EPTOn January 02 2011 20:29 HollowLord wrote:
They should just copy MSL to be honest.
They should just copy MSL to be honest.
yeah they should...but they wont
[GSL] Code S Ro32 Group A - Page 61
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
yeah they should...but they wont | ||
|
NineteeN
131 Posts
| ||
|
Getz
United States559 Posts
On January 02 2011 20:29 ParasitJonte wrote: The logic is probably: - The winners of first games should have a chance to get 2-0 and just advance. - This format avoids three-way ties. Doesnt avoid a headache. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On January 02 2011 20:29 HollowLord wrote: They should just copy MSL to be honest. MSL's format was nearly as bad, you still have the problem of the order of the games played mattering since you don't play everyone in your group. Actually, how the fuck can you complain about this format and like MSL? They're so similar. | ||
|
Hunterai
Thailand842 Posts
On January 02 2011 20:27 shannn wrote: No. It's 1-1 now actually just that Polt's loss came from NesTea. So the 5th match determines the 2nd place in Group A for the person to advance to Ro16. Thanks, I wish they just say that the 1-1 players will play again to determine who goes through instead of saying "turning it into Bo3". | ||
|
De4ngus
United States6533 Posts
| ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
Only headache I have is how everyone complains about a straightforward format. | ||
|
NineteeN
131 Posts
| ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
On January 02 2011 20:30 De4ngus wrote: Who the hell though of this format......... I bet blizzard had some input.. Actually.. the format was really really simple.. then Blizzard got involved.. /troll | ||
|
Robstickle
Great Britain406 Posts
| ||
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
On January 02 2011 20:30 jalstar wrote: MSL's format was nearly as bad, you still have the problem of the order of the games played mattering since you don't play everyone in your group. Actually, how the fuck can you complain about this format and like MSL? They're so similar. why is the msl format bad? i can complain because it doesnt make sense to me that the winners are not playing each other | ||
|
Nfi
United States357 Posts
| ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
 .... They are giving feedback directly to the obs :D | ||
|
Pudge_172
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
"and spots the starport which we hadn't actually seen yet.." lol | ||
|
Deleted User 124618
1142 Posts
Less about making a strategy aimed at a specific player and more about actually playing well. You have to be careful to not to fall when enemy cheeses/all-ins tho. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On January 02 2011 20:32 TRAP[yoo] wrote: why is the msl format bad? i can complain because it doesnt make sense to me that the winners are not playing each other It doesn't matter whether the winners play each other or not as far as who advances and who doesn't. Having the winners play each other just guarantees that you play 5 games all the time, and GSL sometimes plays 6. The basic idea of both formats are pretty much the same. | ||
|
HollowLord
United States3862 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
buMf00d
Netherlands194 Posts
| ||
| ||
