|
|
|
So is this game gonna go or are we waiting?
|
On January 06 2017 09:06 Kmatt wrote:Could you not
lets act like ive never played mafia for a min: why? and i dont want to hear the "oh it narrows PR" crap (yes this is a vaild reason but anyone will argue this). Yes it is sub optimal in general but why are you opposed to it?
also obligatory vote silverwolf
now onto something i want everyone to answer
are you town?
how long have you played mafia?
do you play elsewhere and if so where?
What is your typical play style?
how do you scumhunt/townhunt?
do you know anyone here that you can read very well?
to answer my own:
yes
about 4-5 years now on and off now
my typical style is to kinda talk to people and interact with others to try to get reads. most times it helps to have someone i know so i can quickly bounce with someone if they are town or lynch them if they are scum (hi silver)
kinda said as above, but to summarize it i hunt though interactions most of the time
yes, i can read silverwolf very well though watching and having interactions.
|
On January 06 2017 09:25 SilverWolf77 wrote:
Hi all!!!!
Hi silverwolf! could you answer my questions?
|
On January 06 2017 09:26 KelsierSC wrote:
weird simultaneous posting
Who?
|
On January 06 2017 09:28 Calix wrote:
Think he's referring to you and SW.
(ika/ SW know each other IRL iirc)
yup. we live together (ive informed mod before signing up to make sure it was ok) so if one of us is around the other most likely is. and if anyone has concerns: my computer is downstairs and hers is upstairs
|
On January 06 2017 09:28 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:27 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 09:26 KelsierSC wrote:
weird simultaneous posting Who? you and silver, probably a coincidence just looked like a planned entrance.
should of quoted you too in it but you can read above
and ppl plz answer the questions i have aksed too
|
On January 06 2017 09:33 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:31 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 09:28 Calix wrote:
Think he's referring to you and SW.
(ika/ SW know each other IRL iirc) yup. we live together (ive informed mod before signing up to make sure it was ok) so if one of us is around the other most likely is. and if anyone has concerns: my computer is downstairs and hers is upstairs nice Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:32 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 09:28 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 09:27 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 09:26 KelsierSC wrote:
weird simultaneous posting Who? you and silver, probably a coincidence just looked like a planned entrance. should of quoted you too in it but you can read above and ppl plz answer the questions i have aksed too im probably not going to answer your questions but I also like to talk to people and then find who mafia is.
why do you not want to answer them? its a great way to talk to people
|
On January 06 2017 09:37 MichaelEhrmantraut wrote:Checking In.Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:25 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 09:06 Kmatt wrote:On January 06 2017 09:00 Onegu wrote:
VT claim Could you not lets act like ive never played mafia for a min: why? and i dont want to hear the "oh it narrows PR" crap (yes this is a vaild reason but anyone will argue this). Yes it is sub optimal in general but why are you opposed to it? also obligatory vote silverwolfnow onto something i want everyone to answer are you town? how long have you played mafia? do you play elsewhere and if so where? What is your typical play style? how do you scumhunt/townhunt? do you know anyone here that you can read very well? to answer my own: yes about 4-5 years now on and off now my typical style is to kinda talk to people and interact with others to try to get reads. most times it helps to have someone i know so i can quickly bounce with someone if they are town or lynch them if they are scum (hi silver) kinda said as above, but to summarize it i hunt though interactions most of the time yes, i can read silverwolf very well though watching and having interactions. 1. no 2. back in the day 3. no 4. ? 5. ? 6. nope obligatory qeustion : why the vote ?
its something i do regardless of alignment with silverwolf. its kinda my way of telling her when she reads up to say hi to me so i cna sort her.
|
On January 06 2017 09:43 Kmatt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:25 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 09:06 Kmatt wrote:On January 06 2017 09:00 Onegu wrote:
VT claim Could you not lets act like ive never played mafia for a min: why? Oh it's a pretty simple answer. You see Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:25 ika42 wrote:
and i dont want to hear the "oh it narrows PR" crap Okay fine I won't tell you.
lol. that made me chuckle
|
On January 06 2017 09:44 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:42 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 09:39 Grackaroni wrote:
I'll answer the questions.
1) I'm always town.
2) 5 years
3) no
4) spammy
5) We'll have to find out.
6) Probably Calix. What makes you say that re: #6? We've only been in one game before. We've definitely played more than one because in the last game we got in a shit fight. I usually watch the games that I'm not in and the one scum game I saw you play you didn't seem like you were able to match your town play.
when she played on sc2 her scum game was to be more agreebale on everything and more passive
|
On January 06 2017 09:48 SilverWolf77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 09:44 ika42 wrote:
its something i do regardless of alignment with silverwolf. its kinda my way of telling her when she reads up to say hi to me so i cna sort her. Hi ika!! I think we vote in a separate thread but not sure? I see one but I also saw where it said to vote in thread.Hopefully, someone will let us know. What kind of info do you think you will get with your questions regarding others alignment? Has it worked well for you in the past to start with these kind of questions?
i jsut checked rules and ya we have to its also fromated like this ##Vote kavdragon (just add bold)
i expect to see how people think and who they think they know. It works on getting a baseline of what and how people play.
|
On January 06 2017 10:41 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:39 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:24 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:19 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:16 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:13 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:11 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:10 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:07 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:02 Calix wrote:
[quote]
It was the first one that stuck out to me as awkward/ forced.
However I'm interested in your take on 'blendy' answers. well im not making a ground breaking finding but mafia generally try to blend in and make non commital or mimic posts right so they might have thought answering a list of questions which everyone else was doing is a good idea. probably not relevant here as the questionnaire was hardly insightful and i dont want to start a circle jerk with, well you posted 5th so you are scum. the whole exercise got me some good reads so not entirely pointless and now the the game is moving. Nothing is going to be ground-breaking at this point so that qualifier (from DF too in the post above) is 100% unnecessary. I didn't approach the questionnaires like that. The VCA-style "X voter/ poster is scum" thing is useless as a metric. What "good" reads do you have? yo just calm down alright My emotional state is irrelevant to the question. You claim to have reads, I'm asking for them. What's the point of saying "I have reads" and then be stubborn about sharing them? so what I did is I checked the order in which people responded to the questionnaire and the first ones to respond are clear town until we get to the people who were like 4th and onwards who are likely scum. 100% accurate I can't tell whether you're being serious or blowing me off here or both. If it's the former, I'd like to hear the rationale for that. nah not being serious, you just had no chill so it was fun to mess with you a bit. i thought your first post about michael was pretty good so your pretty towny to me. everyone else is suspect though. especially that kmatt dude If you think kmatt is suspect why did you vote Grack? cos silverwolf blew the whole thing wide open with his theory that maybe earlier posting was scum and not later posting. So I perfectly fused the two theories and my calculations said that 4th post was most likely mafia. You want a graph?
i would like to see the said graph
|
On January 06 2017 10:47 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:44 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 10:41 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:39 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:24 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:19 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:16 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:13 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:11 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:10 Calix wrote:
[quote]
Nothing is going to be ground-breaking at this point so that qualifier (from DF too in the post above) is 100% unnecessary.
I didn't approach the questionnaires like that. The VCA-style "X voter/ poster is scum" thing is useless as a metric.
What "good" reads do you have? yo just calm down alright My emotional state is irrelevant to the question. You claim to have reads, I'm asking for them. What's the point of saying "I have reads" and then be stubborn about sharing them? so what I did is I checked the order in which people responded to the questionnaire and the first ones to respond are clear town until we get to the people who were like 4th and onwards who are likely scum. 100% accurate I can't tell whether you're being serious or blowing me off here or both. If it's the former, I'd like to hear the rationale for that. nah not being serious, you just had no chill so it was fun to mess with you a bit. i thought your first post about michael was pretty good so your pretty towny to me. everyone else is suspect though. especially that kmatt dude If you think kmatt is suspect why did you vote Grack? cos silverwolf blew the whole thing wide open with his theory that maybe earlier posting was scum and not later posting. So I perfectly fused the two theories and my calculations said that 4th post was most likely mafia. You want a graph? i would like to see the said graph well i cant draw it because i lost all my pencils but trust me.
got paint on your computer then? it doesnt have to be neat nor do i care if its in pen but i want to see it now just so calix can be banging her head on the wall, just like when she could not use vowels
|
On January 06 2017 10:51 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:49 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 10:47 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:44 ika42 wrote:On January 06 2017 10:41 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:39 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:24 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:19 Calix wrote:On January 06 2017 10:16 KelsierSC wrote:On January 06 2017 10:13 Calix wrote:
[quote]
My emotional state is irrelevant to the question.
You claim to have reads, I'm asking for them. What's the point of saying "I have reads" and then be stubborn about sharing them? so what I did is I checked the order in which people responded to the questionnaire and the first ones to respond are clear town until we get to the people who were like 4th and onwards who are likely scum. 100% accurate I can't tell whether you're being serious or blowing me off here or both. If it's the former, I'd like to hear the rationale for that. nah not being serious, you just had no chill so it was fun to mess with you a bit. i thought your first post about michael was pretty good so your pretty towny to me. everyone else is suspect though. especially that kmatt dude If you think kmatt is suspect why did you vote Grack? cos silverwolf blew the whole thing wide open with his theory that maybe earlier posting was scum and not later posting. So I perfectly fused the two theories and my calculations said that 4th post was most likely mafia. You want a graph? i would like to see the said graph well i cant draw it because i lost all my pencils but trust me. got paint on your computer then? it doesnt have to be neat nor do i care if its in pen but i want to see it now just so calix can be banging her head on the wall, just like when she could not use vowels yeh but then i have to upload it to imgur or somethign and paste the link its too much hassle.
but, but graphs....
|
On January 06 2017 10:53 SilverWolf77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:49 KelsierSC wrote:
hey dont back out now or all my calculations will be wrong.
Don't forget to carry the one. Very important.
OMG.......
im cracking up right now....
also in about an hr ill be gone, i am doing remodel at work
|
On January 06 2017 10:59 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 10:57 SilverWolf77 wrote:On January 06 2017 10:55 KelsierSC wrote:
so how you reading ika atm? Slight townread based on posting the questions to get us talking and his activity and interest in the game so far. But he may be just copying his town meta so I'm keeping an eye on him still. yeh...like if i was you that is what I would be thinking if I was town. i have to go into work tomorrow unfortunately but only for like 1hr so should be on tomorrow. I know it seems like i've just been jerking off in the thread, and whilst this is true I think Calix, silver and ika are probably town and everyone else is kind of blegh. Grak is mafia though, im pretty happy with my vote at the moment.
This post gets my vote.
|
On January 06 2017 15:42 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 15:39 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 15:30 Vivax wrote:On January 06 2017 15:21 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 14:13 Vivax wrote:Is there anyone here who actually didn't play mafia before, or just very very little? On January 06 2017 11:31 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:43 Calix wrote:
I sense I'll have an aneurysm at this rate.
DF, you seem sensible. What else have you noticed so far? I actually feel weird about ika. Asked the kinda useless questionnaire and has basically been bs'ing a bit since. Not a real read but I find his opening a little off This read looks forced. I mean, you will say it isn't a read I know, but we both know it kind of is. And to me it just looks like you were looking for someone to make look guilty easily to fulfill Calix demand. Fend yourself, Foley. Forced how? Of course it's a read, but it's a D1 read 3 hours in. Forgive me if i'm not wow'd by someone asking nebulous or irrelevant questions about self meta that could easily be bullshitted. His play since is more trolly than I prefer, except regarding the point on Calix's scum play which is actually useful. Why not 1gu then? I've never seen Onegu play a non trolly game. It's within his meta either way, especially D1 lol But you have seen ikas meta yes?
how come you are acting like i am town?
|
On January 06 2017 15:50 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 11:31 darthfoley wrote:On January 06 2017 10:43 Calix wrote:
I sense I'll have an aneurysm at this rate.
DF, you seem sensible. What else have you noticed so far? I actually feel weird about ika. Asked the kinda useless questionnaire and has basically been bs'ing a bit since. Not a real read but I find his opening a little off I've seen people use Random Questioning Stage as a thing on other sites so I'm not sure why people treat that as AI.
I think its more of that "im new player so what i do must be AI"
i mean RQS is porb better then RVS for first time game here but *shrug*
|
On January 06 2017 15:53 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2017 11:48 B0stonSC wrote:
Hello! Sorry, hadn't realized this has started. Let me read through everything, and then I'll post thoughts This post pings me but I can't really figure out why. Like he posts this 2-4 hours-ish into the game and starts off by apologising for not being around here earlier which is pretty weird for town to do. I can't imagine myself saying sorry for something as a first post kind of deal so I don't get why he would is what I'm getting at.
for someone who uses logic, your using a gut read here.
it it more just a guess or more of a "well i would not do this" thing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
