EPTBest TSL Format? - Page 5
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
Snet
United States3573 Posts
| ||
|
wadadde
270 Posts
On November 16 2009 00:46 StylishVODs wrote: More games doesn't equal better finals. They could go for Bo21 and there would be no tension in any game. Less games equals more tension, but also increases the luckfactor. Bo5 is the perfect mix. I remember lots of Bo5 from the korean pro scene, and Bo5 is certainly enough. Only reason why we're in the minority is because many people vote before they actually think about it, as has been stated above. I hope the staff knows about this too. Well, you're right and you're wrong. If you've ever watched a snooker finals, then you'd know that indeed, the first few frames are not the most exciting. However, the longer a match goes, the more tired the players get and it's very hard for players to keep their cool. I'm not that interested in consistently perfect plays. I'm more into seeing these gladiators fight till they've got nothing more to give. The fact that BO5 'works' is not something I will dispute, but getting out of that comfort zone MIGHT bring something special to the finals. | ||
|
wadadde
270 Posts
| ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7992 Posts
Ro7 fucks a lot of the mind game because each of the games lose of their importance. The gambling in cheeses / Bo choices is much, much more exciting in Bo5 imo. | ||
|
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
| ||
|
blue_arrow
1971 Posts
On November 16 2009 03:59 wadadde wrote: Well, you're right and you're wrong. If you've ever watched a snooker finals, then you'd know that indeed, the first few frames are not the most exciting. However, the longer a match goes, the more tired the players get and it's very hard for players to keep their cool. I'm not that interested in consistently perfect plays. I'm more into seeing these gladiators fight till they've got nothing more to give. The fact that BO5 'works' is not something I will dispute, but getting out of that comfort zone MIGHT bring something special to the finals. yeah, it also might bring something terrible and depressing to the finals instead. and comparing sc to snookers is not good, you are always on edge, fidgity, extremely reactive and concentrated in SC, while in snookers you have time to think coolly and chill yourself out. And why would you not want consistent and awesomely-executed plays? I don't want the last few games to become something that looks like some D- scrubs are playing against each other because the players are so tired and sloppy.. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
Especially with the last qualifier stage being a best of 5, I think it would be weird to go back to a best of 3. A best of 5 has between 24-40 games in the round of 16 while a group stage has 24 + tiebreakers. | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11556 Posts
 !Unreasonable to play bo5s for every other game though ;p | ||
|
Vasoline73
United States7833 Posts
Bo7 just isn't all that fun imo. There's so much pressure in a Bo5 but the luck element is reduced more than in a Bo3.... Bo7 just doesnt feel right. | ||
|
EverydayStruggle
United States77 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
Bo3 until Ro16, then Bo5 after. I don't know how anything else is even being considered -_- | ||
|
FantomX
Canada247 Posts
On November 16 2009 16:28 EvilTeletubby wrote: How the hell can you guys voting even consider the Bo7 options. T____T Bo3 until Ro16, then Bo5 after. I don't know how anything else is even being considered -_- I agree. Bo3 can be luck and Bo7 is hugely unnecessary as Bo5 in most cases ends with the person who played better throughout the series, and another 2 games won't change that. Not only for the players themselves but the casters and even the spectators, Bo7 would get boring. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On November 16 2009 16:28 EvilTeletubby wrote: How the hell can you guys voting even consider the Bo7 options. T____T Bo3 until Ro16, then Bo5 after. I don't know how anything else is even being considered -_- There's already a Bo5 qualifier right before the Round of 16. | ||
|
Severedevil
United States4839 Posts
Anyways, Bo5 all-round sounds like the best option, but if I were planning to watch every match I'd probably prefer Bo3 or some kind of group system in the early stages. Mass Bo5 would get tiring fast. | ||
|
arew
Lithuania1861 Posts
this | ||
|
KnightOfNi
United States1508 Posts
| ||
|
No_eL
Chile1438 Posts
On November 14 2009 10:47 Kazius wrote: There should be an option: Bo3 if TvT, Bo9 if ZvZ, Bo7 everything else. hehehe Bo3-Bo5-and finals Bo7 will be great for me. Good luck with all! | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32277 Posts
| ||
| ||
