Do you understand the GSL format? - Page 6

oRacLeGosu

Norway151 Posts

January 01 2011 10:26 GMT

#101

I can see how people find the system a bit complicated. This is a new kind of system that really gives the players fair chances, and gives the viewers good matching. I totally agree on this system being clearer once implemented.

meegrean

Thailand7699 Posts

January 01 2011 12:38 GMT

#102

finally, there is a don't care option

xtfftc

United Kingdom2343 Posts

January 01 2011 17:49 GMT

#103

New poll proposal:
If you had to choose between GSL's ridiculous tournament format and MLG's Extender Series™, which one would you pick?

TheDominator

New Zealand336 Posts

January 01 2011 18:55 GMT

#104

I understand the format, but the thing is, I would not care if it was different.
I just want to see Jinro smash everybody

xtfftc

United Kingdom2343 Posts

January 09 2011 16:29 GMT

#105

I tried to find the answer for my question in the live report thread but the main points of discussion are greater infinity, Tasteless's taste and July's banelings, so this thread seems to be the right place to ask.

After the first four games were played, the table was like this:
1. oGsMC 2:0
2. oGsNaDa 1:1
3. oGsInCa 1:1
4. sanZenith 0:2

Why didn't they play the last two games? sadZenith winning against Nada and Inca winning against MC should have made the table look like this:

1. oGsInCa 2:1
2. oGsMC 2:1
3. sanZenith 1:2
4. oGsNaDa 1:2

So, we have two pairs of tied players - Inca and MC with 2:1 and sadZenith and Nada with 1:2. When two players finish with the same score, the one who won the direct match between the two goes ahead. In this scenario, this should have put Inca on top because of his direct win vs MC and sadZenith getting third place because he won against Nada.

What am I missing?

Prev 1 4 5 6 All

Please or register to reply.

Do you understand the GSL format? - Page 6

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming