[M][N] Murder on the Cruise Trip Mafia - Page 25

On October 10 2016 06:19 NeverUnlucky wrote:


Why do you assume it's a roleblocker?

On October 10 2016 07:33 Damdred wrote:
Saying that my activity level is indicative of anything is folly at best and idiocy at worst.

For example I,have several scum games that have 15-30 pages who or at the same time I have some scum games with 1-5 pages. And these happen in indiscriminate means as I see fit.

The same can be said of my town game the range in which I post is high sometimes and low others.

Trying to draw conclusions based off activity and any type of excuses (that I'm attempting to keep out of thread) is ludicrous.

As such if you are town you should be happy I am here and will catch up. If you are scum keep being dumb.

On October 10 2016 07:42 NeverUnlucky wrote:
There’s only one moment I noticed his tone being different, and it was in his interaction with bats. It was more inquisitive than his usual chummy-chummy tone. Overall he feels more distant this game. Was that what you had noticed?
Don’t think he was sick at the time and don’t think being sick makes the tone more inquisitive than usual.

I’ve noted this too. It’s a not the best argument as he may be trying a new play style or approaching the game differently (before he got his rolecard).
For instance, my play this game is nothing like any of the other games I’ve played before.

You are right that you are a hypocrite though. I can tell you that much c:

On October 10 2016 07:56 Damdred wrote:


This post basically condemns me for activity without overtly stateing it.

And your reads on me for the both of you are horribly bad as per usual. And might I add saying he's never inquisitive or the like is foolish as neither of you know anything of me past one game.

Even the fame bats quoted I was inquisitive.

On October 10 2016 09:06 Damdred wrote:
That's a bad case tbh,

The first part is about me being wrong? The game of mafia is about people coming from a place of no knowledge to try to find the people with all of the information and are trying to stay hidden.

Ie most of the time when you role town especially early game (which is where that wad) you will be wrong most of the time sometimes you will be dialed in and be more right than wrong,but most of the time not so much.

Bats at the time of the read_(he even admits as much) that he hadn't taken stances or done much of note. And he did have one post of tinfoil when normally he would have,much more. I can't remember the exact post but was a scenario where someone was scum,and with who etc.

Overall another post about being wrong in my read, which doesn't make me,scum.

A few people agreed with me,that the way super went about interacting with marv will get the negative affects of marv raging and even marv says that is nit the way to go about interacting with him.

This isn't really a point against me really you are losing the context of the situation and painting it scummy.

As for hesitant reads I am allowed those from time to time when I am unsure which way to go. I don't really think it's a point against me as everyone is unsure at points.

Overall your case is a narrative that lacks context and attempts to paint,me as scum,while,ignoring other moving,parts in,the thread.

Its a bad case but I still do not think you are scum just dumb.

On October 10 2016 22:17 Damdred wrote:
Basically if I say it both of you think it's a bad post, even if it is the truth.

If someone else says something against me,it's a good post. Never case against me is bad I explained why.

And I'd rather argue and take part,in the thread while I catch up than read 100 pages and disappear for most of the day.

Also to point out something that calix says, he's trying to use against me (about the marv point) and well it's super important the context of the thread and how marv actually reacted. It matters a lot actually what others/marv himself states after I make my point.