|
On February 12 2011 04:38 Bobster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 04:35 Torai wrote:On February 12 2011 04:33 Bobster wrote: 40 minute game already, map split down the middle, a bajillion tanks on the field.
Who would've thought. >_> BUT theres actually alot of action Yep, Goody is too... good to let things just stagnate like that. Avilo might have a similarly slow playstyle, but Goody is just a class above in micro and multitasking.
Lol. It was a gg, but FYI, I didn't copy him, and he didn't copy me. We just both happen to play the same way if I had realized he was going to waltz tanks to the left side of the map, it'd be a much diff game considering my army was being almost 2x more cost effective.
Watching replay, he had started to get fewer resources than me, with his side of the map being mined out and mine not so mined out...next time the tanks don't walk up the left side , same if I'd known about the island as I did the mass drop at the start of game. Oh well.
|
I expect Dimaga, nerchio, Goody and Darkforce to dominate. ...or at least I'm positive they would have if they hadn't ended up playing in the same quarter of the bracket. >_>
|
|
i was rooting for beastyq, but avilo deserved to win, anyhow tough decision for the admins as they cannot give any ingame chat... anyhow.. i guess this was a bad decision, and even if draw was called, avilo should got the win with 1,5 pts vs 0,5pt for Beastyq... I also lost my interest in CraftCup..
|
On February 12 2011 21:40 jarod wrote: i was rooting for beastyq, but avilo deserved to win, anyhow tough decision for the admins as they cannot give any ingame chat... anyhow.. i guess this was a bad decision, and even if draw was called, avilo should got the win with 1,5 pts vs 0,5pt for Beastyq... I also lost my interest in CraftCup..
Dude, in bo3 3 games are played or 2 games if one player has the first 2 wins (third game doesn't matter then). 1,5 pts is not 2 wins. Regame was a fine choice because if the third game went to beastyQT it would have been a draw - 1,5:1,5 or 1:1:1. Then it's admins call. It would be clearly unfair for a player in beastyQT's position to deny him a chance (which is by rules) for a win, wouldn't it?
Avilo was disqualified because he didn't agree with admins decision for a third game. Avilo needed not to be so stubborn and just rematch. BeastyQT was disqualified for bm. Gomas wins. End of story.
|
|
My opponent doesn't exist? His name is apparently TerranIsImba.896 - but that player doesn't exist is says.
|
@Pitons: ok I agree that 3th match should have been played in the situation of a tie in the 2nd match. But the 2nd match was stopped i guess for no reason from the admins, yeah i know it was a long and boring game, but still there never was a 3 minute "off" time without mining or fights (as far as i know this is the tie implementation in sc2), so they should have just wait the end of the game.
Ex: MKP vs Nada - i guess match 2 in GSL4 (GLS1 in 2011). It was really close to a tie, but MKP won. Nobody came in and told the players that it is tie.
|
On February 14 2011 18:52 jarod wrote: @Pitons: ok I agree that 3th match should have been played in the situation of a tie in the 2nd match. But the 2nd match was stopped i guess for no reason from the admins, yeah i know it was a long and boring game, but still there never was a 3 minute "off" time without mining or fights (as far as i know this is the tie implementation in sc2), so they should have just wait the end of the game.
2nd match would have lasted for hours imho. Fast progress wasn't possible. it would have been a suicide for whoever tried it. regame was a fine choice. Again - imo. It seems my and admins opinions were the same. Your opinion is different and that is good otherwise everybody would act and think the same. In that case our lives would be boring and with no progress. In any case admins were in charge and they made a call. End of story I guess. But this call however it is judged is the reason everybody discussed the matter and offered maybe better solutions for the future. Progress was made.
|
I have a question.. plz answer, how the admins announced the players, which had set busy status? This is very weird for an on-line competition
|
when the game was paused beasty removed busy status to talk to teh admin
enough with this talk now - its in the past - deal with it - move on
|
|
|
On February 16 2011 00:58 jarod wrote: I have a question.. plz answer, how the admins announced the players, which had set busy status? This is very weird for an on-line competition Beastyqt was on IRC and got PM'd by the admins because they were both busy ingame - ive even explained this before in this post i believe
|
|
hmm anyone gonna stream this craftcup ? :<
|
We are STILL going strong ! Streaming the CraftCup EU Esports event #31 at http://imbalanced.tv/ at 18:00 UTC
|
yeah somehow there was a craftcup on the site saying for about 30minutes that it was on air but it was propably just an error that why i was wondering that there were no streams. is it allready known who is casting from imba.tv ? will be fun again this night with imba.tv :D at gtm+1 19:00 \o0/
edit: oh they are allready streaming and with the two people who are the most fun on to watch mcduff and jimraynor ( if i'm right ^^")
|
craft cup must be one of the best cups running in EU. i enter it sometimes, but i usualy get stomped in the 3-4 round :p
|
|
|
|
|