|
On July 13 2017 20:55 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 20:53 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 20:50 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 08:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 08:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 08:01 ruXxar wrote: And if geript is lynched I wouldn't shed a single tear. On July 13 2017 08:03 ruXxar wrote: He looks worse than the rest. Aka Poe so far. I am gonna say this is a big pile of bullshit because half of the game hasn't even posted yet so you -- as town -- can't have a single idea of if geript is town or mafia by PoE. This statement is clearly bullshit because I can only Poe people that have posted so far. Also, 1+1 = 2, more news at 11. You posted this. Why couldn't damdred do the same? Because damdred clearly said he wanted to lynch rsoul based on meta activity and *not* based on the post she actually made. There's an important distinction here that is crucial to my argument. His read was nothing about activity. It was dull, boring and not interactive.
How is a person with 1 post supposed to be "interactive"?
|
On July 13 2017 20:59 Holyflare wrote: Hey rayn. If you thought the case ruxxar posted to ec was good and ec didn't answer it properly why do you not engage ec on it? Good point.
|
On July 13 2017 20:59 Holyflare wrote: Hey rayn. If you thought the case ruxxar posted to ec was good and ec didn't answer it properly why do you not engage ec on it? because i don't think the case was particularly good. i think the post was good, the observation was townie imo. i don't think EC not answering it makes him mafia, especially after how he seems to be approaching the situations in this game -- aka looking them from a completely different view.
Like Skynx just created a narrative for where my actions fit. They don't, if you actually look behind why i am posting what i am. I am not really gonna say anything more about it, you can believe him if you want to, but that just makes you bad.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 21:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 20:55 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 20:53 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 20:50 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 08:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 08:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 08:01 ruXxar wrote: And if geript is lynched I wouldn't shed a single tear. On July 13 2017 08:03 ruXxar wrote: He looks worse than the rest. Aka Poe so far. I am gonna say this is a big pile of bullshit because half of the game hasn't even posted yet so you -- as town -- can't have a single idea of if geript is town or mafia by PoE. This statement is clearly bullshit because I can only Poe people that have posted so far. Also, 1+1 = 2, more news at 11. You posted this. Why couldn't damdred do the same? Because damdred clearly said he wanted to lynch rsoul based on meta activity and *not* based on the post she actually made. There's an important distinction here that is crucial to my argument. His read was nothing about activity. It was dull, boring and not interactive. How is a person with 1 post supposed to be "interactive"?
Make a read and interact with a person instead of saying hi and leaving. It's not that she has one post but what she did with her time here that he's commenting on.
|
what i mean is i don't think that makes EC mafia, but i think it is a townie observation to make, it is a townie makes that observation like 70% of the time regardless of it's truth value.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 21:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: what i mean is i don't think that makes EC mafia, but i think it is a townie observation to make, it is a townie makes that observation like 70% of the time regardless of it's truth value.
So we're in the 30% right now?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Give me a quick one line read list rayn.
|
On July 13 2017 21:05 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 21:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: what i mean is i don't think that makes EC mafia, but i think it is a townie observation to make, it is a townie makes that observation like 70% of the time regardless of it's truth value. So we're in the 30% right now? yes. as i said it would make ruxxar town but after he himself proved he thought he was onto something (see his answer to my post soon after) he just decided to do nothing with it.
I mean like, have you ever seen a townie who thinks they have a good case and then just do nothing with it? I havent.
|
On July 13 2017 21:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 20:59 Holyflare wrote: Hey rayn. If you thought the case ruxxar posted to ec was good and ec didn't answer it properly why do you not engage ec on it? because i don't think the case was particularly good. i think the post was good, the observation was townie imo.i don't think EC not answering it makes him mafia, especially after how he seems to be approaching the situations in this game -- aka looking them from a completely different view. Like Skynx just created a narrative for where my actions fit. They don't, if you actually look behind why i am posting what i am. I am not really gonna say anything more about it, you can believe him if you want to, but that just makes you bad.  You gona have to expand on the bolded. You called it the best post in the thread. If the case wasn't good why do you expect him to keep pushing EC? Doesn't pushing someone with bad reasons suggest mafia agenda?
|
On July 13 2017 21:05 Holyflare wrote: Give me a quick one line read list rayn.
emperorchampion Skynx Damdred - i am going to agree with Koshi here Koshi Holyflare
VayneAuthority - hasn't posted
Rels - boooring Tumblewood - booring, can't tell, he does these retarded "i see an argument -> i am just gonna say it's tvt" as both alignment
sicklucker - not sure for reasons i dont wanna discuss yet
rsoultin geript ruXxar
|
Post good/case not good/observation townie. You're all over the place man.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 21:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 21:05 Holyflare wrote: Give me a quick one line read list rayn. emperorchampion Skynx Damdred - i am going to agree with Koshi here Koshi Holyflare VayneAuthority - hasn't posted Rels - boooring Tumblewood - booring, can't tell, he does these retarded "i see an argument -> i am just gonna say it's tvt" as both alignment sicklucker - not sure for reasons i dont wanna discuss yet rsoultin geript ruXxar
You're going to agree with koshi despite what I said?
|
On July 13 2017 21:08 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 21:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 20:59 Holyflare wrote: Hey rayn. If you thought the case ruxxar posted to ec was good and ec didn't answer it properly why do you not engage ec on it? because i don't think the case was particularly good. i think the post was good, the observation was townie imo.i don't think EC not answering it makes him mafia, especially after how he seems to be approaching the situations in this game -- aka looking them from a completely different view. Like Skynx just created a narrative for where my actions fit. They don't, if you actually look behind why i am posting what i am. I am not really gonna say anything more about it, you can believe him if you want to, but that just makes you bad.  You gona have to expand on the bolded. You called it the best post in the thread. If the case wasn't good why do you expect him to keep pushing EC? Doesn't pushing someone with bad reasons suggest mafia agenda? because he clearly thought the case is good. like your case on me is trash but i still don't think you are mafia. it's a townie post.
those two things are completely different. so please do not compare them, that's how you end up lynching townies.
|
On July 13 2017 21:11 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 21:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 21:05 Holyflare wrote: Give me a quick one line read list rayn. emperorchampion Skynx Damdred - i am going to agree with Koshi here Koshi Holyflare VayneAuthority - hasn't posted Rels - boooring Tumblewood - booring, can't tell, he does these retarded "i see an argument -> i am just gonna say it's tvt" as both alignment sicklucker - not sure for reasons i dont wanna discuss yet rsoultin geript ruXxar You're going to agree with koshi despite what I said? yes, i spent like half an hour reading Damdred's past games after making the "idk what damdred is" post.
|
On July 13 2017 21:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 21:05 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 21:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: what i mean is i don't think that makes EC mafia, but i think it is a townie observation to make, it is a townie makes that observation like 70% of the time regardless of it's truth value. So we're in the 30% right now? yes. as i said it would make ruxxar town but after he himself proved he thought he was onto something (see his answer to my post soon after) he just decided to do nothing with it. I mean like, have you ever seen a townie who thinks they have a good case and then just do nothing with it? I havent.
Like I already said, I was excited to point out what I thought was an inconsistency.
Doesn't mean I have a case.
|
wow insomnia im so fucked today. what do you want ryan
|
On July 13 2017 21:15 sicklucker wrote: wow insomnia im so fucked today. what do you want ryan why are you voting for ruxxar?
|
I voted ruxxar because he had the best chance to be scum and Im not sure if Ill have much time or when even the deadline is. I took your advice TAKE THE BANANA
|
Why did you not take my bait and react when I voted you?
|
On July 13 2017 21:19 sicklucker wrote: Why did you not take my bait and react when I voted you? because i know it was a bait and doesnt accomplish anything
i am trying to figure out why you say this:
On July 13 2017 18:37 sicklucker wrote: my only problem with voting rexxar this early is that he was such a easy town read with volumn last game. does not seem like your greatest day one lynch
On July 13 2017 18:46 sicklucker wrote: holy shit rstoulins posts are annoying but in a trying to be cute way. someones been posting somewhere and then vote for ruxxar instead?
|
|
|
|