EPT[GSL] Open S1 - Ro64 Day 2 - Page 39
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
telamascope
United States310 Posts
| ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
because in fact it IS the repair of the BC that makes it so incredibly hard to counter; because you can have SCVs in the back of your bio-army and just move the BC above your own army in the back to get repaired | ||
|
cz
United States3249 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:39 sleepingdog wrote: I don't wanna risks a temp-ban, but I have to say I was pretty "surprised" to say the least, that TL didn't allow this auto-repair-BC-strat to be discussed and immediately closed my thread where I linked the replay of august owning tester with it.... ... im sure there were other reasons. TL isn't going to close threads because a build might be too powerful or something. Might just be bad modding and closing threads for other reason. | ||
|
ddod
Bulgaria144 Posts
| ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:39 sleepingdog wrote: I don't wanna risks a temp-ban, but I have to say I was pretty "surprised" to say the least, that TL didn't allow this auto-repair-BC-strat to be discussed and immediately closed my thread where I linked the replay of august owning tester with it.... lol, can't blame em.. I would have laughed at the strat if anyone mentioned it to me but after seeing it... just WOW | ||
|
lolnoty
United States7166 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:39 sleepingdog wrote: I don't wanna risks a temp-ban, but I have to say I was pretty "surprised" to say the least, that TL didn't allow this auto-repair-BC-strat to be discussed and immediately closed my thread where I linked the replay of august owning tester with it.... It's likely it wasn't closed because they thought it wasn't a good strat, but closed because of other reasons. | ||
|
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
| ||
|
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:39 sleepingdog wrote: I don't wanna risks a temp-ban, but I have to say I was pretty "surprised" to say the least, that TL didn't allow this auto-repair-BC-strat to be discussed and immediately closed my thread where I linked the replay of august owning tester with it.... I'm sure there was a good reason for it :o I don't think TL just closes strategy threads if the OP is good enough. | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
| ||
|
Bear4188
United States1797 Posts
| ||
|
Drazzzt
Germany999 Posts
| ||
|
gogogadgetflow
United States2583 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:39 sleepingdog wrote: I don't wanna risks a temp-ban, but I have to say I was pretty "surprised" to say the least, that TL didn't allow this auto-repair-BC-strat to be discussed and immediately closed my thread where I linked the replay of august owning tester with it.... Its because your thread was nonproductively begging for a change with a single replay as evidence, combined with non-stellar post-count... you didnt even attempt to pass your post off as a strategy post. Regardless, you should stop posting in this thread about your own closed thread.. | ||
|
FireBlast!
United Kingdom5251 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:39 sleepingdog wrote: I don't wanna risks a temp-ban, but I have to say I was pretty "surprised" to say the least, that TL didn't allow this auto-repair-BC-strat to be discussed and immediately closed my thread where I linked the replay of august owning tester with it.... because in fact it IS the repair of the BC that makes it so incredibly hard to counter; because you can have SCVs in the back of your bio-army and just move the BC above your own army in the back to get repaired Then, you deserve the SCVs repairing BC icon | ||
|
EleanorRIgby
Canada3923 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:37 dabom88 wrote: Multiple SCVs could repair things at the same time since Starcraft 1 Vanilla. they might want to try diminishing returns with the repairing. That is, if you repair 1% of a units max hp per second with one SCV, 20 SCVs don't repair 20% of its max hp, but you have diminishing returns so it's like 1% + 0.99% + 0.98% or whatever(totally wrong numbers but you get the point) and so on | ||
|
Cranberries
Wales567 Posts
| ||
|
Teeny
Austria885 Posts
On September 06 2010 19:39 sleepingdog wrote: I don't wanna risks a temp-ban, but I have to say I was pretty "surprised" to say the least, that TL didn't allow this auto-repair-BC-strat to be discussed and immediately closed my thread where I linked the replay of august owning tester with it.... There is not really much to discuss about this strat. If you scout it and stay one-base too you are good to hold it. If you don´t scout it with phoenix (almost impossible) you are kinda lost because you have an immortal und zealots against a bc! | ||
|
Highways
Australia6105 Posts
They rape zealots and stalkers and are so cheap. | ||
|
pilsken
Germany441 Posts
| ||
| ||
