EPTLiquidmania Qualifier #1
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:31 Kmatt wrote: I'm willing to bet that was sarcasm. SL any input here? I'd rather not have to speak on your behalf when we're in this thread together. "in this thread together" I wish I had a buddy in the thread with me | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:40 Kmatt wrote: That's a little too opportunistic/innocuous of an entry without contributing to a discussion. ##vote ExO_ speaking of opportunistic voting | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:47 Kmatt wrote: Your post was cherry-picking a reply as to not be inactive but still be out of sight for the last 12 hours. Mine is acknowledging low-hanging fruit. And you still aren't questioning/analyzing/posting reads so Cherry-picking? Are you fucking kidding me? I just woke up, haven't even rolled out of bed yet. Saying something about a buddy in a game with this few players is a bit interesting don't you think? I'd think no town player is so ready to befriend anybody else as you are with that post. Accusing me of posting to not appear inactive is completely ridiculous. I just got into the thread, just realized the game started. | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 01:43 Kmatt wrote: Okay looking back I misread you the first time, thought you meant I was buddying with LightningStrike by conversing. Still not really buddying with Sicklucker, it was LS who was having a hard time understanding the comment so there's no harm in explaining it to him. My bit about "being in this thread together" refers to the fact that SL could very easily answer these questions himself. And Disinfo not immediately agreeing with me doesn't make him scum. Being this invested in your own innocence and pointing fingers at us for having the audacity to doubt you is scummy. If you were really town you'd be proving it by lynching scum, not throwing shade because we're scumhunting. Disinfo didn't immediately agree with you, he disregarded your case by saying im not a morning person. Are you reading the same thread as I am? | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 01:47 Koshi wrote: When there is content to discuss, sitting on your hands and lynching inactives is bad. Is that what I am doing Exo? What am I doing Exo? Can you tell me what I am doing? You and evidently kmatt think that the first post I make into the thread, because it's literally one of the first things I noticed when I realized the game started is making a huge case. I posted one sentence, and suddenly thats a case against kmatt? If you want to talk about overreaction, that's a huge overreaction. He immediately omgus me. I was literally still in bed and it tilted me a bit. And you hop on in support of him right away, and then suggestion we should vote off an inactive. You won't commit to voting me, but I don't see you discussing anything else right now | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 01:49 Koshi wrote: Feels like you are playing a game against this thread Exo. Kmatt buddying Disinfo defending Koshi also mafia? It's weird I don't think disinfo is scum, I'm saying you guys not finding him suspicious if you think I'm scum, is suspicious. | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 01:56 Koshi wrote: I am fully committing voting you. Just cba to do it on phone. I can only do so much. You are top priority atm. Pls answer my questions truthfully. You are on thin ice. I couldn't care in the slightest about being on thin ice with you. You're a loose cannon. But how can I answer questions if you haven't even asked any? | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
I don't have a fucking reason to think he's scum yet. Especially when kmatt is over here omgusing me at the first thing I say and you are defending him like crazy. Do I already need to have a 5 page analysis on why I think every player is town? I'm not going to operate from the assumption that everyone is scum, that's fucking retarded. I'll scum read someone when I have a reason to think they are scum | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:02 Koshi wrote: [/b][/b]You are focussing on the wrong part of that sentence. I'm saying you guys not finding him suspicious if you think I'm scum, is suspicious. Why? Goddamn each refresh is a new red alert from my virusthingie. If you think I'm a scum: Kmatt comes into the thread and votes me. Disinfo basically brushes off the case saying I'm not a morning person and tries to redirect the conversation elsewhere. If you think I'm scum, why are you both ignoring disinfo doing this? Either you (and kmatt) don't really think I'm scum, or are ignoring disinfo here for some reason I cannot fathom. your turn Why aren't you scum reading him if you think I'm scum? | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:07 Holyflare wrote: Like the kmart guy could be mafia and exo doesn't even factor that in. Just full on tilt mode for no reason. .....what. That's literally the first thing I implied, and have continued with. just wat | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:11 Holyflare wrote: Then why the fuck are you angry at mafia calling you mafia? What possible reason is there for you to be tilted that he's playing his alignment? What I'm saying is and what you've now confirmed is you're getting tilted by someone doing a shit play when it's their literal job to do that. It doesn't make sense at all. What if they aren't mafia? I don't like being called mafia at all. Especially for bullshit reasons. Literally look at the end of the most recent game I played. If you think this is getting "tilted" then I get tilted easily I guess. I don't understand why I'm not allowed to be tilted, especially when I say one sentence and am immediately voted and teamed by 2 people. Either way it's far too early in the thread for me to lock into both of them being mafia. So I can't just brush them off entirely. THAT would be a scummy thing to do. | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:14 Holyflare wrote: I also had to check because while I am lazy I don't normally forget these things. No, you didn't call him mafia at all. You just call koshi and kmart suspicious for not finding a guy you don't even find suspicious, suspicious. That's straight up bull crap man. What is this even in reference to? The first thing I did was imply that kmatt attempting to buddy somebody was scummy. UNLESS I TALK IN ALL CAPS AND WRITE VOTE ##WHOEVER DO YOU NOT THINK I'M CALLING SOMEBODY MAFIA? Do I have to use small words and spell everything out? | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:21 Holyflare wrote: So you think he's mafia for a bull shit vote You get tilted regardless You think disformation isn't suspicious You push koshi and kmatt as suspicious for not finding disfo suspicious You say that you are implying they are mafia You say they might not be mafia and you might be wrong Is that a fair summary? Can you explain why they should be suspicious of disformation? I'm about 100% sure koshi voted you for being angry at kmatt playing the game instead of some circular deflection logic. Why does that make them suspicious instead of disformation ACTUALLY being suspicious? Like in a world where you're town you're saying 2 mafia/towns should find someone deflecting off a town you suspicious so why aren't you calling disformation suspicious at all?? I don't agree with your assessment of why Koshi "voted" me. Let Koshi speak for Koshi. I wasn't angry at Kmatt for playing the game, I was angry at being immediately OMGUSed, and I don't think it makes any sense for Koshi to vote me based on that. They should be suspicious of disinformation because he brushed off anything kmatt was trying to say about me being scum and tried to move the conversation elsewhere. If I'm scum, and disinfo is immediately trying to move the conversation elsewhere, it should be suspicious. What I'm implying is by not even saying anything about disinfo they are acting suspiciously, and looks scum-indicative to me. I know I'm town. So in order for me to find disinfo suspicious I have to think that he's ignoring what kmatt said about me not because he thinks its bad (which is the obvious conclusion in my mind) but becuase he's mafia just wanting to skirt by. That's not impossible I guess, but I don't think its nearly enough to scum read him for. | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:24 Holyflare wrote: I cannot for the life of me fathom how someone can say people are suspicious for not pushing a non-suspicious person. Why is disinfo not-suspicious? My logic is this: Koshi/Kmatt think I'm scum Disinfo immediately tries to deflect the thread away from kmatt's scum reading of me Therefore if Koshi/Kmatt are really town, who really think I'm scum, they should at least be questioning disinfo | ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:29 Kmatt wrote: Can't really quote because mobile but here goes. As someone said earlier, my initial jab at Exo was more testing the water than anything. His overreaction is the basis of my current read. Disinformation didn't rebuke my case in any meaningful way. He just interpreted your post differently, and there was nothing odd or unreasonable about it. If he claimed that my current read is baseless, started pointing fingers without a case or spouted expletives I would have reason to suspect him. At the moment I don't. It looks like Exo is digging this hole deeper with every refresh so I would need a substantial new case to take my vote off of him. Yeah this is clearly how I would enter the thread and play the game as scum /sarcasm | ||
| ||
