EPT[M][T] Aperture Mafia 4, Episode 2 - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
I don't think we should be asking about what corruption will do when we have so many claims to evaluate. Perhaps if it increases to 2 we could see what would happen at 3 but right now at 1 there's not much point if I read the OP correctly. Rayn's return to the thread has been less than inspiring. Among a litany of list posts his seems mostly aimed at staying stuck in his reads he made hours ago and dismissing anything that has happened since. That said he is no stranger to confirmation bias so it's not particularly alignment indicative for him to not have developed further. What's hilarious about this is that I actually find myself agreeing with him about the corruption level now that I think about it. I might choose to go myself and gain some information. I don't think I'm going to take any action involving my role as it exists now. That may change later on, because I don't know much about my role! I didn't realize a different mini actually had multiple scum teams, but the OP reads as if there's only one (especially given the stated 1 KP) so until I have reason to believe otherwise I am going to play under that assumption. I don't see much merit in speculating about the two scum team theory. I already stated why I take Hapa's claim at face value and dismissing that read because it looks like buddying is absurd. If I am indeed mafia, why would I buddy with a competing alignment? If we were both mafia, why would we need to "buddy up"? Rayn's reasoning here is obviously flawed, and as he himself admitted he has too many scumreads for them all to co-exist. Shockey's list post was particularly awful. It is early sure but that was a series of thin one-liners that displayed a lack of critical thought about the game, especially as it pertains to me. I have not refused to cooperate with anyone. I have stated how I wanted to play the game and I have done so. Rayn's meta-defense of my scumread of Shockey for his posting leaves me less than enthused if this is what I should expect from a player who thinks they are analytical. Rayn's seeming certainty of Shockey's alignment is unsettling, to say the least. I have to assume knowledge outside of the thread, and the withholding of that knowledge is inherently anti-town in my opinion. There are a lot of players in this game I don't have much of an opinion on because of their sparse, conversational and interaction based posting. Grack seems to be solely reactive. Onegu, likewise, seems to be mostly reactive outside of his claim. Ticktock's posting appeared rather bland and inoffensive, but was more substantive in comparison. One person I absolutely do not care for is Acro. He is hyper-focused on Hapa's claim to a fault. His comments on anything outside of that since the early parts of the game are sparse. He wrote a whole bunch of nothing about my spat with Rayn and has followed up on literally nothing except his evaluation of a single 3p claim. This fixation is something that appears genuine, but could easily come from mafia. I do not trust him. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Why would you think your night action is worse than visiting the database if your claim is true? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
You have repeatedly said that you are the best person to check the database which implies that you have nothing better to do or that you have some sort of special interaction with the database which runs counter to the claim. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
I'm not sure if I should or should not think this could come from scum Rayn. I absolutely think it's possible you are intentionally misleading a lot of people about a lot of things. I am very suspicious of you. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On October 30 2020 15:28 Onegu wrote: Hey question. I know I'm a idiot but with the corruption at 1 right now and it only having shit happen at 1,3,5 don't we want as many people as possible going tonight? To get the most clues? That is correct. Assuming we don't value keeping the corruption as low as possible for as long as possible. But this early with no real town consensus I think it's inevitable that it will go up. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On October 30 2020 16:03 raynpelikoneet wrote: You mean like my claim doesnt make sense because i am refusing to claim??? lolol You claimed your role makes you sure that Shockey is town and you posted in the thread that you activated some part of your role, though no host message followed like it did Dirk's. And yes, your refusal to be more forthcoming is ridiculous. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On October 30 2020 16:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: I already said the first part is not true. Everything else is nonsense. Me using a power and not telling what i did is in no way scummy. So you lied in the thread, called me mafia because my read on Shockey was "too easy", repeated my exact line of questioning re: Shockey's motivations and still think I'm mafia because I "write too much". I think you just don't really read my posts. This is exactly what I expect unfortunately so whatever. Continue to be wrong if you must. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On October 30 2020 16:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: I dont understand what you mean by your line of questioning re: Shockeyy? Then you're not reading my posts, as I said. In a gesture of good faith, I will go IN MY OWN FILTER and show you the posts you made later on basically verbatim: On October 29 2020 04:53 yamato77 wrote: Why do you think you're a good candidate? On October 29 2020 05:37 yamato77 wrote: I wish for you to be more forthcoming about your claim here. What do you intend to do if you do go to the database? Why should we trust you? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On October 30 2020 16:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: i also thought you think i am mafia and not "wrong"? Which is it? Who knows. I don't have to know your alignment on Night 0. I am suspicious of you. I attempt to work under the assumption that you're town and wrong in order to make you see the light of day but you generally refuse to be reasoned with so I grow weary. At some point I have to just treat you like you're mafia if you refuse to cooperate. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On October 30 2020 16:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have eead those posts, I dont understand why this is a reason for me to change my read on you? Think critically about this game and how I've played. I come into the thread with a Shockey scumread and you DECLARE that he's town. You lied. You call me mafia (at least partly) because my scumread of Shockey is "too easy". You then recent your claim and try to ask the EXACT SAME QUESTIONS to Shockey about his motivations and the inherent logical inconsistencies in his posts that I already pointed at while apparently continue to believe that my suspicion of him comes from a mafia perspective? How does that make sense, exactly? Why should I trust a player who plays like this? How am I supposed to interact with you? These are questions I do not have an answer to. I just have to assume your alignment at some point because I cannot make a whole lot of sense out of what's going on there. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
| ||
