EPTOn June 22 2017 05:36 Grackaroni wrote:
Hey what's the ETA on that post game analysis?
Hey what's the ETA on that post game analysis?
Um, maybe gimme a couple weeks after this game is wrapped up lol
[N] TL Mafia LXXV - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
Um, maybe gimme a couple weeks after this game is wrapped up lol | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 05:45 disformation wrote: yup we really want the info from today WHAT NO this is garbage logic what we want from today is A LYNCH ON SCUM | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 05:45 Grackaroni wrote: What info are you getting out of this? Lynching for info is dumb and anyone who says we're doing it is either bad or scum or both | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
So what, it was a fake push? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 07:13 Chezitwo wrote: If grack is mafia then this is a heavy bus by the way. No way that he goes down like this while his teammates aren't on board. Speaking of "not on board" - wtf is this shit Palmar vote disformation? I left the steering of this town to you?! Even if Grack flips town it seems likely Mafia would be on board also. There are a LOT of votes on Grack right now. the only people who weren't voting grack at an important time are like Rels, Skynx, Chez... Grack So unless that list literally contains all the remaining scum, there is likely at LEAST one scum on the Grack Wagon, or Wagrackon as I call it. And this is regardless as to the Grack alignment | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
The opposite of a bus, being what? Mafia voting for Town? Are you defending Grack? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
??? why would this make you mad tho, this makes things very easy | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
WHY DID NOBODY LISTEN TO ME | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
Ok gonna admit I have some egg on my face here since my voting Grack did secure the lynch. but please bear in mind that, we all make mistakes, and just because Grack made a huge mistake in getting voted by me doesn't mean we should do anything too hasty here | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 08:05 Chezitwo wrote: Why did I even stay up for this shitshow. ...you had to know. That's why I'm here too. I couldn't bring myself not to be here | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 08:07 Fecalfeast wrote: So my.hunch was that ruxxar was a cop with a red check on grack. Now I'm thinking we have no investigative roles or something like a watcher/tracker who have no useful checks.... Wtf man. I'm pushing ruxxar all day tomorrow We've had a wanderer and a miller and a Mafia RB. It seems plausible to me that we have some kind of investigative role. However, we shouldn't automatically assume its type or whatever | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 08:14 disformation wrote: well. good news: nearly any shot gives town some information now. I mean this is mostly a sign that we fucked up but yeah, this is good news. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
I hope you're drinking to celebrate the EM majority! http://i.imgur.com/Gjn4KIK.png | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 08:37 Rels wrote: I thought that was not your reason to scumread me ? Yes I was asking him what he thought of that | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 08:40 Palmar wrote: I forgot Vivax is bad. That's on me I am always keenly aware of this fact. He did, last game, as a VT, fakeclaim a red check on our vigi during D2. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On June 22 2017 08:42 Rels wrote: Why did you answer me "LOL it this really your reasonning" then ? It seems like what I've said at that point was wrong but it was actually true. ...I said it because I disagreed with your reasoning, and instead agreed with my own. It was like, making fun of you. I was calling your reasoning bad. You were trying to reason that MY reasoning was bad, and I was like "no, YOUR reasoning is bad". Then, I proceeded to ask someone else about my, good, reasoning. Do you not understand this thought process here? | ||
| ||
