EPT[M] Mafia For Busy People - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9639 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22632 Posts
On June 10 2018 00:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: I do not for a second believe Palmars read is genuine.  | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
I am pretty sure i am correct here. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 10 2018 12:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am pretty sure i am correct here. Explain? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
I also dislike kitaman's reasoning on the vote, because if that's the only two things you can think of then well.. oh boy you're wrong and gonna be wrong a lot. That being said i don't know if it just a playstyle thing, especially since i tend to misread kitaman almost every game. But iamperfection i could probably see being mafia. I agree on the points on Koshi and Mocsta, i jut don't think the points make either of them mafia. I like Superbia and Kelsier the most so far, maybe Holyflare can actually be town this game. Grackaroni can you play like you did last game please? Why can't i get an easy read on you here? Palmar is mafia. There is no way he words his post like that, and doesn't even vote for me if he actualyl believes i am mafia. And if he doesn't actually believe i am mafia the whole post doesn't make any sense because it is weekend and he'll have less time than during the week. But then again, if he believes i am mafia (as strongly as he suggests) he would be pushing my lynch because he doesn't have to do anything else (since its weekend) as he already found a mafia, and not make a crappy comment about "but lest not lynch him yet because i dont wanna argue". Like it's so so so terrible, it doesn't fit his MO, it doesn'r make any sense he doesn't want to lynch his scumread at all and instead he just makes a comment that will most likely provoke a reaction that he says he doesn't want in the very same post. Very much mafia, thanks. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
since you are here why did you not call me out of what HF said earlier if your reasoning is what you really believe? You could have made the case earlier by yourself, not only after i actually did something that contributes to scumhunting? Actually iamperfection is just worse here, the guy has done nothing but trolling and then joins this wagon only after, again, when i actually post something relevant to scumhunting. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
|
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
|
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 10 2018 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote: I also dislike kitaman's reasoning on the vote, because if that's the only two things you can think of then well.. oh boy you're wrong and gonna be wrong a lot. Fine, I'll add party pooper to the potential options. It's the fact that you didn't really follow things up afterwards that looked the worst imo. When you said that Palmar's post couldn't have been genuine it read more like "I haven't posted anything wrong yet so he can't possibly have caught me". Your claim that the initial Palmar post was relevant scumhunting doesn't carry much weight considering the comment was made in passing and you don't directly confront him until now after 3-4 people start pressuring you. On June 10 2018 13:33 fuba wrote: Don't vote rayn~ Lets hear why. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Why Superbia specifically? I don't see any problems with his play so far. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On June 10 2018 13:56 kitaman27 wrote: Fine, I'll add party pooper to the potential options. It's the fact that you didn't really follow things up afterwards that looked the worst imo. When you said that Palmar's post couldn't have been genuine it read more like "I haven't posted anything wrong yet so he can't possibly have caught me". Your claim that the initial Palmar post was relevant scumhunting doesn't carry much weight considering the comment was made in passing and you don't directly confront him until now after 3-4 people start pressuring you. I can see you actually believing that since you haven't been in a game with me lately. I don't actually say things i don't mean, and i don't actually say things i won't follow up on. I don't think i do that even as mafia, and the way i posted about Palmar i most likely post as either alignment, i for sure know i do as town as i just did. The truth is i expected more to have happened yesterday, even early on, since the playerbase in this game is quite competitive, but apparently these games with "good" players nowadays are a shitfest or a dick measuring contest where most of the people think they don't need to actually play, or even don't try to play with the time they have. I also slept most of the yesterday and given the game state at the time i just didn't care enough to post, so there is that. But yeah well, you can believe your story or you can believe mine. I don't really care i am just here for the puzzle. | ||
|
fuba
United States663 Posts
On June 10 2018 13:56 kitaman27 wrote: Fine, I'll add party pooper to the potential options. It's the fact that you didn't really follow things up afterwards that looked the worst imo. When you said that Palmar's post couldn't have been genuine it read more like "I haven't posted anything wrong yet so he can't possibly have caught me". Your claim that the initial Palmar post was relevant scumhunting doesn't carry much weight considering the comment was made in passing and you don't directly confront him until now after 3-4 people start pressuring you. Lets hear why. It's a feeling - I should have more to say in the morning after the drinking :D | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On June 10 2018 03:09 kitaman27 wrote: Count me in on the rayn is mafia bandwagon. First dude to whine about the thread not being on track is usually mafia trying to make a town post or a try hard townie and there is nothing to suggest the latter so far. See here is the thing, in the last post kitaman asks me to explain my stance on Palmar (which kind of even isn't why he said he thinks i am mafia earlier -- which he followed up on with). The problem is that his vote on me comes before i explain my stance on Palmar. So like.. at the same time he is interested in why i think Palmar is mafia (which he shouldn't if he is being genuinely scumreading me at this point), but after i give my explanation, he STILL claims i am mafia for: When you said that Palmar's post couldn't have been genuine it read more like "I haven't posted anything wrong yet so he can't possibly have caught me". Your claim that the initial Palmar post was relevant scumhunting doesn't carry much weight considering the comment was made in passing and you don't directly confront him until now after 3-4 people start pressuring you. ..this whole section doesn't make any sense at all if he is actually interested in why i think Palmar is mafia (because it just doesn't matter and i can't possibly be mafia for him because of this as he has asked me to explain my Palmar read -- why would he care about my Palmar read or what it is based on if he thinks i am already mafia because i didn't explain it earlier). It's like a big blop of fluff where nothing makes any sense and all the roads lead to me being mafia regardless of what i say. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
1) rayn is mafia for what HF said 2) expalin your read on PAlmar 3) votes for me 4) i explain 5) see i didn't care about your explanation at all, because you're still mafia. In different order this could make some sense but here (especially with the vote coming around the time it did) it makes literally no sense at all because at that time he is both interested in my reasoning and still isn't. | ||
| ||
