Too bad he got eliminated by the cheeser DAVIT who just rolled over and died to Clide.
Korean Blizzcon 2010 Qualifiers - Page 3
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
vnlegend
United States1389 Posts
| ||
Alphaes
United States651 Posts
On September 21 2010 00:52 stafu wrote: It lists Maka as having won but the brackets indicate Genius won over 2 bo3s (1-2, 2-0). Interesting to see Maka take out TOP twice. Yeah, it seems like Genius should be the winner, with the bracket diagram contradicting what was written. | ||
Shinta)
United States1716 Posts
On September 19 2010 18:49 mnofstl007 wrote: Last years Blizzcon lineup wasnt really spectacular either.. but ya.. you def wont see any kespa players this year. interested to see the participants in the Blizzcon tourney tho... my friend and I literally only go for the SC tournament... i just hope this year they dont make us sit thru so many WC3 matches... last year people boo'ed whenever they put on WC3 and went nuts for SC:BW matches... even the guy who won the WC3 tourney was like "i want to switch to Sc2 and i hope then that people will cheer for me" cause every1 pretty much disliked the WC3 stuff cause it meant less SC stuff. Rofl that's terrible.... All that that shows is that all of the SC:BW fans that went to Blizzcon last year were extremely immature. That's quite pathetic if people actually boo'd for WC3. It really only hurts SC:BW more than it does anything else cause it shows that the spectators are disrespectful and, as I said before, extremely immature. I really hope there are just as many WC3 games as there are SC:BW games because the two games should be treated equally, even if the SC:BW players are little 12 year olds who think Koreans are "soooooo coooooooooool". | ||
Narfin
United States23 Posts
| ||
Gorguts
Canada254 Posts
On September 21 2010 02:08 Narfin wrote: You do realize this is a Starcraft site established back in 2002, right? You just called most of the people on TL "little 12 year olds who think Koreans are 'soooooo coooooooooool'." Pretty sure he's referring to people who hate on WC3. | ||
cuppatea
United Kingdom1401 Posts
| ||
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
On September 20 2010 21:05 GTR wrote: Updated with players, brackets and replay pack. These are pretty sick games. I do like the players that qualified ![]() ![]() On September 21 2010 03:10 Numy wrote: Kinda sad a Korean invitational doesn't have the 2 best players in Korea, Cool and Tester. They are most likely kicking themselves. I would be nice if Blizzard said "HEY top 16 by this date will be to Blizzcon" or something along those lines. I didn't see any notice about it anywhere. | ||
imperator-xy
Germany1366 Posts
he won a non-zvz | ||
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
| ||
GenoZStriker
United States2914 Posts
On September 21 2010 03:10 Numy wrote: Kinda sad a Korean invitational doesn't have the 2 best players in Korea, Cool and Tester. It was based off their ladder ranks. The ladder served a qualifier for the invitational. I would say get used to it because I think that's how Blizzard is going to start doing things from now on. They don't look at players popularity or other tournament results but rather what they have in front them which is their ladder that tells them "these are the best players in this region". That's why I was personally surprised that people said the SEA invitationals was not based of the ladder ranking because it's so not Blizzard to do that. But every tournament has its own qualifying phase and this one just happens to be the ladder. | ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
On September 21 2010 04:42 GenoZStriker wrote: It was based off their ladder ranks. The ladder served a qualifier for the invitational. I would say get used to it because I think that's how Blizzard is going to start doing things from now on. They don't look at players popularity or other tournament results but rather what they have in front them which is their ladder that tells them "these are the best players in this region". That's why I was personally surprised that people said the SEA invitationals was not based of the ladder ranking because it's so not Blizzard to do that. But every tournament has its own qualifying phase and this one just happens to be the ladder. Yeah and Blizzard doesn't tell anyone that they're competing for something on their ladder. As far as everyone knows, the ladder is just practice. People play it much differently than they would play a competitive ladder. As tournament admins, Blizzard manages to mess things up that we can't even imagine were possible to mess up. | ||
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On September 21 2010 04:42 GenoZStriker wrote: It was based off their ladder ranks. The ladder served a qualifier for the invitational. I would say get used to it because I think that's how Blizzard is going to start doing things from now on. They don't look at players popularity or other tournament results but rather what they have in front them which is their ladder that tells them "these are the best players in this region". That's why I was personally surprised that people said the SEA invitationals was not based of the ladder ranking because it's so not Blizzard to do that. But every tournament has its own qualifying phase and this one just happens to be the ladder. Ladder can only be used if they tell at the start of the season that there is a reason to ladder. This is just pathetic. | ||
GenoZStriker
United States2914 Posts
| ||
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
They have mentioned it, but I agree they haven't pushed the issue enough for people to go OMG I gotta ladder. | ||
Rampager
Australia1007 Posts
| ||
![]()
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21242 Posts
Brackets: http://www.wfbrood.com/sc2/bisai/sc2_55553.html Replays: http://rep.sc2.com.cn/search.php?k=BlizzCon&n=选手名&t1=0&t2=0 | ||
blizzind
United States642 Posts
| ||
Pulimuli
Sweden2766 Posts
guess they'll have to ladder some more :b | ||
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
MakaPrime (T) NEXGenius (P) oGsEnsnare (T) oGsZenio (Z) oGsGon (T) CheckPrime (Z) oGsTheWinD (Z) oGsTOP (T) One 'Toss to rule them all... | ||
| ||