EPTDreamHack SteelSeries Lan Tournament - Page 113
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
| ||
|
ste0731
United Kingdom435 Posts
 *cry* | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
lucky me t-t | ||
|
norlock
Netherlands918 Posts
| ||
|
Welmu
Finland3295 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:29 PredY wrote: haha i play servant @ iem 3rd round. lucky me t-t gl dude  | ||
|
DarKFoRcE
Germany1215 Posts
| ||
|
Weemoed
Netherlands741 Posts
| ||
|
DragoonPK
3259 Posts
| ||
|
TBO
Germany1350 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:35 DarKFoRcE wrote: socke naama bischu will play one tiebreaker, if its a tie again i think it will be decided randomly who advances (due to not enough time to play out endless tiebreakers). With all this Tiebreaks going on I think it would have been not really slower if they played Bo3 as the chance of a tiebreak is so much lower there. | ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:35 DarKFoRcE wrote: socke naama bischu will play one tiebreaker, if its a tie again i think it will be decided randomly who advances (due to not enough time to play out endless tiebreakers). Yup I just read that in the rules. Awful, imo. But if the time isnt enough, I guess there's no other choice | ||
|
Pudge_172
United States1378 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:35 DarKFoRcE wrote: socke naama bischu will play one tiebreaker, if its a tie again i think it will be decided randomly who advances (due to not enough time to play out endless tiebreakers). They really should do: A vs B winner waits on loser vs C C vs loser of A/B loser of this is out winner plays winner of A/B if it is C they play once if it is A/B then that player has to win twice | ||
|
Scoop
Finland482 Posts
| ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
http://dh.playdh.com/event/dreamhack-winter-2010/starcraft-ii-dsl-group-stage/110/#/roundrobins or http://www.gosugamers.net/starcraft2/news/13772-dreamhack-winter-2010-groups-for-the-starcraft-2-tournament | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:37 Pudge_172 wrote: They really should do: A vs B winner waits on loser vs C C vs loser of A/B loser of this is out winner plays winner of A/B if it is C they play once if it is A/B then that player has to win twice So C can't lose once whereas A/B can and still go through. no | ||
|
Crazyahmed
Canada280 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:38 Scoop wrote: Is there nowhere to see the results? Results and groups http://www.sk-gaming.com/tournament/1094 | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:37 TBO wrote: With all this Tiebreaks going on I think it would have been not really slower if they played Bo3 as the chance of a tiebreak is so much lower there. Not Bo3 but in fact two matches against each other would've sufficed - so if somebody goes 1-1 while others go 2-0 or 0-2 everything is clear. The chances that 3 players go 1-1 against each other are pretty small tbh. And wtf is this "not enough time", they don't have to stream everything obviously - just let the guys play and stream the most interesting stuff, works for MLG too. | ||
|
Scoop
Finland482 Posts
| ||
|
Pudge_172
United States1378 Posts
On November 26 2010 19:40 HwangjaeTerran wrote: So C can't lose once whereas A/B can and still go through. no Actually you didn't understand it. A vs B lets say A wins B vs C lets say C wins C vs A Winner wins A vs B lets say A wins B vs C lets say B wins A vs B A wins its over If B wins they play again It is certainly better than if they all go 1-1 and the winner is determined RANDOMLY | ||
| ||
