EPTTL Mafia 2 [GG] - Page 170
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
| ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
| ||
|
Naib
Hungary4866 Posts
On March 29 2008 01:43 Ace wrote: Well this much is certain, Ghar is about to be dropped off the suspect list. Whether he is Mafia or not right now isn't a concern. Bumatlarge is suspect #2, and wurm is suspect #1. Just to clarify, you want us to vote for suspect #1 OR #2 according to your list (NOT both) and then do whatever we want with our second vote, right? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ghar
Australia62 Posts
| ||
|
Naib
Hungary4866 Posts
On March 29 2008 02:44 Ghar wrote: What was your original intention with the double lynch if the second vote is to vote whatever? More detective data collection? I think it just made things a bit more confusing. He divided the active people into 2 colums so suspect #1 and #2 still gets lynched, AND he can narrow down on the Mafia with the detectives, too. It's really not that complex, duh. | ||
|
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
| ||
Kau
Canada3500 Posts
On March 29 2008 02:37 Ace wrote: exactly, but also dont vote for myself or randombum unless unless you're obviously innocent and knowing that wont effect the ratios. Actually, even then that might not be a good thing. Say the split would've yielded a 1/4 mafia, but instead, with second votes, you have another 10 people who also voted, and 1 of them is mafia, then you end up with 2/14 and you get a worse ratio no? | ||
|
Ghar
Australia62 Posts
If he only means to have one person of suspect 1 and 2 killed, then who's the second lynch for? I might be confused, if I am, my apologies. | ||
|
araav
Armenia1590 Posts
On March 28 2008 16:22 araav wrote: Now, i am going to prove I am a green. The plan is this: Ace tells us which of the two small groups (Ace|randombum) will be checked by a detective and I and only I join THAT group with one of my votes i will also vote for Ghar with my other vote. as many are sure i am a townie, i would like this be performed against randombum and Ace - both and only you both vote on the same list - the one that will be checked! | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
On March 29 2008 03:03 araav wrote: as many are sure i am a townie, i would like this be performed against randombum and Ace - both and only you both vote on the same list - the one that will be checked! Ace clearly isn't Mafia. | ||
|
qrs
United States3637 Posts
| ||
|
Kau
Canada3500 Posts
On March 29 2008 03:03 Ghar wrote: Yes, but it seems that Chuiu combined the double lynch list together. Thus in effect, nullifying Ace's vote split between suspect 1 and 2 if we are to have them both killed by the end of today. Because people who cast their second vote on the other suspect will have a vote in both suspects. If he only means to have one person of suspect 1 and 2 killed, then who's the second lynch for? I might be confused, if I am, my apologies. You're suppose to use your second vote on anyone but the original 4 (suspect 1, suspect 2, ace, randombum). I think the goal is to kill both suspects, so the second votes must be spread thinly enough so that this happens. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
Ghar
Australia62 Posts
On March 29 2008 03:49 Kau wrote: You're suppose to use your second vote on anyone but the original 4 (suspect 1, suspect 2, ace, randombum). I think the goal is to kill both suspects, so the second votes must be spread thinly enough so that this happens. It makes more sense now that you put it as spreading the second vote out so that suspect #2 will take precedence over the second lynch, but then instructing people to abstain the second vote would be clearer, and less error prone. I kept thinking of it as 2 separate lynchings, once one lynching is done, the slate is wiped clean for lynching 2, but if Chuiu is combining the vote count, then your solution would be the most consistent with his actions. Thanks, that clears up alot. | ||
|
Jimtudor
Canada259 Posts
| ||
|
Empyrean
17053 Posts
On March 29 2008 03:03 araav wrote: as many are sure i am a townie, i would like this be performed against randombum and Ace - both and only you both vote on the same list - the one that will be checked! I agree. | ||
|
MoRe_mInErAls
Canada1210 Posts
So the detective won't speak up if they're both innocent? How is this any different? | ||
|
Lenwe
Netherlands757 Posts
On the 0,00001% chance that noone of the DT's checked him: Then we are screwed anyway, since the mafia have a list of pretty much every blue in the game and it is game over. So why would we waste a valuable DT question on something that we already know. Why are people still so worried about this Ace being mafia thing, while the chance of him being so is nearly 0% (once again, if he is our DT's screwed up and this is pretty much gg). Why not use that question to gain more information and proceed with Ace's plan, which so far has made perfect sense and has led us to our first mafia kill. Start worrying about other people's behaviour and start linking clue's to them. Post those results here in public or pm them to Ace telling him to post it in public if you are afraid for your own life. | ||
|
nemY
United States3119 Posts
 | ||
| ||
