EPTOn a Liquid` Jacket i would prefer - Page 6
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
Xyik
Canada728 Posts
| ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
|
Winstan90
England20 Posts
| ||
|
KcHappy
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
Lundra
United Kingdom4 Posts
 | ||
|
Meis122
United States7 Posts
| ||
|
xAriA
United States58 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
SHOOG
United States1639 Posts
It makes it look more official, and it's a good way to show off your favorite teams and their sponsers! | ||
|
peekn
United States1152 Posts
| ||
|
Arterial
Australia1039 Posts
| ||
|
WoBWoB
United States7 Posts
| ||
|
Lumi
United States1612 Posts
| ||
|
Vaelone
Finland4400 Posts
| ||
|
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
| ||
|
choe
Germany86 Posts
and wouldnt it be possible to get some extra money from the sponsors for sold hoodies with their logos on it? | ||
|
Euronyme
Sweden3804 Posts
On May 05 2012 07:24 disciple wrote: the PRO version will be considerably more expensive. By PRO version understand the jacket Liquid is going to wear. Why would the sponsor one be more expensive? Wouldn't it be the other way around, considering you're a walking commercial for their brands? | ||
|
j1nzo
Germany367 Posts
if they are small, i'd prefer them on the merchandize. the 2010 tl shirt for example i would'a liked with logos of the sponsors on it... but even more i would like my own nick on it... that would truely make the liquid merchandize outstanding! | ||
|
HeeroFX
United States2704 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On May 07 2012 16:36 choe wrote: i dont wanna look like a fool, means with full sponsors! especially because tl isnt switching sponsors evry month like gsl is doin. and wouldnt it be possible to get some extra money from the sponsors for sold hoodies with their logos on it? But that's common practice for tournaments and team gear is a wee bit different. ;/ On May 07 2012 20:06 Euronyme wrote: Why would the sponsor one be more expensive? Wouldn't it be the other way around, considering you're a walking commercial for their brands? It's more work and detail. It should be obvious. It's always been that way. On May 07 2012 13:22 WoBWoB wrote: Well since none of TL's sponsors, sponsor YOU, or I then it would make sense to not have sponsors on it. But that's just my opinion :| One of the better arguments against, but once again then goes back to exposure and branding. There's a reason why most jerseys include everything. | ||
| ||
