|
On January 24 2011 05:55 raidmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:54 whiteLotus wrote:On January 24 2011 05:53 raidmaster wrote: Wow. So much cs fanatics. Well non-fanatics know that cs is a nobrainer. why dont you go and creat a team who will win everything and make some money? cuz its so ez right That's the point. Making a team is not too wise, when game is so much luck based?
because theres a relatively high chance u will win something without putting much of an effort into it!
|
Quake is actually much more skill based.
|
while sc2 is more a game of tactics, cs is more of muscle memory and reactions. Noone can ever try to even compare cs and sc2 strategic wise.
|
On January 24 2011 05:57 CryMeAReaper wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:55 raidmaster wrote:On January 24 2011 05:54 whiteLotus wrote:On January 24 2011 05:53 raidmaster wrote: Wow. So much cs fanatics. Well non-fanatics know that cs is a nobrainer. why dont you go and creat a team who will win everything and make some money? cuz its so ez right That's the point. Making a team is not too wise, when game is so much luck based? because theres a relatively high chance u will win something without putting much of an effort into it!
And even higher chance that you will lose an entire money you put into it.
|
On January 24 2011 05:56 BasedSwag wrote: Apparently someone stole Naama's wallet during the break
wow? source? was it said on stream?
|
On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based.
Eating bananas is actually kind of luck based, whilst eating apples take skill.
|
So the sc2 finals will be after the ql finals, right?
|
On January 24 2011 05:57 CryMeAReaper wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:55 raidmaster wrote:On January 24 2011 05:54 whiteLotus wrote:On January 24 2011 05:53 raidmaster wrote: Wow. So much cs fanatics. Well non-fanatics know that cs is a nobrainer. why dont you go and creat a team who will win everything and make some money? cuz its so ez right That's the point. Making a team is not too wise, when game is so much luck based? because theres a relatively high chance u will win something without putting much of an effort into it! Quite sure I've seen that guy trolling more than one time, ignoring and moving on would be advisable.
Any idea how long it will be until SC2 starts?
|
On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based.
No it's not. If CS is so luck based, how come NAVI won like every major tournament last year? Seems like a game that's luck based wouldn't allow one team to dominate.
|
United Kingdom38255 Posts
CS over, thank the lord! Will happily watch a bit of QL though.
|
On January 24 2011 05:58 MaRkieMarK wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based. Eating bananas is actually kind of luck based, whilst eating apples take skill. Man eating around the apple core requires sick mouth micro. Banana eaters are such scrubs.
|
On January 24 2011 05:58 MaRkieMarK wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based. Eating bananas is actually kind of luck based, whilst eating apples take skill.
rofl n1
|
On January 24 2011 05:58 MaRkieMarK wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based. Eating bananas is actually kind of luck based, whilst eating apples take skill.
What? Opening bananas takes ages of training. At least for me it did 
|
On January 24 2011 05:58 labbe wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based. No it's not. If CS is so luck based, how come NAVI won like every major tournament last year? Seems like a game that's luck based wouldn't allow one team to dominate.
u do realise by looking at his posts that hes most likely trolling right?
|
On January 24 2011 05:58 labbe wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based. No it's not. If CS is so luck based, how come NAVI won like every major tournament last year? Seems like a game that's luck based wouldn't allow one team to dominate.
Well that how luck works. One day you win, one day you lose hard. Navi finished 4th this IEM.
|
On January 24 2011 05:58 MaRkieMarK wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:57 raidmaster wrote: Quake is actually much more skill based. Eating bananas is actually kind of luck based, whilst eating apples take skill.
Love it! And some people actually play both sc and cs.
|
My calculations pointed the luck percentage out
Sc2 is 22,45376453% luck while cs is 32,5643940% luck
now you know and may this discussion come to an end now
|
On January 24 2011 05:58 CryMeAReaper wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:56 BasedSwag wrote: Apparently someone stole Naama's wallet during the break wow? source? was it said on stream?
On Russian stream
|
On January 24 2011 06:00 BasedSwag wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:58 CryMeAReaper wrote:On January 24 2011 05:56 BasedSwag wrote: Apparently someone stole Naama's wallet during the break wow? source? was it said on stream? On Russian stream
ah. well that sucks=s
|
On January 24 2011 06:00 BasedSwag wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2011 05:58 CryMeAReaper wrote:On January 24 2011 05:56 BasedSwag wrote: Apparently someone stole Naama's wallet during the break wow? source? was it said on stream? On Russian stream
That sucks.
|
|
|
|