• Log InLog In
• Register

Do you understand the GSL format? - Page 6

Post a Reply Prev 1 4 5 6 All

oRacLeGosu Norway151 Posts January 01 2011 10:26 GMT #101 I can see how people find the system a bit complicated. This is a new kind of system that really gives the players fair chances, and gives the viewers good matching. I totally agree on this system being clearer once implemented.

meegrean Thailand7699 Posts January 01 2011 12:38 GMT #102 finally, there is a don't care option

xtfftc United Kingdom2343 Posts January 01 2011 17:49 GMT #103 New poll proposal: If you had to choose between GSL's ridiculous tournament format and MLG's Extender Series™, which one would you pick?

TheDominator New Zealand336 Posts January 01 2011 18:55 GMT #104 I understand the format, but the thing is, I would not care if it was different. I just want to see Jinro smash everybody

xtfftc United Kingdom2343 Posts January 09 2011 16:29 GMT #105 I tried to find the answer for my question in the live report thread but the main points of discussion are greater infinity, Tasteless's taste and July's banelings, so this thread seems to be the right place to ask. After the first four games were played, the table was like this: 1. oGsMC 2:0 2. oGsNaDa 1:1 3. oGsInCa 1:1 4. sanZenith 0:2 Why didn't they play the last two games? sadZenith winning against Nada and Inca winning against MC should have made the table look like this: 1. oGsInCa 2:1 2. oGsMC 2:1 3. sanZenith 1:2 4. oGsNaDa 1:2 So, we have two pairs of tied players - Inca and MC with 2:1 and sadZenith and Nada with 1:2. When two players finish with the same score, the one who won the direct match between the two goes ahead. In this scenario, this should have put Inca on top because of his direct win vs MC and sadZenith getting third place because he won against Nada. What am I missing?

Prev 1 4 5 6 All

Please log in or register to reply.