[T][M] Resistance VI - Page 43
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On February 05 2017 07:45 Grackaroni wrote: Even if it probably wasn't all town it's still a free success. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On February 05 2017 02:36 emperorchampion wrote: I still don't fully understand how stubborn = scum, but w/e. I'm pretty surprised that no one else voted down the mission apart from super. sl voting pass is pretty lulz Pass or fail I'd eat my shorts if there isn't one scum on that team. No way any tinfoil team is baby sealing at this point in the game. Pretty much that would mean it's super/tumble/sl which is quite unlikely to me. u mad? | ||
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
Can I have a show of hands who thought that last mission was going to pass before the vote was shown? its important for data | ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On February 05 2017 07:50 RtaniSoul wrote: Same mission but with us. Ez win. thats what a mafia artanis would say :D. include someone else | ||
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
On February 05 2017 07:51 sicklucker wrote: thats why its sometimes good to vote unexpectly its quite possible mafia assumed I was going to vote no on this mission. in this world its possible super and ec are mafia. altho thats only one possible scenario. Even tho im sure scum thought I was going to vote no on that they still needed more no votes. Can I have a show of hands who thought that last mission was going to pass before the vote was shown? its important for data We were pretty sure it would, yeah. | ||
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
On February 05 2017 07:52 sicklucker wrote: thats what a mafia artanis would say :D. include someone else Because a town artanis wouldn't say this..? | ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
what exactly do you want us to say? to acknowledge that there could be scum there deciding not to fail the mission? of course. but why should we make that assumption when there's no real evidence to suggest it? if i were scum, and an all-town team had gone through, and especially if some town were getting wobbly about the vote, i'd be busting my ass to sow doubt so people went with others on the team myself gonna need a pretty good reason (not just too many people voted yes) to make me squeamish about a passed mission. sorry | ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
On February 05 2017 07:59 sicklucker wrote: ritanisoul is probably not the worst 4th add on looking at the list tho. maybe even the best Why's that? | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
On February 05 2017 08:03 Superbia wrote: actually adding rtsoul may not be too bad. Explain yourself | ||
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
| ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
Somethign like you're likely town and can bring fire if the 4 man fails. If I get added and it fails I get a lot of pressure put on me and I have no intention of needing to try hard. :D And if it's all town I (we) win regardless. | ||
| ||