EPTMLG Dallas Day 3 - Page 202
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Fingulfin
United States110 Posts
| ||
|
nvs.
Canada3609 Posts
Thanks.  | ||
|
nhoJJohn
Canada82 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:07 nhoJJohn wrote: They have the names messed up. Seems like TT1 is now playing terran and PU is going for the toss. Edit: They just removed it. Aaaand, now it's fixed. | ||
|
raidmaster
474 Posts
User was temp banned for this and other posts. | ||
|
cangiz
Canada286 Posts
| ||
|
Firereaver
India1701 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:04 Ryzu wrote: Thread spiraling into mass whining. Another quality LR thread. Its inevitable. Immaturity abounds without mod interference.. | ||
|
grevenchile
Chile118 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:06 HCastorp wrote: You guys realize that the alternative to an extended series is that the loser would have to win two Bo3s, not that they would play a simple Bo3, right? There is still going to be an advantage for the player who won the first time. The main difference is that under the extended series system it matters whether the original series was 2:0 or 2:1, whereas in the BoBo3 system it does not. no, this is a double elimination tournament, means you have to lose 2 times to get eliminated (lose 1 in WB and another in LB). thats why the winner of the winner bracket have to lose twice to be eliminated and win one to be the champion. | ||
|
oZii
United States1198 Posts
| ||
|
nhoJJohn
Canada82 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:08 nvs. wrote: Sorry for asking, but what was the controversy between PainUser and Tyler in their first matchup? I didn't get to watch it and there's waaaaaay to many pages for me to sort through to find out. Thanks. Tyler was about to win first game when MLG stopped it (13 minutes in) because they were on the wrong map. PU admits he was about to lose. | ||
|
unindel
United States206 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:07 I_Love_Bacon wrote: If we ignore all past results then that would mean for the sake of consistency you'd have to remove the winner bracket's champion having an advantage over the loser's bracket, no? If not, why draw the line there and not simply for beating an earlier opponent? Why does that logic apply there but not later? The difference there is that the player from the WB has never been eliminated from the tournament, whereas the LB has been eliminated once. In order to be taken out of a double elimination tournament, you should be eliminated twice. | ||
|
vnlegend
United States1389 Posts
| ||
|
Ryzu
United States369 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:07 I_Love_Bacon wrote: It's fair because it applies to everybody in the tournament as is easy to understand an enforce. Whether you think it should be applied is a different argument. Neither solution gives 100% happiness, but both are fair. Extended series: Avoids problems from a final series going 2-3 and the person with 2 wins advancing over the person with 3 wins. Non-Extended: Says fairness is derived from equality stemming from a reset of past results. If we ignore all past results then that would mean for the sake of consistency you'd have to remove the winner bracket's champion having an advantage over the loser's bracket, no? If not, why draw the line there and not simply for beating an earlier opponent? Why does that logic apply there but not later? I honestly don't have a horse in either race and don't have a large feeling. But both sides make sense, and the outcry about it blows my mind. Hell, at the first MLG there was even pages and pages of people crying that it was a double elimination tournament. People will complain about anything. Again, people here don't really respond to logic, and don't really understand the reality of the issue. You're pretty much wasting you're time here. The whining will overwhelm you. | ||
|
mav451
United States1596 Posts
| ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
kojinshugi
Estonia2559 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:08 Serpico wrote: No...that doesnt make anything fair. It simply makes it applied for everyone so anyone can get screwed. My mind, it boggles. The definition of fair is "the same standards apply to everyone". If you don't like the system they use (I certainly don't), please say that, instead of making disingenuous comments about fairness. | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13410 Posts
| ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
| ||
|
Odoakar
Croatia1837 Posts
Drop the extended series and everything will be ok. | ||
|
pHelix Equilibria
United States1134 Posts
| ||
|
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
| ||
| ||
