I think our next lynch candidate should be one of the individuals in the detectives' circles, the chance of one family being able to hit 2 detectives together is one out of 3025.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

April 25 2009 19:48 GMT

#415

EDIT:or 3136, you get the idea.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

April 26 2009 06:25 GMT

#446

On April 26 2009 11:48 iLoveKTF wrote:
I had your list of profiles bookmarked yo. It is very useful. Also something to note. In the mayor's election, Bockit and SoG voted for Ace (who got a hit) and SoG said there were PM exchange by him and pyrr on day 1. Not saying or accusing SoG and Ace but maybe this helps in our investigation.

And @ dude above my post: You aren't allowed to edit your posts. :p

I think we can go on from here and lynch Quickstriker.

So far I haven't seen the detectives' leak lead going anywhere, but I will just put it out there that it's always possible they sent their roles to Qatol. To my knowledge he hasn't been validated and there's really no way to validate the mayor in this game.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

April 26 2009 06:33 GMT

#447

EDIT: I know I should use the preview more, I have no idea how I managed to quote the wrong post.

On April 26 2009 10:09 iLoveKTF wrote:
Seems like Bockit was protecting Quickstriker with some sort of reverse psychology when he said "I could be wrong about quickstriker, my gut says he's not mafia but if you were to pick him I can't imagine anyone complaining (lack of anyone else to pick at this stage really)."

Thats too shallow though.

In addition to his name being a giant clue and mentions of swiftness in day posts, I agree with KTF in that Bockit was protecting him. Hence my vote for Quickstriker.

On April 26 2009 12:51 Qatol wrote:
I am trying to be VERY generous with the term "inactive" but have made another list. For god's sake people. Don't join this game if you can't say anything.

Here is the list of inactives:

Show nested quote +

People on the list who voted:

Show nested quote +

List of people with 1 one-liner post, but posted SOMETHING:

Show nested quote +

List of people I consider to be exceptions due to school:

Show nested quote +

I bet most of them are townies like me. If you can differentiate between a lack of interest and an intentional (but knowledgeable) distortion, then that will go a long way to selecting potential mafias hiding amongst townies.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

April 26 2009 06:45 GMT

#448

And by that, I basically points my finger at Rage.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

May 01 2009 10:14 GMT

#756

Time to lynch Qatol, there should be no contest, not even quickstriker. Qatol led us into one townie after another, wrote walls of text fighting ver and ace, let's not have him fool us again.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

May 03 2009 21:10 GMT

#852

I feel we have not stressed enough of the fact that somebody betrayed 2 detectives on day2. The only real possibility I see is that they gave up their identity to Qatol, the Mayor.

Speaking of the Mayor, in this game, there's no way to positively validate the mayor's innocence. Yes he won't die from mafias until all his bodyguards are dead, but what good is that when he can be a mafia himself, and from what I have observed, this mayor in particular is now the no.1 suspect. What's worse is that he's using his 3 votes privilege to get help himself by voting the next lynch candidate, Quickstriker. Now, Quickstirker is also a strong suspect imo. And it won't surprise me if he turns out red because a) a mafia mayor is much more valuable than a mafia henchman b) Qatol can gain some trust this way c) it was already a two-way contest between Qatol and Quickstriker by the time Qatol first responded, it was his best bet to save himself.

Let's not forget all the other clues (especially behavior-wise, how he has never been able to nail a mafia and that Ace and Ver were highly suspicious of him). By lynching Qatol, we will have more information gained than from lynching any other suspects.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

May 04 2009 03:27 GMT

#868

On May 04 2009 11:01 Malongo wrote:
1- Qatol starts voting as a single townie.

I don't know much about the rest of the "declaration". But Qatol needs to go today, and his 3 votes on Quickstriker is the only thing keeping him alive.

Town, if you are reading this and your vote is not on Qatol, you need to change it now. I'm not sure about double lynch, if we get enough votes for it (it certainly doesn't look like we will get it just from the sheer amount of inactives alone), the second one should be Quickstriker. Since authorizing a double lynch today would mean less chance of lynching Qatol, I'm not going to vote for one today.

GoodWill

Canada148 Posts

May 04 2009 04:05 GMT

#870

On May 04 2009 12:49 Malongo wrote:

Show nested quote +

The only thing I can do about todays voting is to ask for Double Lynch tomorrow. You dont seem to understand our position really. Even if we lynch Qatol and flips red we are indeed screwed. Not voting for a Double Lynch means we wont use the power ever. Lets suppose a great position for the town: mafia trade 2 hits tonight: 2 less mafia 1 less KP, 5 townies death (counting the CK). Then we are 35 people alive and about 9-11 mafia. One more lynch and five more hits. We dont have time thats for sure. I rather fail at double lynching instead of waiting in my living room for the game to end. The second reason is that actually lynching non voters and inactives forces mafia to come foward. If you can convince people to lynch Qatol i dont really care too much i wont change my vote to lynch him or to defend him. Im playing this game trying my best to HIT mafia. Lordweirds clue fit almost perfectly and thats why im voting him, because his behavior is as fishy as Qatol but his clue matchs better. Whatever happens in todays lynch i cant do anything else, im fighting for tomorrow. Vote Double Lynch.

oh, for tomorrow, forgot about that, sorry

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh