[M][N]Oil Futures Mafia

On April 30 2020 00:59 Fecalfeast wrote:
Jock seems opportunistic for the koshi vote and shockkeeeyy seems like he was just throwing shit at the wall and was surprised it stuck

On April 30 2020 01:04 Fecalfeast wrote:


The initial post yes but he voted immediately after jock voted.

On April 30 2020 01:30 Kurumi wrote:


Because it never happened. Or, at least until rayn shows where this has happened.



Are you fucking with me or? I didn't press enter at all?

As for bolded, what the holiest of fuck. What?

And yes, scum do that, because it might be easy early to discredit someone in the thread or because they panic.

On April 29 2020 23:47 Jockmcplop wrote:
alakaslam:
+ Show Spoiler +

I find these posts pretty scummy, like you want to agree with Kurumi but then want to back out for some reason.

You seem so sure in one post and unsure in the next. Kurumi's logic train very much had to do with his suspicions on trfel and you seemed sure about it but then next thing you're like "yeah but maybe not." and that's it.

Also, Kurumi's logic, I pointed out above why its bad logic. On the one hand, he says that all trfel has done is ask questions, but trfel's questions brought more information into the thread, which Kurumi says is 'never bad'. I don't think Kurumi is using consistent scumhunting logic here in going after trfel.

On April 30 2020 03:17 Koshi wrote:
I think Kurumi comes out very town in the exchange between him and rayn. Kurumi was aggressive interrogatory towards rayn and rayn was "gtg I go sleep and reread tomorrow" which shows weakness.

On April 30 2020 03:36 Koshi wrote:

This post shows jock is thinking about the game and the thought process of others.

Is townie.

On April 30 2020 01:42 GlowingBear wrote:


No way.

##Unvote
##Vote: Jockmcplop

You're mafia.

On April 30 2020 03:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey Koshi are you around in an hour or so?

On April 29 2020 14:01 Trfel wrote:
@Alakaslam and GlowingBear, thanks for answering my questions.

---

Anyway, I find Kurumi to be the most interesting person in the thread at the moment.Super non-committal, zero followup. Saying it's "not bad" means he thinks there is something to it, but he didn't say another word on the subject in any of his posts. Yes, I know, Fecalfeast didn't post in that time so there was nothing new to discuss, but I still think that if Kurumi actually found Fecalfeast suspicious/interesting he would have mentioned it to others. Like later that same post:Why is he more interested in me making an excuse than the scumread he just said was decent? But that's what he chose to ask raynpelikoneet about.

And he never seemed to stop and question raynpelikoneet's alignment, or even find raynpelikoneet's response interesting. This I really don't get. Raynpelikoneet's play of hard defending someone early in the game for weak reasons (especially in Kurumi's view, for the exact same reason he is suspicious) should be seen as a terrible play. I'd think that would be at least worth mentioning. But all Kurumi cares about is a player who made an excuse, not the alignment of the person he's interacting with.

Doesn't feel right to me. Thoughts?

On April 30 2020 00:08 ShoCkeyy wrote:




His post here about dead game being a dead game, then his follow up post here to you Trfel.



Typically as town I act like I don't care, but I do care. As a mafia member, I actually wouldn't care about what town thinks since the end game is winning and killing town.

On April 30 2020 00:27 Kurumi wrote:


I do know. I've been part of this forum for 9 years now and did my fair share of spamming.



Trfel's questions were useless or bad. One they asked Alakaslam made absolutely no sense given that Trfel was one giving a cop-out. The way they questioned me about my opening post was not to make me introduce me into the game, but to learn how committed I am to the game. Why do they need to know how committed I am to the game? Well, it makes deciding how the N1 KP goes.