EPTTL SC2 Open #1 - Live Thread - Page 27
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
| ||
|
Uhh Negative
United States1090 Posts
On September 19 2010 04:26 figq wrote: And it's not (by far) the first tournament with 4T semi-finals. Expect more of that, even after the patch. Yeah I think people are realizing that terrans are actually overpowered and it's not just whining zergs. If those "leaked" patch notes are true I think things will play a lot better, but I doubt they are true. | ||
|
Ghazwan
Netherlands444 Posts
| ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
| ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6185 Posts
| ||
|
Fogul
United Kingdom179 Posts
| ||
|
Ghad
Norway2551 Posts
| ||
|
Hold-Lurker
United States403 Posts
| ||
|
Full.tilt
United Kingdom1709 Posts
On September 19 2010 04:28 Zzoram wrote: SeleCT had a pretty big advantage. He had 30 more workers, his 3rd was up first with a Planetary, and he had more production facilities. Miscontroling your army and sending them into seige tanks can turn the game very quickly no matter what eco advantage one player has though. | ||
|
lasto
141 Posts
On September 19 2010 03:59 GenoZStriker wrote: Orb: He should start sucking some dicks for gas, because he really needs it.  I lol so hard at that one ... | ||
|
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
On September 19 2010 04:30 Hold-Lurker wrote: Chill - would it still be a rematch if Drafter DC'd? Just wondering how refs would have called it. They said both players agreed. | ||
|
koshka
Germany181 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Ghost_First_(vs._Terran) QXC!!!! you've probably heard of him :D | ||
|
N3rV[Green]
United States1935 Posts
(unless its SERIOUSLY 1 sided.) The two players playing obviously feel that they are both VERY good players, and being such they should have no fear of playing a rematch. | ||
|
_Darwin_
United States2374 Posts
| ||
|
Creep
United States229 Posts
Wish we could have seen the full game.  | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
On September 19 2010 04:30 Hold-Lurker wrote: Chill - would it still be a rematch if Drafter DC'd? Just wondering how refs would have called it. Judging from past decisions, it would probably be a win for Select. If you're allowing people rematches when they disconnect in bad situations, they can cheat by just pulling the plug when they're not doing well. | ||
|
Hold-Lurker
United States403 Posts
On September 19 2010 04:34 Orome wrote: Judging from past decisions, it would probably be a win for Select. If you're allowing people rematches when they disconnect in bad situations, they can cheat by just pulling the plug when they're not doing well. That was the answer I was hoping for, wondering if TL admins saw it the same way. | ||
|
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
On September 19 2010 04:34 Orome wrote: Judging from past decisions, it would probably be a win for Select. If you're allowing people rematches when they disconnect in bad situations, they can cheat by just pulling the plug when they're not doing well. Ya, that seems fair. If Drafter DC'd after being 30 workers and a base down, he should've been given a loss. | ||
|
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
On September 19 2010 04:34 Orome wrote: Judging from past decisions, it would probably be a win for Select. If you're allowing people rematches when they disconnect in bad situations, they can cheat by just pulling the plug when they're not doing well. Yeah, the most logical rule is if you dc then you only get win if you are winning beyond reasonable doubt, but if opponent dc then you win if you have a significant advantage. | ||
|
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
| ||
| ||
