EPTthis is from a sarcastic post that was meant to copy a rayn post
[M][T] Secret Hitler, Act I, Take II - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
this is from a sarcastic post that was meant to copy a rayn post | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 10 2018 01:37 byj wrote: For what it's worth I haven't been online since my last post, not like you'll believe me, especially since kita asked me to stay  Yeah but in that last post you asked if you could switched your vote. On November 08 2018 05:28 byj wrote: Oh that's high. Because I trust Grack, but I expected the FFF chance to be lower. I don't trust kita enough to leave him a 33% excuse, is it possible to change my vote? I don't know why you wouldn't switch your vote before leaving in that case. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 10 2018 02:09 kitaman27 wrote: People really need to pay more attention to this. The single most important part of this game in regards to ones alignment is voting record and election actions. RELS HAS NOT CONTRIBUTED TO A SINGLE LIBERAL POLICY BEING PASSED. He failed the rayn/krogan vote. He failed the grack/prpl vote. He didn't vote for conversion and rayn. He failed the kita/grack vote. LOL. Since you believe at least one elected people is scum, one of these votes must be pretty good then  On November 10 2018 02:09 kitaman27 wrote: He's suddenly "motivated" to play the game. You know why? Because he finally has an opportunity to send a facist policy through. How convenient. Anyone that has played with me these last year knows I get more motivated the more the game advances. So you're lying and you know you're lying. It's also easily checkable so it's a pretty bad lie. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 10 2018 02:04 kitaman27 wrote: I was suspicious of Grack because I didn't like his nomination choices. When he chose not to elect you or conversion I decided to vote for him through (I was the tiebreaker). As for the Conversion is Hitler thing, I would be pretty surprised if Hitler hadn't figured out who his buddies are by now. If I can figure out that you're mafia, it should be pretty obvious to Conversion too considering how much you've propped him up all game and you've never supported a liberal agenda. You were suspicious of Grack because you didn't like his nomination choices. But you also thought his nomination choices were scum. But you also thought scum wouldn't elect scum with them. So your reason to scumread Grack shouldn't make Grack scum. When Grack finally chose another dude that you were less suspicous about, that should have made your Grack / Conversion or Rels MORE likely to be true, not less. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote: What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good? I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it. I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation. Your last sentence prove what is checkable. It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that: "Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!" But he's also pushing the idea that: "One of the elected people is scum!" Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ? | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 10 2018 03:13 prplhz wrote: No. What is wrong with winning a game through scum passing 6 liberal policies in an effort to look good to town? And why is it better to vote no to three governments without scum that passes liberal policies than it is to vote yes to a government with scum that passes a liberal policy? I'm having a very hard time understanding this particular thing. Why is it better to downvote a scum government that passes liberal than to upvote three town governments that passes liberal? Anyway, scum will always want to pass some liberal policies in the beginning for town cred, so let them. I don't understand what you're saying. I'm not claiming I'm town due to my voting pattern, I'm defending against kita's accusation that my votes make me scum. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 10 2018 03:32 kitaman27 wrote: You're not defending it adequately though. Voting no to all four pairings and justifying it by saying one of those 6 players was mafia, doesn't make it okay. I'm attacking your reasonning. You think at least one dude elected is scum, yet you're attacking me saying "he voted NO to all the teams, therefore he's scum!" Well according to you, I voted NO to at least one scum, so your reasonning doesn't make sense. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 10 2018 03:40 kitaman27 wrote: My argument is that you haven't contributed to a single liberal policy being passed based on your voting record. There isn't any way to depute that, regardless of how you want to frame it. and that doesn't make anyone scum. Especially since I voted against at least one scum in your view of the game. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2018 02:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: You are also a hypocrite Rels, you and kitaman both have read byj as town and that's a fucking retarded read. Now you are using circular reasoning. And i wont quote you my questions because you literally said you saw them ans´d would answer. So fuck you, I think he's scum now. He used his "I'm doing my own stuff" play to vote for kita when he said he would be switching. I was thinking his play was townie 'cause he was doing his own stuff without impact in the game, but now that he used it to push mafia's agenda, I think it was just a scum play to coast by. The only question I remembered I went back to answer, it was the "prp didn't want to be chancellor D2" stuff. But I can go check if that makes you happy. p: | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
So you're saying that if I apply the "player X treated 2 players differently and that's scummy" to krogan, I should have applied it you too right. But I didn't apply that to the prp chancellor election ? I said I didn't like that he attacked prp, then changed his opinion when you posted a +1, as if he got scared to vote for Grack / prp before, but after the thread leader said "prp is town", he was confident he could sneak a YES. Nothing to do with "treating 2 players differently" in this situation. The "treating 2 players differently" was for the "do fascists know each other ?" stuff. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2018 03:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: It does not help you said you have seen question adressed to you and you would answer them after... And the question i posed was the one you never cared about... I went back and answered the thread things I remembered (krogan's answer to one of my post, krogan saying I never explained my scumread on kita, and your question about prp chancellor). Yeah I didn't remember this one you juste quoted | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2018 12:41 kitaman27 wrote: lol gj Rels ty | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2018 22:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because i didn't think Grackaroni + Conversion would have a chance to get elected and prplhz looked townie then. I don't know why you are asking about stuff that is very clearly written in my filter. Wrong. I'm talking about this. On November 01 2018 18:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: Anyways i dont think grackaroni should choose conversion as chancellor anyways since conversion is next in line for president. Can you explain this logic ? I don't understand why it's bad for a president to chose the next-in-line to be chancellor. | ||
| ||
