I like new maps, always fun to see how the pros use and abuse every detail on them. All of these look pretty promising in my eyes but voted for Wuthering Heights.

Nitrogen

United States5345 Posts

March 25 2008 03:23 GMT

Heights looks hella sick.

MarklarMarklar

Fiji1823 Posts

March 25 2008 03:26 GMT

saw hunters and came in my pants, and now i got that post-ejaculation state of mind so i cant decide

ir high

Showtime!

Canada2938 Posts

March 25 2008 03:54 GMT

Too many polls in such little time make Showtime! go something, something.

Nah, can someone please post all the pics of the maps? I cannot remember them all :[

I think I have to go with sexsexypuss-I mean Wuthering Heights for now. It isn't too often we get a decent map on the snow tileset.

Oh, wait it is Twilight. -_-

fanatacist

10319 Posts

March 25 2008 03:57 GMT

Hunters is the worst decision ever made. Imbalanced starting points from all aspects, be it shared expos or cliffs behind nat. And tankable mineral lines in nat expos? What the fuck? Idiots.

CDRdude

United States5625 Posts

March 25 2008 04:17 GMT

#10

On March 25 2008 12:57 fanatacist wrote:
Hunters is the worst decision ever made. Imbalanced starting points from all aspects, be it shared expos or cliffs behind nat. And tankable mineral lines in nat expos? What the fuck? Idiots.

I think there's a good chance they'll take it out, but until then it's kind of amusing to see Hunters in there with new and exciting maps.

MrOwMrOw

New Zealand48 Posts

March 25 2008 04:44 GMT

#11

i liked the huntress better...seems more balanced and its 6 player...anyway...heights looks cool..so does othello...but colloseum looks like a big fucking pit of massacre lol...

fusionsdf

Canada15390 Posts

March 25 2008 04:51 GMT

#12

othello is the only one I dont see being gimicky

CDRdude

United States5625 Posts

March 25 2008 05:32 GMT

#13

Othello and Andromeda look pretty cool to me, but I misclicked on Colosseum. I'm thinking Othello should offer some great fights over expos, and Andromeda ought to show some nice macro play. That and I'm a zerg who likes to 3-hatch.

Polemarch

Canada1564 Posts

March 25 2008 05:39 GMT

#14

i expect hunters to be awesome for entertainment value, which is what matters. how many of us grew up on 2v2 hunters... i can't wait to see the pros playing it.

as for the other maps... i'm not sure. othello looks interesting

Pangolin

United States1035 Posts

March 25 2008 05:54 GMT

#15

I like Colosseum because it has the coolest name, it's on the desert tileset, and I like the setup of the expansions.

FragKrag

United States11567 Posts

March 25 2008 06:05 GMT

#16

On March 25 2008 11:57 Darkmole wrote:
Is it me or the maps looks similar to each other?

Maybe it's because you can CLIFF ON ALL THE GODAMN MAPS T.T

Spaceball

United States213 Posts

March 25 2008 06:07 GMT

#17

I think the battles over those middle expos on Heights is going to be intense, so that got my vote. I really dislike the cliffable naturals on some of the other maps though, but I'll wait and see how it plays out with the neutral building blocks and all.

TheTyranid

Russian Federation4333 Posts

March 25 2008 06:18 GMT

#18

Aaaaah! Where is the NONE option?!?!? :S

mikeymoo

Canada7170 Posts

March 25 2008 06:20 GMT

#19

On March 25 2008 11:36 Pwntrucci[sR] wrote:
Heights looks coolest, and untill there's a game played on them that's all that counts.

CharlieMurphy

United States22895 Posts

March 25 2008 06:51 GMT

#20

WHERE ARE PICS AND DLS?

edit- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=68449

Edit2 - I hate all the maps. Where is the 'None' option. All bad maps for Z imo.

All new maps suffer from this too many minerals per base, which helps protoss the most and zerg the least.