EPT[GG] Mafia XII - The Summer Season - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On July 09 2009 01:06 Ace wrote: CALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLER! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ce | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
Caller, the way I interpreted that writing was that the "roar" was either the roar of gunfire or an alarm, not the mafioso's signal. Especially since it's described as "prolonged". It is a funky word choice though, I'll give you that. | ||
|
rredtooth
5461 Posts
On July 08 2009 13:50 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: From voting thread: you know what would help with that... IF YOU CHANGED YOUR VOTE TO TRUTHBRINGER YOU RETARDED PLEDGE I can't think of any other reason why you would post something like that except if you knew truthbringer is red and gonna die and you want to look for that happening, but you don't want a mystic to be able to check you since they can't check abstainers. *sigh*. okay. the reason why i voted abstain instead of truthbringer is by abstaining i sort of guarantee truthbringer's death (it was 12-12 with him and ydg but abstaining gave truthbringer a lead almost minutes before votes were finalized) but i don't increase the votelist count so mystics have more names to deal with. i understand its only a difference of 1 but it is enough of a difference. stop making retarded assumptions. e: just wanted to mention that i was actually thinking about voting myself (e.g. I vote redtooth) to keep myself off the abstain list and create a possibility for a virtual rolecheck in an isolated list but didn't know if that was legal. so question: is it legal? | ||
|
rredtooth
5461 Posts
scamp has yet to post in the main thread chaoser has one post i don't know for sure what would have happened in the event of a tie (i assume voting would have extended) but pushing off truthbringer's death only benefits mafia. or am i just being a retarded pledge again? | ||
|
inertinept
Bangladesh1195 Posts
On July 09 2009 02:25 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh why did people vote fog? This could be bad :\ Caller, the way I interpreted that writing was that the "roar" was either the roar of gunfire or an alarm, not the mafioso's signal. Especially since it's described as "prolonged". It is a funky word choice though, I'll give you that. are you trying to act like mafia? people are already suspicious of you... fog halves the killing power of PLEDGES and we got rid of a MAFIA, fog is actually very good. add to the fact that we really dont need vote list checks this early and it guarantees a low kill night while we gather up more information. how is fog bad again? | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
sorry just trying to liven up the game  | ||
|
rredtooth
5461 Posts
On July 09 2009 02:34 inertinept wrote: are you trying to act like mafia? people are already suspicious of you... fog halves the killing power of PLEDGES and we got rid of a MAFIA, fog is actually very good. add to the fact that we really dont need vote list checks this early and it guarantees a low kill night while we gather up more information. how is fog bad again? because the potential benefits of rain are better. with fog we decrease their kp to 3 from 4 so that equates to 3 mafia hits tonight. assuming the angels miraculously do their jobs correctly, we have a net kill of 1. however with rain we double the angels protect powers to a total of four saves and get a net kill of 0. I'm not saying I agree with infundibulum. i was torn between the two myself (do we trust angels or play it safe?). but don't accuse him of being mafia simply because he disagreed with weather. | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On July 09 2009 02:34 inertinept wrote: are you trying to act like mafia? people are already suspicious of you... fog halves the killing power of PLEDGES and we got rid of a MAFIA, fog is actually very good. add to the fact that we really dont need vote list checks this early and it guarantees a low kill night while we gather up more information. how is fog bad again? The reason to vote rain was that mafia could not use the suicide bomber, and it let angels protect two (TWO!) targets instead of one. Now, if mafia figures out who the priest is we are positively fucked, because it stops then plan the we have invested the majority of our energy into, with the goal of bringing back MBH. Note that I don't even think we should be in this situation in the first place (...BC), but we have to work with it. During voting, nobody (except the mafia) knew if the lynch would be green, blue, pledge, or mafia - we had to vote based on the choice that was most likely to be the best. If I KNEW we were going to lynch a mafia and not a pledge I would have considered voting fog. Rain was the conservative choice that was very likely to have given us a confirmed townie. Now, even though the kp has been lowered to 3 during the fog, the angels and priest are in the open to be sniped. Do you see why this could be bad? | ||
|
ydg
United States690 Posts
On July 09 2009 02:27 redtooth wrote: *sigh*. okay. the reason why i voted abstain instead of truthbringer is by abstaining i sort of guarantee truthbringer's death (it was 12-12 with him and ydg but abstaining gave truthbringer a lead almost minutes before votes were finalized) but i don't increase the votelist count so mystics have more names to deal with. i understand its only a difference of 1 but it is enough of a difference. stop making retarded assumptions. e: just wanted to mention that i was actually thinking about voting myself (e.g. I vote redtooth) to keep myself off the abstain list and create a possibility for a virtual rolecheck in an isolated list but didn't know if that was legal. so question: is it legal? You should have voted for economia with me then, it had the 3rd most votes. And with a tie, the person with the most votes first gets lynched, and in that case it would have been Truthbringer (I think). Nice job with the lynch! Good job L, I hope you post your analysis soon in case you get hit. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On July 09 2009 02:43 redtooth wrote: because the potential benefits of rain are better. with fog we decrease their kp to 3 from 4 so that equates to 3 mafia hits tonight. assuming the angels miraculously do their jobs correctly, we have a net kill of 1. however with rain we double the angels protect powers to a total of four saves and get a net kill of 0. I'm not saying I agree with infundibulum. i was torn between the two myself (do we trust angels or play it safe?). but don't accuse him of being mafia simply because he disagreed with weather. yeah that requires the angles 2 people 4 saves (rain) to protect what 20 people? the odds of that happening are far less, and just gives mafia more kills rather than less | ||
|
rredtooth
5461 Posts
| ||
|
ydg
United States690 Posts
On July 09 2009 02:59 redtooth wrote: btw, rereading Mr. Julia's descriptions makes me inclined to say that he is the Hulk (anger, skin color changing, erratic punching). I don't know much about the Hulk but my question is does the person pass out afterwords? Don't know how it connects to "Julia" though. And doesn't explain his adeptness at numbers either. "Banner, a genius, is emotionally withdrawn in most fashions" from wikipedia, so I suppose that could be why he's good at numbers. EDIT: "Under the writing of Paul Jenkins, Banner was shown to be a capable fugitive, applying deductive reasoning and observation to figure out the events transpiring around him. On the occasions that Banner has controlled the Hulk's body, he has applied principles of physics to problems and challenges and used deductive reasoning." Lol I found that funny | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On July 09 2009 02:27 redtooth wrote: *sigh*. okay. the reason why i voted abstain instead of truthbringer is by abstaining i sort of guarantee truthbringer's death (it was 12-12 with him and ydg but abstaining gave truthbringer a lead almost minutes before votes were finalized) but i don't increase the votelist count so mystics have more names to deal with. i understand its only a difference of 1 but it is enough of a difference. stop making retarded assumptions. e: just wanted to mention that i was actually thinking about voting myself (e.g. I vote redtooth) to keep myself off the abstain list and create a possibility for a virtual rolecheck in an isolated list but didn't know if that was legal. so question: is it legal? You don't want to increase the count so they have more names to deal with. Ya, that might work as an explanation if you were confirmed innocent. As for voting for yourself, I doubt you can do that but you could have voted for someone no one had voted for before, but then you would just be trying to get someone to waste a vote check on you alone. You goin' down tomato boy. | ||
|
ydg
United States690 Posts
"Soon after, the building rage within Bruce stemming from all of the stresses building up around him activates his gamma-radiated DNA, transforming him into the Hulk. After the destruction at the lab, Bruce is found unconscious and at home by Betty. Bruce barely remembers his transformation, a sensation similar to birth." | ||
| ||
