You are annoying me. Yours posts are annoying to read, they lack structure, you cannot use the quote function or any punctuation sign correctly. You cannot read my posts, so I have to repeat myself, and that is also quite annoying. You are incoherent and you do not understand why you cannot compare professionals such as Nada to gamers such as InFiNitY[pG], ToT)NitSirK(, et caetera. You are theocrafting this game as I have never seen it done before, and you aren't willing to give it any credit (same level as c6 games right?) whereas it obviously deserve some.
Again, I cannot assure if this game is really "up to tl.net standards" because there may have been some flaws i didn't catch. Because I can make mistakes. Because the teal terran quite ruined it all along even if the three other players were doing good. But I've no longer the will to discuss this point with you until you put efforts into your posts and reasoning in order to make this discussion worth our time. Or mine at least.
I enjoyed the damn rep and hope rep posters will come up with more soon.
On June 25 2005 05:25 Shiv wrote: You are annoying me. Yours posts are annoying to read, they lack structure, you cannot use the quote function or any punctuation sign correctly.
your posts lack arguments.
You are incoherent and you do not understand why you cannot compare professionals such as Nada to gamers such as InFiNitY[pG], ToT)NitSirK(, et caetera.
LOL. Why cant I compare them? That guy had bad macro according to most standards. Few thousand minerals in the bank is not acceptable for most players.. people asking for advice hear that they should always be under 500minerals.
who the hell is nitsirk? so infinity and nitsirk (whomever he is, tot player, so supposed to be good) were the ones who won? I thought infinity was much better (he was the protoss?), but the terran just had bad macro (ever heard of op scs test? he would get like 0 points there, just like complete newbs).
You are theocrafting this game as I have never seen it done before, and you aren't willing to give it any credit (same level as c6 games right?) whereas it obviously deserve some.
theorycrafting? you are theorycrafting. you believe that hydras were the only good option. but hydras failed. nevermind, discussing something with you is pointless, you will always claim that the zerg used the best strategy - which led to a loss... and I said that the cannon rush and drops were nice, dont try to diss me, you seem to hate me, because I dont agree with you. btw. if you say Im theorycrafting, how do YOU think they could win the game. btw2. according to your flawed logic I could not say that someone massing scouts vs zerglins has chosen a bad strategy - because I would be theorycrafting.
Again, I cannot assure if this game is really "up to tl.net standards" because there may have been some flaws i didn't catch. Because I can make mistakes. Because the teal terran quite ruined it all along even if the three other players were doing good. But I've no longer the will to discuss this point with you until you put efforts into your posts and reasoning in order to make this discussion worth our time. Or mine at least.
bla bla bla it's nice that you talk about reasoning and never answered the mutas=wraiths part.
I enjoyed the damn rep and hope rep posters will come up with more soon.
if you like dling such replays, maybe try wgt, they have lots of average replays there
*this is an example of a replay not up to tl.net standards, which might be considered nice by few people, but in general is just too crappy. and no I dont want it uploaded here
Well on some moments in the game you would be able to say "if there were 12 mutas now toss would be death". And yes that's true, but imo when the zerg would go muta the terran would prolly go valks (he seemed smart enought for it) which means that the zerg would give the control of the game he had away. Hydra's would have been mine choice 2 but prolly with more lings or swarm.
On June 26 2005 15:22 8882 wrote: by the time terran had 3-4valks zerg would probably have cleared the center
He prolly would have seen it coming..
he would not IMO. plus zerg would have muta hydra army - so valks would not be that good anyway. in addition terran would have to spend a lot gas on it (on the other hand he had like 1000)
On June 27 2005 04:37 ban wrote: 8882 nitsirk is trek
ah he changed the nickname, so we would not know he was a hacker
maybe if zerg had MASSED loads of lings (he had some upgrades right ?) lings do wonders against tanksand without meat shields storm is backfire-ing easily
EPT
