|
Ruxxar and Oats have shown the let's leave a message here and disappear sort of approach, which raises flags to my eyes. I like Damdred
We definitely need to hear from some other posters. I know, I know, it's only been a few hours but I'm so angsty.
On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately  Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers
That's unfortunate. You will find soon enough that life is not about easy choices.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Cool ruxxar town with me.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Shame damd is mafia for realising that pro strat though. I don't even know how many mafia there are and I don't think he usually reads ops either.
Maybe.
|
why is Stan scum again? is this some sort of aggressive pressure to get some info?
|
On November 19 2017 09:19 Holyflare wrote:
Shame damd is mafia for realising that pro strat though. I don't even know how many mafia there are and I don't think he usually reads ops either.
Maybe.
RIP the dream, but at least hf recognizes my brilliance.
|
On November 19 2017 09:03 Z-BosoN wrote:Ruxxar and Oats have shown the let's leave a message here and disappear sort of approach, which raises flags to my eyes. I like Damdred We definitely need to hear from some other posters. I know, I know, it's only been a few hours but I'm so angsty. Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers That's unfortunate. You will find soon enough that life is not about easy choices.
What do you think of his answer on his lynch order?
|
On November 19 2017 01:16 Damdred wrote:
##lynch ve at twilight today
On November 19 2017 05:32 Damdred wrote:
First, confirmed town
On November 19 2017 05:33 Damdred wrote:
dammit just first on this page, oats is mafia though so life is easy
On November 19 2017 05:41 Damdred wrote:
Oats did make me laugh with his witty personity so dont think i want to lynch him today XD.
My heart.
Why so downcast?
The ails of hopes deferred shall in time fade by a tree of life.
Knowing so, you still ache as a woman before birth and a runner mid race.
Lynch today I hear
First town
First mafia
Lynch today I hear
The response. Speaks more than the pain. The reaction lasts beyond the incident, thus is of more importance.
It tells of the condition.
The diagnosis is that we are not well. How will we address this sickness? That is of significance.
I call for help to Him whom can.
|
On November 19 2017 10:38 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 09:03 Z-BosoN wrote:Ruxxar and Oats have shown the let's leave a message here and disappear sort of approach, which raises flags to my eyes. I like Damdred We definitely need to hear from some other posters. I know, I know, it's only been a few hours but I'm so angsty. On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers That's unfortunate. You will find soon enough that life is not about easy choices. What do you think of his answer on his lynch order?
His lynch order doesn't really matter, but I am concerned he was a tad bit too defensive. Kinda felt like he felt pressured to come up with scum lists. Peaced out afterwards.
KelsierSC is all passive and non-committal despite being fairly active, which I don't like, so I'm really interested to see how he will progress.
On November 19 2017 09:27 Conversion wrote:
why is Stan scum again? is this some sort of aggressive pressure to get some info?
Well, props to answering your own question. He did give a response to which you said nothing about. Do you agree with my dislike of his response? Does it ... tempt you?
|
On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers
I don't see anything damdred has done that warrants him lynchable, so I don't really get anything from him
You're allowed to dislike whatever you want, my friend.
|
surprised oats isn't calling people scum/bad left and right for once though
|
The game goes on.
People trolling.
People talking nonsense.
Pretending their nonsense has meaning.
Arguing on little, so the big is hidden in smoke.
Yet here I am.
Am I also a spewer if nonsense?
Honesty is rare in these game if only coming by in a joking manner.
Yet here I am.
Hiding behind a persona. Knowing transparency would be my demise.
Today is one of those days I question my ways. Prudent I have heard.
Speaking plainly is not a well known option among the champions of these realms.
Perhaps there is a way to play with honesty. I could always be truthful of that which I do not want to disclose.
I could say my reads are confidential. My role is classified. I could play a defensive and honest game. I believe the telling of my reads will skew other town players thoughts and do not want to steer the town the wrong way unless I'm more confident. Of course, town will say no one is ever 100% confident in this game.... except for a few particular individuals who are even if they were wrong. Which begs the questions if they really were. If they had enough faith, could what they believe come to being? If it were just your faith alone, how would you explain being blindsided in life? This is where the positive thinking movements falls negative.
Honesty... speaking of faith without a troll. Is speaking with troll cowardly on such subjects? To hide behind personas the same as masks? Is it the same when you let everyone know you're acting and pretending? Though some may retrospectively say they were joking when an offense was taken. This is not good.
Deeper subjects is much more worthy of discussion to decide who to lynch than activity and grammar. The content and heart of the matter is more important. Let us stop looking merely at the outward appearance of paragraphs and color texts.
So, we shall have a debate. The first topic is this:
Shall we have a debate on a deep subject to determine who we shall lunch rather than rely on jokes and giggles?
I will watch the debate and choose a winner. The response to the debate which is of a greater matter as spoken of earlier will be of surprise. Let's play mafia with deep debate. Try a new game of one of you had desires. Else you risk a game of bore.
|
On November 19 2017 11:23 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers I don't see anything damdred has done that warrants him lynchable, so I don't really get anything from him You're allowed to dislike whatever you want, my friend.
Honesty on the deeper matters.
The last remark. How does that help with cconversion?
Also, how long have you two been friends?
|
On November 19 2017 11:23 Conversion wrote:
surprised oats isn't calling people scum/bad left and right for once though
Is this good, bad, or neutral? This surprise.. or do you even know? Are you just taking notes?
|
On November 19 2017 11:17 Z-BosoN wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 10:38 Damdred wrote:On November 19 2017 09:03 Z-BosoN wrote:Ruxxar and Oats have shown the let's leave a message here and disappear sort of approach, which raises flags to my eyes. I like Damdred We definitely need to hear from some other posters. I know, I know, it's only been a few hours but I'm so angsty. On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers That's unfortunate. You will find soon enough that life is not about easy choices. What do you think of his answer on his lynch order? His lynch order doesn't really matter, but I am concerned he was a tad bit too defensive. Kinda felt like he felt pressured to come up with scum lists. Peaced out afterwards. KelsierSC is all passive and non-committal despite being fairly active, which I don't like, so I'm really interested to see how he will progress. Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 09:27 Conversion wrote:
why is Stan scum again? is this some sort of aggressive pressure to get some info? Well, props to answering your own question. He did give a response to which you said nothing about. Do you agree with my dislike of his response? Does it ... tempt you?
I see your questions and I question your questions. Do you love probing questions? Has this been successful in your mafia finding strategies in the past?
|
On November 19 2017 09:27 Conversion wrote:
why is Stan scum again? is this some sort of aggressive pressure to get some info?
Has anyone notice the amount of questions this game?
Do you think we should be questioning these questions?
Does asking questions and answering questions with questions hide your true motives and draw attend to the question instead of the individual unless the question is about someone or the question is so questionable that it begs to question?
|
On November 19 2017 11:46 Chezinu wrote:
The game goes on.
People trolling.
People talking nonsense.
Pretending their nonsense has meaning.
Arguing on little, so the big is hidden in smoke.
Yet here I am.
Am I also a spewer if nonsense?
Honesty is rare in these game if only coming by in a joking manner.
Yet here I am.
Hiding behind a persona. Knowing transparency would be my demise.
Today is one of those days I question my ways. Prudent I have heard.
Speaking plainly is not a well known option among the champions of these realms.
Perhaps there is a way to play with honesty. I could always be truthful of that which I do not want to disclose.
I could say my reads are confidential. My role is classified. I could play a defensive and honest game. I believe the telling of my reads will skew other town players thoughts and do not want to steer the town the wrong way unless I'm more confident. Of course, town will say no one is ever 100% confident in this game.... except for a few particular individuals who are even if they were wrong. Which begs the questions if they really were. If they had enough faith, could what they believe come to being? If it were just your faith alone, how would you explain being blindsided in life? This is where the positive thinking movements falls negative.
Honesty... speaking of faith without a troll. Is speaking with troll cowardly on such subjects? To hide behind personas the same as masks? Is it the same when you let everyone know you're acting and pretending? Though some may retrospectively say they were joking when an offense was taken. This is not good.
Deeper subjects is much more worthy of discussion to decide who to lynch than activity and grammar. The content and heart of the matter is more important. Let us stop looking merely at the outward appearance of paragraphs and color texts.
So, we shall have a debate. The first topic is this:
Shall we have a debate on a deep subject to determine who we shall lunch rather than rely on jokes and giggles?
I will watch the debate and choose a winner. The response to the debate which is of a greater matter as spoken of earlier will be of surprise. Let's play mafia with deep debate. Try a new game of one of you had desires. Else you risk a game of bore.
And so you've spoken. Let it be heard. Let us debate then, man of purpose.
Until there are more people on the board, I favor a lynch of policy. Silence is an unwelcome demon, and should not be emphasized in this light.
Though I am a bit curious. Explain please, to a simple mind, what the true meaning of the post you produced earlier. Are you expressing concern, since your reads must stay silent?
On November 19 2017 10:42 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 05:33 Damdred wrote:
dammit just first on this page, oats is mafia though so life is easy Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 05:41 Damdred wrote:
Oats did make me laugh with his witty personity so dont think i want to lynch him today XD. My heart. Why so downcast? The ails of hopes deferred shall in time fade by a tree of life. Knowing so, you still ache as a woman before birth and a runner mid race. Lynch today I hear First town First mafia Lynch today I hear The response. Speaks more than the pain. The reaction lasts beyond the incident, thus is of more importance. It tells of the condition. The diagnosis is that we are not well. How will we address this sickness? That is of significance. I call for help to Him whom can.
|
On November 19 2017 11:49 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 11:23 Conversion wrote:On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers I don't see anything damdred has done that warrants him lynchable, so I don't really get anything from him You're allowed to dislike whatever you want, my friend. Honesty on the deeper matters. The last remark. How does that help with cconversion? Also, how long have you two been friends?
I've never met this z-boson guy. I don't know what you're trying to say with your first question
On November 19 2017 11:51 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 11:23 Conversion wrote:
surprised oats isn't calling people scum/bad left and right for once though Is this good, bad, or neutral? This surprise.. or do you even know? Are you just taking notes?
neutral. dude might be busy, but his start is definitely one of the most consistent things, and he's not doing it this game so just taking notes
|
On November 19 2017 11:53 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 11:17 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 10:38 Damdred wrote:On November 19 2017 09:03 Z-BosoN wrote:Ruxxar and Oats have shown the let's leave a message here and disappear sort of approach, which raises flags to my eyes. I like Damdred We definitely need to hear from some other posters. I know, I know, it's only been a few hours but I'm so angsty. On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers That's unfortunate. You will find soon enough that life is not about easy choices. What do you think of his answer on his lynch order? His lynch order doesn't really matter, but I am concerned he was a tad bit too defensive. Kinda felt like he felt pressured to come up with scum lists. Peaced out afterwards. KelsierSC is all passive and non-committal despite being fairly active, which I don't like, so I'm really interested to see how he will progress. On November 19 2017 09:27 Conversion wrote:
why is Stan scum again? is this some sort of aggressive pressure to get some info? Well, props to answering your own question. He did give a response to which you said nothing about. Do you agree with my dislike of his response? Does it ... tempt you? I see your questions and I question your questions. Do you love probing questions? Has this been successful in your mafia finding strategies in the past?
I do love probing questions. As to the success, I cannot testify, but I do presume it is better than sitting still. The questions do not distract anything else because there is nothing to distract from.
Hopefully that answers your question and inspires newer, fresher ones.
|
On November 19 2017 07:31 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 06:59 Z-BosoN wrote:
KelsierSC, explain yourself. Are you pretending to engage in this banter in order to excuse yourself from posting?
Other than that, Stanislav Petrov seems like utter scum.
# Vote Stanislav Petrov
Am I pretending to post to avoid posting?
Are you questioning the questioner?
|
On November 19 2017 12:01 Z-BosoN wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2017 11:53 Chezinu wrote:On November 19 2017 11:17 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 10:38 Damdred wrote:On November 19 2017 09:03 Z-BosoN wrote:Ruxxar and Oats have shown the let's leave a message here and disappear sort of approach, which raises flags to my eyes. I like Damdred We definitely need to hear from some other posters. I know, I know, it's only been a few hours but I'm so angsty. On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers That's unfortunate. You will find soon enough that life is not about easy choices. What do you think of his answer on his lynch order? His lynch order doesn't really matter, but I am concerned he was a tad bit too defensive. Kinda felt like he felt pressured to come up with scum lists. Peaced out afterwards. KelsierSC is all passive and non-committal despite being fairly active, which I don't like, so I'm really interested to see how he will progress. On November 19 2017 09:27 Conversion wrote:
why is Stan scum again? is this some sort of aggressive pressure to get some info? Well, props to answering your own question. He did give a response to which you said nothing about. Do you agree with my dislike of his response? Does it ... tempt you? I see your questions and I question your questions. Do you love probing questions? Has this been successful in your mafia finding strategies in the past? I do love probing questions. As to the success, I cannot testify, but I do presume it is better than sitting still. The questions do not distract anything else because there is nothing to distract from. Hopefully that answers your question and inspires newer, fresher ones.
I heard of science that a question multiplies when answers are sought. Does the amount of questions correlate to answer seeking individuals? Are researchers more incline to question openly? What percentage are secret questions, which are kept in the minds of the questioner as they read the thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
