|
On October 06 2016 20:51 Holyflare wrote: Actually no I'm gonna call bs.
Star wars is the game where none of us were ever getting lynched. I don't remember palmar ever being at 7 votes. I thought star wars was the game were mafia got stomped?
|
On October 06 2016 20:53 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 20:47 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 20:46 Koshi wrote:On October 06 2016 20:34 Holyflare wrote: Why would mafia palmar not vote to save himself? This is a really bad argument and you need to stop pushing it in the thread. He did the axect same thing in Star Wars mafia. I was mafia with him and the votes were 7-7 and he didn't vote to save himself. I think he eventually voted 1 minute after the deadline but got saved because the other guy reached 7 first. Like... He did this as mafia before. You could have saved me a lot of typing by posting this earlier Weren't you all in the game though? JAT for sure. I think you as well. For sure. Pretty long ago by now, but yeah. Wasn't part of the game for long though.
You and HF are probably talking about different star wars game. You about awaken he about rogue 1. Right?
|
Yes, it was only because I switched literally in the last second.
|
On October 06 2016 20:58 Holyflare wrote: I'll just shoot calix and we can get palmar, whatever. If there is a vig and he doesn't shoot fucking stutters I'm going to be mad.
|
On October 06 2016 21:00 Holyflare wrote: Why kill stutters when we can clear up wagons and motives and stutters is already mod warned? Which wagon are you going to clear up by shooting calix exactly? And betting on stutters actually getting modkilled is quite risky. He just needs to make a few posts and we will have to waste an entire phase by lynching him.
|
On October 06 2016 21:20 Superbia wrote:Stutters is a pretty shit shot. If you want to policy shoot, shoot Palmar (for info). If you want to hit mafia probably shoot Damdred. + Show Spoiler +Like there even is a vigi Palmar is a pretty shit shot. You always lynch palmar and similar people who are good at defending themselves as town.
Stutters is by far the best shot because he will never be readable and the day we finally get rid of him will be a complete waste with 0 information gained.
|
When has banking on a modkill ever worked? People always say this but it never fucking works. Sure, if the vig is not in any danger to be nightkilled he can theoretically wait until night2 but I think that's not optimal play.
|
On October 06 2016 21:34 Holyflare wrote: Killing a potential town guy is extremely sub optimal too, more so in fact. He might even get replaced... Everyone is potential town. And shooting someone who can be figured out by trying to lynch him is way worse than shooting deadweight. It is really irritating that I have to argue about basics like this with you.
|
On October 06 2016 21:42 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 18:39 Holyflare wrote: Marv is incredibly apathetic/probably mafia. Marv could be replaced with HF and the sentence would still make sense. Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 18:00 justanothertownie wrote:On October 06 2016 16:12 Superbia wrote: Hmm did JAT have an opinion on Palmar or Bats? On October 06 2016 16:12 Superbia wrote: Only vote outside the wagons outside of Bats and stutters (who will hopefully get MKed). Why do you ask this when noone besides you is around and it would take like 2 minutes to check if you were actually interested in the answer? So, I voted outside of the 2 wagons. Do you think that is scummy? That was much of an overreaction to Super's inquiries. Defensive for no reason. Do you prefer Justanothermafia or Justanotherscum?
On October 06 2016 21:45 NeverUnlucky wrote:If you could send your mafioso to shank her, it would be appreciated. It would let me time to catch up to her post count and would get us townies rid of the town tard. Stones. Glass houses. Etc.
If someone throws out a lazy nonsensical read like superbia did I am not supposed to question that in your opinion? The argument is complete and utter bullshit since the wagons did not exist when I left. Still he thinks it is scummy for my vote to be off wagon. Calling that out isn't defensive in the slightest. If you don't care about what superbia does at all like it seems you need to have a gigantic townread on him for some reason. And I have 0 idea how anyone could have that at this point.
On October 06 2016 22:15 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:10 Holyflare wrote:That's a shame then. Guess I'll just abuse mechanics myself next time, thanks for the tip Calix is not townie, especially not after palmar defence. If that is why you think I'm being town-read then you are very very very very bad. I will need to read the setup to see if town retard is a unique role. If it is then you are undoubtedly mafia. It was not a defense. I think she's an obvious town, but I am not opposed to her lynched because the idea looks entertaining. It most definitely is the only reason you are townread. If you keep playing like this it is probably time to check your meta soon to see if you really aren't able to be this active as mafia.
|
What kind of question is that? If that was the case mafia probably did not really care who of them got lynched so we think about the wagons with that in mind.
|
On October 06 2016 22:48 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:45 justanothertownie wrote: What kind of question is that? If that was the case mafia probably did not really care who of them got lynched so we think about the wagons with that in mind. And you would question people who are outside of the wagons first because they apparently did not care about the lynches. Why are you getting so defensive? Like you're a natural stand out if Palmar is town. Do you think Palmar is town? Seriously? Are you not able to read?
1. I have no idea what Palmar is. Could easily be mafia. That's why we need to wagon him day2.
2. I will explain the outlier thing to you like you are 5 because apparently it is really hard to grasp this simple thing:
JAT in thread. No wagons. JAT votes superbia who he thinks is mafia and who other people agreed would be a decent lynch/realistic wagon. JAT is gone until after deadline which he announced before the game started. Wagons start to form on batsnacks and Palmar. . . . . JAT is scummy because he did not predict the wagons would be bats and Palmar?!?!
Do you see the logical problem here now?
|
On October 06 2016 22:58 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:53 justanothertownie wrote:On October 06 2016 22:48 Superbia wrote:On October 06 2016 22:45 justanothertownie wrote: What kind of question is that? If that was the case mafia probably did not really care who of them got lynched so we think about the wagons with that in mind. And you would question people who are outside of the wagons first because they apparently did not care about the lynches. Why are you getting so defensive? Like you're a natural stand out if Palmar is town. Do you think Palmar is town? Seriously? Are you not able to read? 1. I have no idea what Palmar is. Could easily be mafia. That's why we need to wagon him day2. 2. I will explain the outlier thing to you like you are 5 because apparently it is really hard to grasp this simple thing: JAT in thread. No wagons. JAT votes superbia who he thinks is mafia and who other people agreed would be a decent lynch/realistic wagon. JAT is gone until after deadline which he announced before the game started. Wagons start to form on batsnacks and Palmar. . . . . JAT is scummy because he did not predict the wagons would be bats and Palmar?!?! Do you see the logical problem here now? I really really don't know why you are being this defensive dude. Who cares? This is not about me but about you making some superficial bs read. And now you try to hide behind "you are being defensive hurr durr" instead of addressing the actual problem. You ask questions but do not really care about the subject. You are posting just to post.
|
On October 07 2016 00:17 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 00:11 justanothertownie wrote:On October 06 2016 22:58 Superbia wrote:On October 06 2016 22:53 justanothertownie wrote:On October 06 2016 22:48 Superbia wrote:On October 06 2016 22:45 justanothertownie wrote: What kind of question is that? If that was the case mafia probably did not really care who of them got lynched so we think about the wagons with that in mind. And you would question people who are outside of the wagons first because they apparently did not care about the lynches. Why are you getting so defensive? Like you're a natural stand out if Palmar is town. Do you think Palmar is town? Seriously? Are you not able to read? 1. I have no idea what Palmar is. Could easily be mafia. That's why we need to wagon him day2. 2. I will explain the outlier thing to you like you are 5 because apparently it is really hard to grasp this simple thing: JAT in thread. No wagons. JAT votes superbia who he thinks is mafia and who other people agreed would be a decent lynch/realistic wagon. JAT is gone until after deadline which he announced before the game started. Wagons start to form on batsnacks and Palmar. . . . . JAT is scummy because he did not predict the wagons would be bats and Palmar?!?! Do you see the logical problem here now? I really really don't know why you are being this defensive dude. Who cares? This is not about me but about you making some superficial bs read. And now you try to hide behind "you are being defensive hurr durr" instead of addressing the actual problem. You ask questions but do not really care about the subject. You are posting just to post. Thanks for letting me know why I do stuff. I had no idea. ;p You are welcome. If there are more things I need to explain about you just ask.
|
On October 07 2016 00:18 Superbia wrote: Though if you keep following the Ritoky "everything you do is mafia because you're mafia" route I'm going to lynch you. Remember the last time you threatened to lynch me? How did that work out for you?
|
Another thing you did as mafia. Unwarranted overconfidence.
|
On October 07 2016 00:22 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 00:19 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 00:18 Superbia wrote: Though if you keep following the Ritoky "everything you do is mafia because you're mafia" route I'm going to lynch you. Remember the last time you threatened to lynch me? How did that work out for you? Scary! Indeed.
|
On October 07 2016 00:25 Superbia wrote: Now my confidence is a mafia tell? Dayum. Yep. Not that this is actually new since among other things this is how I caught you last game.
|
On October 07 2016 00:33 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:39 justanothertownie wrote:On October 06 2016 22:15 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 06 2016 22:10 Holyflare wrote:That's a shame then. Guess I'll just abuse mechanics myself next time, thanks for the tip Calix is not townie, especially not after palmar defence. If that is why you think I'm being town-read then you are very very very very bad. I will need to read the setup to see if town retard is a unique role. If it is then you are undoubtedly mafia. It was not a defense. I think she's an obvious town, but I am not opposed to her lynched because the idea looks entertaining. It most definitely is the only reason you are townread. If you keep playing like this it is probably time to check your meta soon to see if you really aren't able to be this active as mafia. Oh yeah? Funny how none of it was present in your town-read of me, hmm? In fact, you had another argument to town-read me. Nice contradiction. Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 02:35 justanothertownie wrote: nu: Not gonna lie - his play since the very active start has been less than subpar. But he has that gamey shit going for him which almost always comes from town.
These I wouldn't lynch without a good case (which has to come between now and like 30 minutes later because I will be gone):
I suggest you read that quote again since it actually proves my point and not yours.
|
On October 07 2016 00:35 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:53 justanothertownie wrote:On October 06 2016 22:48 Superbia wrote:On October 06 2016 22:45 justanothertownie wrote: What kind of question is that? If that was the case mafia probably did not really care who of them got lynched so we think about the wagons with that in mind. And you would question people who are outside of the wagons first because they apparently did not care about the lynches. Why are you getting so defensive? Like you're a natural stand out if Palmar is town. Do you think Palmar is town? Seriously? Are you not able to read? 1. I have no idea what Palmar is. Could easily be mafia. That's why we need to wagon him day2. 2. I will explain the outlier thing to you like you are 5 because apparently it is really hard to grasp this simple thing: JAT in thread. No wagons. JAT votes superbia who he thinks is mafia and who other people agreed would be a decent lynch/realistic wagon. JAT is gone until after deadline which he announced before the game started. Wagons start to form on batsnacks and Palmar. . . . . JAT is scummy because he did not predict the wagons would be bats and Palmar?!?! Do you see the logical problem here now? This post is so bad and so scummy. Prepare the guillotine, boys. Feel free to explain.
|
On October 07 2016 00:37 Superbia wrote: Jat what is my town meta? Being unremarkable and far less combative about bullshit. + some decent observations from time to time
|
|
|
|