|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 07 2009 07:26 L wrote:
Haha, Ace and I were having a chat about you being a retard before you posted this. Then you posted this and confirmed it.
No matter how you slice it, you're on tricode/vivi levels of stupid.
And now, back to reading.
You conspire with Ace? Now I know that you are indeed as bad as him. It's a good thing you believe in MrBabyHands because I would not expect someone of your level to grasp the behavioral analysis he performs. I'm sure you would much rather gloat in your clue analysis as you drown out all the actual useful posts in the mafia game. If I was trying to sabotage the town I'd surely use your posts as a guide.
I'll give you some credit for not being as bad as JeeJee though.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Can someone tell me if it's worth reading L's above post? I assume it's filled with crap about how I'm mafia but if there's something useful I'll take the time to go through it.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 07 2009 08:31 LucasWoJ wrote:
Can someone tell me if it's worth reading Foolishness's post above? I assume it's filled with useless troll crap that is meant to derail the thread, but if there's something useful I'll take the time to go through it.
You're so funny, and original. You realize that you're trolling now too along with me? But I guess now I have irony to laugh at, when instead you could've told me to pay attention and read L's post, and then I would have been doing something productive. I can only assume you didn't read the post either.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 07 2009 08:40 LucasWoJ wrote:
You're slow.
Aren't you happy to be trolling with me? Doesn't it make you proud? You are now an active troll with me! You are now part of the same thing you set out to get rid of. Congrats!
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 07 2009 08:44 LucasWoJ wrote:
You impress me.
I'm flattered! In all honesty I'm glad you were able to have this conversation with me. You impressed me as well, although probably not in the same way as I can only guess at the meaning behind your words.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 07 2009 10:38 L wrote:And for irony's sake: Show nested quote +when mafia are routinely caught, members will show up to defend them. Or bury the post in which they were accused. Like you, pyrr and foolishness did when I posted my analysis of truthbringer? He hasn't shown up either. By your very own logic, you should realize that people who aren't in your little cabal should switch votes, and switch votes now.
I don't think that anyone has defended truthbringer at all, it seemed to me that BC wanted to kill ydg over truthbringer. However if you're talking about us burying the posts then I can't deny that.
You seem to think that I'm all friendly friendly with BC. Let me clarify some things for you. I am in no way associated with BC nor do I ever intend on it. If you look back in the thread I was yelling at his campaign the first day. I think BC is a terrible player and I cannot wait for MBH is revived so the two of you will shut up. Yes, I know I voted for him, but given the choice between the two of you I simply chose who I thought would be the lesser of two evils, and for the most part I feel it's better to vote than to abstain. And as for the ydg vote, I suspected him the first day and that's why I voted for him again (although I will admit I am also suspicious of TruthBringer).
So please don't associate me with that idiot.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 08 2009 05:18 So no fek wrote:
I think either would be viable today, however, if we went with rain, a medic list might be a good idea. List checks could be very helpful (and in extreme cases may more than make up for the +1 KP), but ideally with rain, we'd want to knock the overnight kills to 4, if not even lower, so we make up for the -1 KP for fog.
A medic list is only going to give mafia potential targets to kill. Unless they have already figured out the priest or other blue roles.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 00:12 Bockit wrote:
3) L made it abundantly clear that he suspected BC and wanted to lynch him. And would you look at that? He's dead.
Vote to lynch BC.
Do you honestly think BC is dumb enough to kill L if we was mafia? I'm pretty sure he could anticipate people thinking this. If anything, L's death shows BC is NOT mafia, because the mafia are trying to get us to lynch the Emperor
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 00:45 inertinept wrote:
either way we can't lynch the emporer this early. that would be "foolishness"
You're vocabulary is outstanding
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 00:46 Bockit wrote:
Yes, but he's not dumb.
If he didn't kill L, who had his sights set on BC I'm glad you agree, L could have easily convinced the town to lynch BC today. L is the only guy the town has really been following and is a very persuasive person when he wants to be.
So on the assumption BC is mafia, he could let L live, and risk a pretty likely lynch on himself, or, he could kill L, and hope the town a) is now directionless or b) falls into the 'do you think x is stupid enough to do y' trap.
I honestly don't think L would've convinced the town to lynch BC. Unless MyBabyHands came out and said so. Based on the events that happened yesterday, both BC and L have made it pretty clear that there are some suspectful mafia to be killing. There are definitely better lynches to be taking care of than BC.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 08 2009 09:19 LucasWoJ wrote:
Mafia.
On July 08 2009 12:44 LucasWoJ wrote:
You're mafia as well.
On July 09 2009 09:32 LucasWoJ wrote:
mafia.
On July 10 2009 00:19 LucasWoJ wrote:
mafia.
I'm about to have a field day with this.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 03:24 LucasWoJ wrote:
You're so mafia it's not even funny.
Added to my list.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
I'm sure this is only going to get buried under the mass of "mentally challenged" townspeople, but there are some interesting patterns from yesterday's vote. We know that Truthbringer was mafia. At one point, TruthBringer was the lead in votes by a score of 9 to 4, which is pretty overwhelming (ignoring the fact that a bunch of people had not voted). Adding a few more votes to TruthBringer really put him over the edge. However as we know the vote was very close near the end. The reason for this was the sudden jump of votes against ydg from:
TruthBringer (obviously since he was mafia)
ecomania
Kuja900
motbob
Scaramanga
redtooth (who later changed to abstain which Pyrry called him on)
Then, at this point, the vote was 12-10 with TruthBringer barely hanging on. Then another two votes for ydg occurred,
chaoser
Scamp (now known was suicide bomber)
The score was actually tied at this point, but then two more votes for TruthBringer along with redtooth's abstain made TruthBringer the leader. The fact that all these votes occurred to make it a tie easily shows there was probably some mafia bandwagoning by the above people.
Furthermore looking at the election votes, here's how the above people played out:
BC: TruthBringer, Scaramange
L: ecomania, motbob, chaoser
Abstain: Redtooth
Did not vote: Kuja900, Scamp
That is a nice spread over the election votes. As we know mafia needs to spread out their votes due to fear of list checks and simply because it's easier to hide.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Can all of you please stop this nonsensical arguing? It's more than obvious that every candidate up for lynch is innocent. If anything you're all so fucking annoying, you make JeeJee look smart. Do you guys not realize that mafia is sitting back and not doing anything? You're all so intertwined and stubborn you fail to realize what's actually happening.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 04:37 redtooth wrote:
pyrr makes me want to hate this game...
And this is by far the best post made.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 05:06 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
well its true last time BC and I gunned at each other we were both innocent but BC wasn't hallucinating color changes and youtube video scenes that game.
Do you realize that if BC dies and he's innocent, the town is essentially screwed? I know we have assassins and stuff, but without double lynches and without any direction mafia have an easy win once BC dies.
Despite the fact that you are sure that BC is mafia, if BC turns out innocent you pretty much lost the game for us. Don't you remember JeeJee from the game you hosted? I suggest you go back and look at it, because right now you are pulling a JeeJee.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
This thread hurts my eyes to read.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 05:28 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
Question for Plexa:
"When to activate Double Lynch ability? You can let me know by PM that you wish to use a double lynch in the night before you want to use it. You can also announce a double lynch during the day of voting. If you choose this option the time allocated for voting will be increased."
Does this mean the Double Lynch is already activated because BC talked about intending to activate it in the thread?
I'm sure if BC activated it we have to wait for Plexa to announce it. So whenever he comes back online I'm sure he'll say something. And he extends the amount of time we have so there's nothing to be worried about.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 05:44 LucasWoJ wrote:Did ya shoot me or somethin'? How can I be dead already? EDIT: Also Pyrr, when you're town aligned, you're usually a much smarter than this. Take note of what other veterans have done: ignore a blatant troll. MBH thinks I'm green as well: That's a direct quote.
haha most everyone has been ignoring you as well, "blatant troll"
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 10 2009 06:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
and L had foolishness as a suspect as a potential mafia based on voting habits.
I don't ever recall this happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
