet Shamwow
United States1590 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:08 aoe2fan wrote: AdelScott probably play on the NA server alot for tournaments etc so he practises with it. MVP only play on the Korean server with 0 lag. How is that the same for both players? Thats like saying well MVP knew that he was going to play in this big tournament and that he would be playing on the NA server, if he didnt get used to the NA server, it is his falt, its a sad fact, but what would have been better, adel play on KR just because he isn't korean, or MVP play on EU because he is korean, it the best that could have happened. Not to say that it didnt effect him, but in all reality i would like to think that he knew that there would be lag. | ||
|
Lylat
France8575 Posts
| ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
| ||
|
TheAwesomeAll
Netherlands1609 Posts
| ||
|
vyyye
Sweden3917 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:23 Lann555 wrote: It makes you really slow and then P just walks around you. Thors also blow vs range upgraded collosus. Plus just pure marauder/viking/ghost is an easy win if you can get a few good EMP's off Durr obviously. Was only thinking of the straight up battle for whatever reason. | ||
|
WniO
United States2706 Posts
| ||
|
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
| ||
|
Grantiere
United States129 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:06 RHMVNovus wrote: I don't think I've heard anyone with sufficient ethos corroborate that US-SK lag is worse than US-EU lag. Sounds like a Rush Limbaugh-style talking point. Just an fyi, Root Ddoro did exactly that in the FXOpen thread yesterday, as potential explanation of similar "upsets" in that tourney: DdoRo Canada. March 26 2011 12:08. Posts 83 PM Profile Quote # ok, I talked to both koreans and european players about the lag issue. there is almost no lag for EU players playing on the NA server, but Koreans actually have alot more latency than it seems they have. two days ago, I tried to play with my korean friend on the NA server for 2s. he was complainin alot about lag, he's forcefield went down like 1.5sec after he actually put it down Also, in oGsMC's interview for TSL, he mentioned he went for colossi+void ray just to 1a, because he couldn't micro vs Ciara. Also, boxer and his gf mentioned about lag. We'll have a decent amount of evidence around relative Korea - Foreigner level and whether lag has a major impact by the time TSL is over. We'll have the results from multiple international tourneys with both onsite and online play to look at: IEM and GSL World Championships with onsite play, and TSL and FXOpen with online play. Until then we can just enjoy the games, and hopefully avoid throwing around irrelevant political names to denigrate a potentially legitimate position. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](/images/flags2/ks.png)
![[image loading]](/images/flags2/us.png)
