[M][N] Generic Mini Mafia II - Page 2

On May 10 2017 17:18 Palmar wrote:

I don't work with scum

On May 10 2017 16:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:

How about you play the game instead of this shit?
Did you just say you made a series of posts that indicate -- no, literally say, you found the first thing in the game that interests you yet you cannot make a single conclusion out of it?

On May 10 2017 16:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay that makes sense. I am really not trying to twist anything you say into anything else. I just saw you making a post, thought about what it indicates (correctly ) and it didn't make any sense to me. Since really, i know my own alignment and even if fuba is mafia there is no reason anyone of you three would most likely respond differently, therefore your conclusion didn't make much sense to me -- and looked more to be like what i said.

Obviously Tumblewood and you can question me for a read you don't understand or don't get. At first you just seemed to be doing it "wrong", you know what i mean? I don't think it makes you mafia, i just want you to be clear in what you say and not cryptic because i don't wanna guess what you say. I want people to lay out stuff clear so i can just focus on making conclusions on that said stuff.

rn I am most interested in on how Holyflare thinks anything of what i have said possibly makes me mafia.

On May 10 2017 17:34 Palmar wrote:

If you think he is town why are you pestering him?

On May 10 2017 17:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:

No. I was attacking you because you didn't seem to have a conclusion. You should have had one (since you made a post that indicated so in the first place). When you told what your conclusion is, it didn't make any sense. I have never said you shouldn't have any conclusion because i figured you must have one -- otherwise the first post made no sense at all. People can obviously make dumb/wrong conclusions, that doesn't make anyone mafia. I just wanted to know where you were coming from and the more we discussed it the clearer it became to me where you are coming from and that it makes probably more sense from town perspective.

On May 07 2017 01:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You shouldn't, me Palmar and Holyflare will fuck up and kill each other and you'll just cruise to victory.

On May 10 2017 18:06 Palmar wrote:

You're still at it, you literally just said something is fishy about some of his posts.

This could be just a poor choice of words by you, but if you believe that "Rayn is in a rage induced tunnel", rayn is 100% town to you 100% of the time. Mafia does not go into rage induced tunnels. They might fake it, and there is usually evidence they are faking it.

It's especially unlikely someone whose play is as refined as rayn's (well, as refined as a bludgeon can be) would go on a tilt as scum.

So either you must say that he's indeed NOT on a rage induced tunnel, but rather attempting to play one, or that he's town. There is no world where rayn is scum in a rage induced tunnel.

Also I don't like this pseudo-alliance-making.

On May 10 2017 18:13 Palmar wrote:


Yes, but you've kept sort of poking him, which is bound to do nothing productive if you think he's town.

Are you claiming that when you wrote "he's in a rage induced tunnel" you thought he was town, and then when you "something is fishy" you were back on leaning scum?

I'll go back and read the timeline later but using a timeline defense doesn't sounds like it adds up.

On May 10 2017 18:45 Palmar wrote:

nice.

meta and appeal to other players defense.

noted.

On May 10 2017 18:47 Palmar wrote:

I don't answer scum questions.

On May 10 2017 18:50 Palmar wrote:
I think I'm going to vote you and see how it feels. Maybe it'll feel good, I don't know. So many things yet unanswered.

On May 11 2017 00:06 Prison Break wrote:


I don't like this post

You come in here, don't take sides or stances, make a general comment to seem townie and helpful by solving a fight (yet you don't really solve it, because you set it up in a way that you keep all your options open), then you leave again (?)

Your vote is on Fuba, yet you lack explanation, again, leaving your options open. You could go "it was pressure" or "it was a joke" or "RVS", but at the same time if a wagon on fuba starts you could spin it like it was your intention all along

I think you're scum

On May 10 2017 22:55 Tumblewood wrote:
lmao grack is having way too much fun to be scum

On May 11 2017 03:42 Vivax wrote:
And Grack what's that quality post thingy lmao, not sure if you started out serious and then realized most of you didn't even post a single substantial thing yet or if you were shitposting from the beginning

On May 11 2017 04:41 Holyflare wrote:


And what about his read on me? He basically dropped a bunch of shit saying something he can't possibly believe and then ignored all his reasons for it and said nothing more about it.

Alsoooo do you have any suspicion that rayn is mafia right now?

On May 11 2017 04:50 Vivax wrote:


Eh I'm looking into grack and tw mostly. HF doesn't seem like mafia, nor do rayn and Palmar at first glance. So I'm mostly not paying attention to the posts they adress at each other.

So much for how caught up I am. Not fully, I'd like to see Grack explain his posts in the rayn convo cause they don't make much sense to me atm.

What would you like to talk about