EPTOn August 29 2010 03:20 choboPEon wrote:
sean is losing it
sean is losing it
I bet hes laughing even more because camera man is laughing behind the camera. :D
[MLG] Raleigh - Day 2 - Page 61
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
I bet hes laughing even more because camera man is laughing behind the camera. :D | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
I don't think you can discount them as useless in a gateway heavy mix. | ||
|
Cerion
213 Posts
| ||
|
251
United States1401 Posts
| ||
|
PulseSUI
Switzerland305 Posts
Stimmed marauders plow through any unit P has. He's not suggesting that HuK have an army built out of immortals (I think), but rather that he add them for the high damage in supporting the rest of the gateway composition. Immortals do well if you want to hold a choke, meaning you can place them at the top of a ramp and have thhem fire down.. because they do high damage to Marauders. as soon as you do not have that highground advantage, immortals are among the worst units you can build against a MMX ball because of there low range and slow firing rate. | ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
| ||
|
CooLWoLF
United States17 Posts
| ||
|
Shika
Sweden1711 Posts
| ||
|
Woyn
United Kingdom1628 Posts
| ||
|
AmiPolizeiFunk
Germany804 Posts
| ||
|
Alou
United States3748 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On August 29 2010 03:22 Scorch wrote: Hey guys, is there a stream where I don't need that Octoshape plugin? No. Atleast not legit one. | ||
|
Reuental
United States457 Posts
On August 29 2010 03:22 Scorch wrote: Hey guys, is there a stream where I don't need that Octoshape plugin? http://127.0.0.1:6498/ms2/1282943058368/0MediaPlayer 0 /octoshape h mlg.600c/MLG600c I have been using that in VLC. | ||
|
theqat
United States2856 Posts
On August 29 2010 03:23 CooLWoLF wrote: Question: Why do the pro Terran players never put reactors on their barracks? I consistently see Terran players having 4+ rax in the longer games not using reactors, yet they will pump marines out of rax with no tech labs, albeit one at a time? Is it purely mineral conservation reasons? reactors cost 50 gas. two reactors are a free medivac | ||
|
HighDistortion
United States52 Posts
| ||
|
Sputty
Canada161 Posts
On August 29 2010 03:23 CooLWoLF wrote: Question: Why do the pro Terran players never put reactors on their barracks? I consistently see Terran players having 4+ rax in the longer games not using reactors, yet they will pump marines out of rax with no tech labs, albeit one at a time? Is it purely mineral conservation reasons? It takes as much time to make a reactor as it does to make a barracks and it costs gas, some specific timing pushes use reactors to save minerals but there's no other reason to make reactors for barracks most of the time(unless you're trying to save space) | ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
| ||
|
Ramble
Sweden877 Posts
On August 29 2010 03:23 CooLWoLF wrote: Question: Why do the pro Terran players never put reactors on their barracks? I consistently see Terran players having 4+ rax in the longer games not using reactors, yet they will pump marines out of rax with no tech labs, albeit one at a time? Is it purely mineral conservation reasons? You need to really buy time to get reactors, they take 50 in game seconds to make. If you make reactors just as your opponent is attacking you're in a really bad position. | ||
|
evilsaint
United States309 Posts
On August 29 2010 03:23 Crabman123 wrote: http://127.0.0.1:6498/ms2/1282943058368/0MediaPlayer 0 /octoshape h mlg.600c/MLG600c I have been using that in VLC. Still need Octoshape installed and running though. | ||
| ||
