EPTOn January 04 2011 23:30 Mikami_ wrote:
So all protoss players lost T__T
So all protoss players lost T__T
there was only one protoss player that has played this season...
[GSL] Code A Ro32 Day 2 / Code S Ro32 Group C - Page 68
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51497 Posts
there was only one protoss player that has played this season... | ||
|
rezyn8
Australia216 Posts
On January 04 2011 23:29 jacksonlee wrote: Can anyone link to the page with interviews? thanks Interviews are on GomCam: http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors1/gomcam/ | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On January 04 2011 23:29 jacksonlee wrote: Can anyone link to the page with interviews? thanks http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors1/gomcam/ edit : oops, sorry :o | ||
|
ffz
United States490 Posts
| ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
Terran terran up! Wooo!  So happy with the results so far :D | ||
|
DarkRise
1644 Posts
| ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On January 04 2011 23:40 shannn wrote: Yea when only 1 protoss player played so far. Tommorow the Return of the Tester! ST_Ace lost in Code A as well. | ||
|
shannn
Netherlands2891 Posts
Ah I thought he meant in the Code S. Both leagues then yea I would agree all Protosses has lost so far. But Top was just better than Ace (looking at my LB LOL). | ||
|
bondafong
Denmark19 Posts
So far the following have advanced from Ro32: Terran 4/6 Zerg 2/5 Protoss 0/1 We onle have one zerg in the next two groups, no zergs in the following two and then two zergies in the last group. | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51497 Posts
| ||
|
shannn
Netherlands2891 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:10 BLinD-RawR wrote: Can anyone give me a rundown of all the games other than BoxeR vs Hyperdub(the only one I saw) Basically every game involving Boxer or Hyperdub were long games except for the last game I think. So basically all those games are must watches loool (this means no hongung games except 1st game between hongun and hyperdub). | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
In Sc2 Zerg is most sensitive to bad map pick. More maps are bad for Zerg then for other races. Bo1 in this setting makes this unfair. This season is going to see a record low number of Zerg players in Ro16, and for the next one they are going to either need to change maps or system. Only reason why there are 2 zerg in Ro16 now is because in Group B there were 3 zergs so one must have advanced (and Nestea was put into a group where he completely outclassed his opposition). I guess GSL people want to avoid Zerg winning any more GSLs so they have made this most stupid system. At least they could have made all Bo1 on a more balanced map like Xel'Naga Cavern. The LT IMMvp vs Cool was just stupid. | ||
|
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:45 -Archangel- wrote: I am sure this was mentioned but I feel this bo1 system is not fair for Zerg players. In Sc2 Zerg is most sensitive to bad map pick. More maps are bad for Zerg then for other races. Bo1 in this setting makes this unfair. This season is going to see a record low number of Zerg players in Ro16, and for the next one they are going to either need to change maps or system. Only reason why there are 2 zerg in Ro16 now is because in Group B there were 3 zergs so one must have advanced (and Nestea was put into a group where he completely outclassed his opposition). I guess GSL people want to avoid Zerg winning any more GSLs so they have made this most stupid system. At least they could have made all Bo1 on a more balanced map like Xel'Naga Cavern. The LT IMMvp vs Cool was just stupid. Meh, I don't see that it's any more unfair on zerg than it would be in a normal Bo3. They still play 3 games, so the chances of getting a bad map are the same. It's just the games are played against different people. | ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:45 -Archangel- wrote: I am sure this was mentioned but I feel this bo1 system is not fair for Zerg players. In Sc2 Zerg is most sensitive to bad map pick. More maps are bad for Zerg then for other races. Bo1 in this setting makes this unfair. This season is going to see a record low number of Zerg players in Ro16, and for the next one they are going to either need to change maps or system. Only reason why there are 2 zerg in Ro16 now is because in Group B there were 3 zergs so one must have advanced (and Nestea was put into a group where he completely outclassed his opposition). I guess GSL people want to avoid Zerg winning any more GSLs so they have made this most stupid system. At least they could have made all Bo1 on a more balanced map like Xel'Naga Cavern. The LT IMMvp vs Cool was just stupid. ... The system isn't rigged. Cool/Fruitdealer isn't as good as everyone thinks (he was better in beta/early release). You can't complain over todays games. At all. Seriously. Most of the maps are shit yes, gisado hints at GOM experimenting with different maps then the ladder ones. Let's hope they do something about blistering/steppes at least.. | ||
|
Heimatloser
Germany1494 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:45 -Archangel- wrote: I am sure this was mentioned but I feel this bo1 system is not fair for Zerg players. In Sc2 Zerg is most sensitive to bad map pick. More maps are bad for Zerg then for other races. Bo1 in this setting makes this unfair. This season is going to see a record low number of Zerg players in Ro16, and for the next one they are going to either need to change maps or system. Only reason why there are 2 zerg in Ro16 now is because in Group B there were 3 zergs so one must have advanced (and Nestea was put into a group where he completely outclassed his opposition). I guess GSL people want to avoid Zerg winning any more GSLs so they have made this most stupid system. At least they could have made all Bo1 on a more balanced map like Xel'Naga Cavern. The LT IMMvp vs Cool was just stupid. First of all: You need 2 losses to not get into ro16. So you need 2 bad maps, which would also fuck you in a bo3 Second: You need only 1 Zerg to win it all (which is NesTea) Third finally: Group stages are most fun and entertaining. They have many good sides, like not being dependent of 1 match up, 1 superior player or 1 bad map. Gom did it for the consumers and not because they hate zerg players, which, by the way, is the most stupid thought ive ever heard. We can argue that a complete round robin or MSL-style would be better, which i will approve completely, however. | ||
|
mierin
United States4943 Posts
| ||
|
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
Gom did it for the consumers and not because they hate zerg players, which, by the way, is the most stupid thought ive ever heard. It's not THE stupidest thought. Once on the official forums (el oh el) I saw a guy claiming that the tutorial videos for noobies were evidence that Blizzard purposefully made Terran OP. The reasoning? 'Listen to how they talk about Terran, like they love them, and see the difference in detail between this tutorial and the P and Z ones. Further proof that Blizzard is and will always be biased towards Terran.' I don't even think he was trolling. Off topic but awesome. P.S. Even though I don't really like the group play the suggestion that Gom is purposefully trying to avoid another Z winner is pretty out there. | ||
|
DarkRise
1644 Posts
i hope inca, tester, genius and mc will make it my protoss fantasy team <3 | ||
|
koppik
United States676 Posts
But yeah, I'm pretty sure GOM didn't design the tournament to spite Zerg players. | ||
|
climax
United States1088 Posts
| ||
| ||
