|
On June 09 2017 07:21 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2017 07:10 Holyflare wrote:On June 09 2017 07:09 Grackaroni wrote:On June 09 2017 07:07 Holyflare wrote:On June 09 2017 06:58 Grackaroni wrote:On June 09 2017 06:57 Holyflare wrote:
but that's not what I asked
u scum? I don't give a shit what you asked. Those are my reasons for killing Ritoky and I like them. yes but I'm just going to flat out tell you that your posts and case on him and everything that led you to having a fight with ritoky was absolutely bad all ritoky said was that he liked an onegu point against you and that caused him to read your filter and pick out some posts and then you went full retard and cased him, made an entire narrative and then tried to bury him a whole day based on HIS fidei posts when he wasn't even particularly building any case around your reads on fidei (the thing that made him check you) so no, you are the one guilty of this narrative crap you keep throwing ? On June 06 2017 17:25 Holyflare wrote:I don't think grack's push is that great and I don't think ritoky's is either  On June 06 2017 18:29 Holyflare wrote:On June 06 2017 17:25 Holyflare wrote:I don't think grack's push is that great and I don't think ritoky's is either Actually grack's push has merit. It's not totally awful. But I think it's misguided for now. We're lynching vivax. I actually read the start of it now instead of halfway through the conversation Let me get this whole turn of events correct, tell me if I'm wrong: 1. Fidei flips 2. Ritoky quotes onegu post and reads grack filter Grack smells bullshit in post3. Ritoky pulls out quotes that say grack looks scummy 4. grack pulls out lack of fidei posts for some reason to say ritoky is scummy 5. shit fight ensues
|
On June 09 2017 07:24 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2017 07:14 Grackaroni wrote:
Clearly something set me off about Ritoky's mention of the Onegu post or I wouldn't have made my framing post as soon as I saw it. That's townie reaction not "justification after the facts" which is too obscure of an argument for me to really refute. yes but he made that post pulling out things that seemed contradictory and then YOU DID THE SAME THING with his lack of fidei quotes and called him scummy because of it????
BECAUSE HE MADE THE QUOTE.
|
On June 09 2017 07:25 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2017 07:25 Grackaroni wrote:On June 09 2017 07:24 Holyflare wrote:On June 09 2017 07:14 Grackaroni wrote:
Clearly something set me off about Ritoky's mention of the Onegu post or I wouldn't have made my framing post as soon as I saw it. That's townie reaction not "justification after the facts" which is too obscure of an argument for me to really refute. yes but he made that post pulling out things that seemed contradictory and then YOU DID THE SAME THING with his lack of fidei quotes and called him scummy because of it???? BECAUSE HE MADE THE QUOTE. what quote???
The onegu quote.
It was a scummy, unjustified transition into a scum read, and I thought it was bullshit then before he even said a word against me aside from that.
|
What you don't seem to understand is that I wouldn't draw any attention at all to Ritoky's connections with Fidei if he hadn't said that.
|
I tried to talk about this earlier in my filter.
I understand Onegu finding it interesting that I hadn't mentioned Fidei because he was tunneled on Fidei. It's totally different for someone who didn't pay any attention to Fidei or say anything about Fidei to try to use Onegu to preface an attack on me.
If I had known that Fidei was scum on day 1 and that Ritoky had said that I would have called him on it.
|
I think some of Ritoky's accusations are fine.
I thought Fidei was town earlier in the day because he was pestering me for reads in a way that I thought would be coming from a townie. That impression wore off over time and I can agree with that being scummy.
I clearly was sheeping Tumblewood from like Onegu to PB to Fidei and for some reason he interprets that as me having a boner for PB. Maybe a misunderstanding. Maybe purposely misconstrued.
Then there are other things that are fluffed up nonsense that I think he says because he thinks they sound good rather than because he thinks they are good. Making snap conclusions and then justifications to suit my narrative is one of them, since what mafia plays like that?
|
You watching the UK elections?
|
On June 09 2017 07:56 Holyflare wrote:of course
So what's the deal if she doesn't get a majority people will call for her to resign as head of the party?
Why are your leaders are always calling for votes and then resigning?
|
I follow the Tory = Republican minus the extreme religious nutjobbery. Corbyn = Sanders comparisons.
What's more confusing to me is why she gets the power to just decide to hold an election in the first place and can just do so when the moment seems favorable for her party.
|
On June 09 2017 08:43 Holyflare wrote:
who is gonna dieeeeeeeeeee
You.
|
lol maybe I'll actually look at filters tomorrow in between my shit fighting.
|
^
I was just about to say that.
|
|
|
nooo kill Ritoky. I pay well.
|
lol why didn't you shoot.
|
Or you could have just killed one of the people less likely to be town and been confirmed town?
|
VT is vanilla town. It's probably just TW/HF but if there's a third claim then there should be 1 scum in that group.
|
On June 09 2017 11:25 Conversion wrote:
wait but shouldn't there be a cop with a godfather? because what's the point of having a godfather (fidei) if there's no cop.. just a fancy title?
No sometimes hosts put things like GF with no cop to prevent people from being able to make conclusions like that in role claims. They also may have just randomized the roles.
|
On June 09 2017 11:35 Conversion wrote:
oh okay sorry I'm like not reading before I post.
so the scenarios can be:
TW is doctor HF is vigi, makes it a balanced set up because we don't have a mislynch. Fidei is godfather to mindgame town into trying to figure out if there's a cop or not.
We have 3 claims. A doctor, vigi, and third role (most likely cop?). In which case we try to figure out who's fakeclaiming in this case (my suspicion goes to TW because like.. dude you're not doing anything and you probably fakeclaimed to save yourself and maybe try to out the real doctor as well)
I mean I don't really want to give TW a pass but if no one else is claiming, he is the real doctor, right? Or is a one blue, RB/godfather setup likely as well? Sorry for the questions, and thanks for answering them grack/LS! Just making sure I understand this stuff before I make a push based on things happening before
Yeah I agree with all of what you said. The standard is usually 2 blues for 13 player games.
|
On June 09 2017 11:43 ritoky wrote:
At work on break so I can't type much or go retrieve my crumbs from my filter, but BTDT & grack
Quick reasoning, my case on BTDT day 1 + he emo'd me and I didn't want to be fooled by it. Considered switching to grack or LS. Day 2 grack because obvious reasons.
HAHA sucker!!!!!
Now I have to kill Tumblewood though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
