• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:16
CEST 06:16
KST 13:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension1Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China11
StarCraft 2
General
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
$5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [Guide] MyStarcraft BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 642 users

Terran expansion return of investment

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Nilaus
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark159 Posts
April 16 2010 13:47 GMT
#1
Introduction:
Sometimes in a game I wonder if I can afford to make an expansion. It costs the initial investment and it takes some time after it is completed before it returns sufficient minerals to pay for itself.

This can also be presented as "if the expansion can survive for X seconds I will be in a better position by expanding" (hidden expansion). This same argument can be flipped around to "if the game is finished before X seconds then I shouldn't expand" (all-in one base strategy).

So I decided to calculate it for myself and present the findings.

Some assumptions:
* No Maynard transfer (this calculation is mostly for the 3rd base where Maynarding is not always feasible)
* MULE resturns 255 min per trip (between 6 and 7 returns as it depends on the mineral patch layout)
* MULE harvested minerals are added gradually over its entire duration
* All time figures are in game time
* SCV harvesting speed 1 min / game sec
* The building SCV starts mining as soon as the CC is done
* Linear increase in harvesting as a function of the number of SCVs

I tested 2 different scenarios; without Orbital Command and with Orbital Command.

Scenario 1: Without Orbital Command:
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Command Center: 400min, 100sec, 0min
+SCV: 450min, 117sec, 17min
+SCV: 500min, 134sec, 51min
+SCV: 550min, 151sec, 102min
+SCV: 600min, 168sec, 170min
+SCV: 650min, 185sec, 255min
+SCV: 700min, 202sec, 357min
+SCV: 750min, 219sec, 476min
+SCV: 800min, 236sec, 612min
+SCV: 850min, 253sec, 765min
+SCV: 900min, 270sec, 935min
+SCV: 950min, 287sec, 1122min

Scenario 2: With Orbital Command:
(use MULE whenever available):
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Command Center: 400min, 100sec, 0min
+Orbital Command: 550min, 135sec, 35min
+SCV: 600min, 152sec, 103min
+SCV: 650min, 169sec, 188min
+SCV: 700min, 186sec, 290min
+SCV: 750min, 203sec, 409min
+SCV: 800min, 220sec, 545min
+SCV: 850min, 237sec, 698min
+SCV: 900min, 254sec, 868min
+SCV: 950min, 271sec, 1055min
+SCV: 1000min, 288sec, 1259min

Conclusion:
In both cases it takes about the same time for both scenarios to return the investment, which is about 260sec in game time, corresponding to 3min 7sec in real time.

It may seem odd that the Orbital Command isn't favourable, but this is primarily due to the higher investment cost. The Orbital Command is returning minerals at a much higher rate, so as usual it is a great idea to build it immediately as it doesn't affect the payback time.

TL;DR: Don't build an expansion if you can't keep it for 3 min (real time)


michiko
Profile Joined April 2010
United States75 Posts
April 16 2010 14:10 GMT
#2
*claps* *standing ovation*
shockwave.xpow
Profile Joined March 2010
31 Posts
April 16 2010 14:18 GMT
#3
Bear in mind that a CC also gives supply, so its effective cost includes both the opportunity cost of the SCV tied up building it minus the cost of supply that it gives.
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
April 16 2010 14:20 GMT
#4
100 out of 10 times you are going to maynard, soooooo....
inflowgaming.net
ZaaaaaM
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands1828 Posts
April 16 2010 14:21 GMT
#5
Thnx for the work.
Interesting but also useless. I mean, this way of thinking cant be used when playing a match.
no dude, the question
Zoltan
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States656 Posts
April 16 2010 14:22 GMT
#6
On April 16 2010 23:20 JTPROG wrote:
100 out of 10 times you are going to maynard, soooooo....


Just not true- On scrapyard for example its not uncommon to take gold minerals, the island minerals, or one of the blocked off minerals, before your "natural" (because its so damn hard to defend). Its hard to maynard to the islands...
'HOW LONG HAVE THOSE REAPERS BEEN KILLING MY PROBES?!?!
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
April 16 2010 14:25 GMT
#7
You can at least take 5 workers to the island via loading them into the CC
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Drunken.Jedi
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany446 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-16 14:33:44
April 16 2010 14:32 GMT
#8
The problem with those calculations is that they ignore opportunity cost. You do not at all break even after 3 minutes because instead of building the expansion, you could have invested your minerals otherwise, for instance in a bigger army or additional tech, which can either save you resources (by protecting your economy from attacks/harrassment) or cost your opponent resources (either by attacking/harrassing him or by scaring him into investing more resources into defense and less into his economy).

However, the opportunity cost varies greatly based on the current situation and is very difficult to calculate, thus it is unfortunately impossible to state in simple terms how long an expansion needs to break even. However, thanks to your calculations, we now at least know that it's always more than 3 minutes real time if your assumptions are fulfilled.
caution.slip
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States775 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-16 14:43:41
April 16 2010 14:42 GMT
#9
Nice calculations, but shouldn't all the mineral numbers be moved back a step?

Command Center: 400min, 100sec, 0min
+SCV: 450min, 117sec, 17min


You are assuming here that the SCV can mine while it's still building. Instead it should be


Scenario 1
+SCV: 1000min, 288sec, 935min
...
Scenario 2
+SCV: 1000min, 288sec, 1055min


also noting when you drop the mule would be a nice addition. Good work nevertheless.
Live, laugh, love
Nilaus
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark159 Posts
April 16 2010 14:54 GMT
#10
On April 16 2010 23:20 JTPROG wrote:
100 out of 10 times you are going to maynard, soooooo....


I agree that this is always the case for the natural and usually the third. It is not a hard and fast rule, but more like something I've thought about.

The reason for me not to include it is that it is impossible to model Maynarding as it depends on the saturation, distance and number of SCVs transferred, so it will be impossible to get some good benchmark numbers. Island expansions cannot easily transferred to either.

Regarding the whole idea of Maynarding across the map, then I've just seen way too many replays (SC1+2) of people giving away free workers and the location of their hidden expansion by transferring workers right through a camping army.
Nilaus
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark159 Posts
April 16 2010 14:56 GMT
#11
On April 16 2010 23:42 caution.slip wrote:
You are assuming here that the SCV can mine while it's still building. Instead it should be


This is the SCV building the CC that is mining during the construction of the first SCV.
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
April 16 2010 16:22 GMT
#12
Well there are too many things simplified or neglected here to give a usefull number.

First of all the scv building it is not mining so thats a oppurtunity cost of 100 minerals if you are not saturated. If you are this oppurtunity cost lowers.

Second point is that the scv provides 11 supply. A depot gives 7 supply and costs 100 minerals + a oppurtunity cost of 35 minerals (if not saturated).

Combining points 1 and 2 you will get a real cost of 400 + 100 - 11/7 * 135 = 288
This will be slightly lower when you are saturated as the opportunity cost decreases.

Also maynarding has to be included in the time as it's 99% of the case happening.
Mining speed goes up linear up till 16 mineral workers per base and then tops with max speed at 24, with 20 minerals workers being already about 95% of max mineral mining on one base.
Given that by the time a expo finishes your mineral workers are virtually always above 16 maynarding matters alot as extra workers on the expo are way more efficient then extra workers on your main.
To calculate this you need to know the exact efficiency decrease of workers more then 16. The maynarding time can probably just be averaged for 12 secs or so given all maps.

Anyway getting a more exact payback time for a CC isnt too difficult to calculate with some extra data, the number itself will still be relatively useless as the oppurtunity cost of not making other stuff in the meantime (tech, units, etc.) is very hard to determine and gamespecific. In a situation where it's useless to attack and safe to expand this oppurtunity cost is 0 (like when he invested alot in static defense) in any other situation it's not 0 though and extremely hard to determine.

codewarrior
Profile Joined April 2010
United States52 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-01 23:20:18
May 01 2010 23:15 GMT
#13
Should I upgrade to an OC before I lift off, or should I use the CC to carry SCVs to my island expansion? I'll try to compare the two.

Assumptions:

80 second travel time. OC saves its starting energy and lands at the expansion with 100 energy, drops two mules upon landing.
SCVs above saturation only harvest 10% as much.
Transferred SCVs have an opportunity cost of 0.1 minerals/second while in transit.
A MULE is equal to three SCVs in minerals/second.

Blue Minerals
+ Show Spoiler +

Scenario 1: Carry 5 SCVs:
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Carry 5 SCVs for 80 seconds: 40min
Command Center: 440min, 180sec, 0min
+Orbital Command: 590min, 215sec, 175min,
+SCV: 640min, 232sec, 311min
+SCV: 690min, 249sec, 464min
+SCV: 740min, 266sec, 634min
Breaks even at 276sec
+SCV: 790min, 283sec, 821min
+SCV: 840min, 300sec, 1025min
Covers the production cost of transferred SCVs at 305sec
+SCV: 890min, 317sec, 1246min
+SCV: 940min, 334sec, 1484min


In this scenario, the last 2 SCVs we load up will bring us under saturation, so they have a full carrying cost of 1min/sec each.
Scenario 2: Carry 10 SCVs:
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Carry 10 SCVs for 80 seconds: 244min
Command Center: 644min, 180sec, 0min
+Orbital Command: 794min, 215sec, 350min,
+SCV: 844min, 232sec, 571min
+SCV: 894min, 249sec, 809min
Breaks even at 255sec
+SCV: 944min, 266sec, 1064min
+SCV: 994min, 283sec, 1336min
Covers the production cost of transferred SCVs at 293sec
+SCV: 1044min, 300sec, 1625min
+SCV: 1094min, 317sec, 1931min
Mineral line is saturated


Scenario 3: Flying Orbital Command:
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Command Center: 400min, 100sec, 0min
+Orbital Command: 550min, 135sec, 0min
Land at 215sec
+SCV: 600min, 232sec, 102min
+SCV: 650min, 249sec, 221min
+SCV: 700min, 266sec, 357min
+SCV: 750min, 283sec, 510min
+SCV: 800min, 300sec, 680min
Extra MULE dies at 305sec
+SCV: 850min, 317sec, 816min
Breaks even at 321sec
+SCV: 900min, 334sec, 969min

Gold minerals:
+ Show Spoiler +

Assume that energy from other OCs will be used the same way each time.

Scenario 1: Carry 5 SCVs:
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Carry 5 SCVs for 80 seconds: 40min
Command Center: 440min, 180sec, 0min
+Orbital Command: 590min, 215sec, 245min,
+SCV: 640min, 232sec, 435min
+SCV: 690min, 249sec, 650min
Breaks even at 252sec
+SCV: 740min, 266sec, 888min
Covers the production cost of transferred SCVs at 274sec
+SCV: 790min, 283sec, 1149min
+SCV: 840min, 300sec, 1435min
+SCV: 890min, 317sec, 1744min
+SCV: 940min, 334sec, 2078min


In this scenario, the last 2 SCVs we load up will bring us under saturation, so they have a full carrying cost of 1min/sec each.
Scenario 2: Carry 10 SCVs:
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Carry 10 SCVs for 80 seconds: 244min
Command Center: 644min, 180sec, 0min
+Orbital Command: 794min, 215sec, 490min,
+SCV: 844min, 232sec, 799min
Breaks even at 235sec
+SCV: 894min, 249sec, 1133min
Covers the production cost of transferred SCVs at 266sec
+SCV: 944min, 266sec, 1490min
Mineral line is saturated
+SCV: 994min, 283sec, 1849min
+SCV: 1044min, 300sec, 2211min
+SCV: 1094min, 317sec, 2575min



Scenario 3: Flying Orbital Command:
Production: Total mineral cost, Total time, Total minerals harvested
Command Center: 400min, 100sec, 0min
+Orbital Command: 550min, 135sec, 0min
Land at 215sec
+SCV: 600min, 232sec, 143min
+SCV: 650min, 249sec, 309min
+SCV: 700min, 266sec, 500min
+SCV: 750min, 283sec, 714min
Breaks even at 288sec
+SCV: 800min, 300sec, 952min
Extra MULE dies at 305sec
+SCV: 850min, 317sec, 1142min
+SCV: 900min, 334sec, 1357min


After 215 game seconds, the CCs that loaded up SCVs are returning more minerals than the OC, constantly. Before that, the OC can only return more minerals (in the short term) by using a MULE at an established base before it lifts off. The numbers look even worse for the OC when gold minerals are considered. Also, 80 seconds of flying time is fairly long, and shorter times will favor the CC because less energy can regenerate.

Supply depot construction and MULE usage by older OCs should all be constant across these scenarios. Because SCV production may resume at an older base in order bring the mineral line back over saturation, I've marked when a CC covers the cost of producing the SCVs it carried.
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
May 01 2010 23:21 GMT
#14
When you create a OC before flying, you use it just before you lift off offcourse. You don't fly and then drop the mule as you will be stockpiling energy.
Offcourse that whole calculation is totally reliant on how being able to mine at your existing base(s) compares to mining at the expansion which in your assumptions is the 'SCV above saturation only harvest 10% as much'. Considering there is nothing to base this assumption on or whatsoever the whole analysis is a bit useless.

imBLIND
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
United States2626 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-02 01:12:57
May 02 2010 00:57 GMT
#15
So according to this, it takes about 4 minutes game time to break even with a 1base eco after expanding. If this is true, than it takes about just as long to set up expansions as it does in bw (i think?). If blizz made timing pushes and massing stronger and faster, then they should make expanding just as fast. Time to file new balance proposal hahah

Edit: Never mind...making cc/nex/hatch build times go down would not make timing pushes weaker by enough...
im deaf
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 239
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 7684
Leta 171
EffOrt 148
Mind 58
NaDa 50
Noble 21
Bale 6
Icarus 5
Dota 2
monkeys_forever753
League of Legends
JimRising 792
febbydoto32
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1139
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox797
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor66
Other Games
summit1g17568
shahzam798
WinterStarcraft487
Maynarde190
ViBE186
NeuroSwarm117
RuFF_SC283
ROOTCatZ34
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick5320
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH347
• davetesta31
• gosughost_ 28
• practicex 21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush2103
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
6h 44m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
WardiTV European League
1d 11h
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
1d 19h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.