|
|
|
On October 04 2016 20:49 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 20:44 justanothertownie wrote:On October 04 2016 20:42 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 20:38 Superbia wrote:
General complaint:
I agree that this PM shit is really really fucking dumb.
The fact that people are already drawing conclusions based on someone who claims he can be mod confirmed is also really fucking dumb. Like conjecture regarding PMs is already happening.
This why you never bring this shit up. You're either soft claiming a role or you're really talking about again-the-rules shit like an absolute dumb ass. Either way it's fucking dumb because people are now talking about PMs and inferring based on it.
I wanted a nice, high-level game. Not PM garbage.
Thx4listening. yes, unfortunately i did read this completely unnecessary pointless post. It's content is pointless. The hostile/aggressive attitude on the other hand is somewhat interesting.  I know how you read me JAT; So I kinda like this post.
How reassuring.
|
On October 04 2016 20:54 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 20:51 justanothertownie wrote:On October 04 2016 20:49 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 20:44 justanothertownie wrote:On October 04 2016 20:42 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 20:38 Superbia wrote:
General complaint:
I agree that this PM shit is really really fucking dumb.
The fact that people are already drawing conclusions based on someone who claims he can be mod confirmed is also really fucking dumb. Like conjecture regarding PMs is already happening.
This why you never bring this shit up. You're either soft claiming a role or you're really talking about again-the-rules shit like an absolute dumb ass. Either way it's fucking dumb because people are now talking about PMs and inferring based on it.
I wanted a nice, high-level game. Not PM garbage.
Thx4listening. yes, unfortunately i did read this completely unnecessary pointless post. It's content is pointless. The hostile/aggressive attitude on the other hand is somewhat interesting. I know how you read me JAT; So I kinda like this post. How reassuring. I give you my 100% truthful double promise word that I am town. You can now continue looking at other people while I go back to lurking.
You aren't very good at that whole lurking thing tbh. LAL
|
On October 04 2016 21:05 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 19:35 Holyflare wrote:
Point out to me where he does this on your site and tries to abuse role pms to get mod confirmed and I'll believe you.
Otherwise you are madia. I absolutely have no idea where she got that from. I never did anything of the sort. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 19:38 Calix wrote:
It literally says "no posting PMs from the host" - it's clear that it's against the rules. (it's also a common rule on the home site, it's not like he got mixed up there)
Being skeptical of something that he obviously cannot follow through with does not make me mafia. No, it's not clear. Am I allowed to paraphrase what I received via PM? That is what is not clear. It's clear on our homesite. Rules state that we cannot quote PMs but may paraphrase them.
Now I am seriously confused. How would paraphrasing help you in any way? Oo
|
On second thought - forget I asked. Let's not keep discussing this.
|
On October 04 2016 21:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. For the sake of argument, why would he try force a read on the one person who can most easily rebut him ? She can claim that she knows my play and get others to lynch me. Doesn't matter if I can rebut her, as long as the others trust her voice over mine. I don't really understand why you ask this question. Power Wolfs do this all the time. There isn't really a 'why'.
And then once your are supposedly mislynched she looks like utter shit?!
On October 04 2016 21:34 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:33 Oatsmaster wrote:
NU, is calix mafia?
##vote superbia
Calix the fake activity is refering to you being mafia and just pushing shit for the sake of creating posts.
Nu, can you explain why stutters is mafia? So you think I am scummy but you vote for Superbia? You're going to have to walk me through that one. (also NU said he agreed with me about Stutters)
Since you just agreed with me he also did. Just sayin.
On October 04 2016 22:11 Superbia wrote:
I am stuck between Oats or JAT. While I liked JATs early reason on me I feel the town JAT would've chased that shit down instead of backing off and saying "lal".
What is there to chase? It's pretty much everything I got on you since you refuse to really take part in the game. But the fact that you again try to paint my towngame as totally "anal" again like you did the last time you were mafia really doesn't speak in your favor.
|
On October 04 2016 23:32 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 23:30 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 23:28 marvellosity wrote:
like my question was 100% legit, if i start making shit up about someone i know well on here, i'm gonna get called out on it and it's a lot more trouble than its worth
hence my question to you asking why he would call you out on something that isn't true / he can't prove
that's why i ask the question This I don't understand either. I don't know what's the question you're referring to. i can't be bothered to explain if you can't just read the few posts preceding this where i quoted you directly saying "i don't get why you asked the question" anyway ##Vote: PalmarHighest % mafia right now
Hm. Interesting. What I am seeing so far is standard useless palmar. Which can basically mean anything.
|
On October 04 2016 23:00 Calix wrote:
I don't know if Oats is mafia. There was one post he made a while back which I felt was kind-of town.
Other than that, I don't understand him whatsoever.
That's normal. Oats is being oats.
On October 04 2016 23:11 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:59 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope. Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched. That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant. And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate. On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:
[quote]
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING.
You stated "Calix is scummy"
You voted for Superbia.
You did not state a scum-read on Superbia.
Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote?
If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end. Spit it out or piss off. I said my point already. Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him. Calling a vote a pressure vote kills its intent. Do you have actual reads? Intent over already. I think koshi has been skating by on pithy little comments. I seem to remember other people promising shit but not delivering. I think it's stutters so he's leaning scum. Pretty sure Marv and Palmar are town. They don't give enough of a shit.
You should really know better than to townread Palmar and especially marv for "not giving a shit". Like wtf.
|
On October 04 2016 23:41 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 23:37 justanothertownie wrote:On October 04 2016 23:32 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 23:30 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 23:28 marvellosity wrote:
like my question was 100% legit, if i start making shit up about someone i know well on here, i'm gonna get called out on it and it's a lot more trouble than its worth
hence my question to you asking why he would call you out on something that isn't true / he can't prove
that's why i ask the question This I don't understand either. I don't know what's the question you're referring to. i can't be bothered to explain if you can't just read the few posts preceding this where i quoted you directly saying "i don't get why you asked the question" anyway ##Vote: PalmarHighest % mafia right now Hm. Interesting. What I am seeing so far is standard useless palmar. Which can basically mean anything. He's rolled mafia a lot lately He signed up minutes after me, after I haven't played in 4 months, makes a comment about enjoying playing with me Decides not to engage Don't like it. Think he'd want to at least play with me. Think lurking is a good way for him to hide because people say things like you just did. Obviously this is all just conjecture / my feelings but I like it
Well, you know him better but I am not sure I would expect town Palmar to be all active and shit just because of that. But I don't mind pressure on him. Pressure on Palmar during the week is always a good thing.
|
On October 04 2016 23:45 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 23:43 justanothertownie wrote:On October 04 2016 23:41 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 23:37 justanothertownie wrote:On October 04 2016 23:32 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 23:30 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 23:28 marvellosity wrote:
like my question was 100% legit, if i start making shit up about someone i know well on here, i'm gonna get called out on it and it's a lot more trouble than its worth
hence my question to you asking why he would call you out on something that isn't true / he can't prove
that's why i ask the question This I don't understand either. I don't know what's the question you're referring to. i can't be bothered to explain if you can't just read the few posts preceding this where i quoted you directly saying "i don't get why you asked the question" anyway ##Vote: PalmarHighest % mafia right now Hm. Interesting. What I am seeing so far is standard useless palmar. Which can basically mean anything. He's rolled mafia a lot lately He signed up minutes after me, after I haven't played in 4 months, makes a comment about enjoying playing with me Decides not to engage Don't like it. Think he'd want to at least play with me. Think lurking is a good way for him to hide because people say things like you just did. Obviously this is all just conjecture / my feelings but I like it Well, you know him better but I am not sure I would expect town Palmar to be all active and shit just because of that. But I don't mind pressure on him. Pressure on Palmar during the week is always a good thing. I'll let you know near eod if I really really want to lynch him, at which point you should listen. For now, just staking mah space
The thing is that I won't be around eod. So there is that. But I am sure you won't need me for that if it comes down to it.
|
On October 05 2016 00:29 Koshi wrote:
Am I not underwhelming?
Yes, yes you are. Don't worry.
|
On October 05 2016 00:41 Calix wrote:
Also if anyone wants to comment on batsnacks' filter so far then knock yourself out.
0 problems with his filter so far. Generally town batsnacks doesn't give a fuck/is very sassy/self-confident while scum batsnacks tends to blend in immediately.
Not really conclusive since I think he was improving his game the last time I saw him as mafia but I wouldn't lynch him right now.
|
On October 05 2016 01:11 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 00:47 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 00:41 Calix wrote:
Also if anyone wants to comment on batsnacks' filter so far then knock yourself out. 0 problems with his filter so far. Generally town batsnacks doesn't give a fuck/is very sassy/self-confident while scum batsnacks tends to blend in immediately. Not really conclusive since I think he was improving his game the last time I saw him as mafia but I wouldn't lynch him right now. Eh? I didn't get the impression that he was being that sassy or whatnot. In fact, his filter is one that I'd characterise as "trying to blend in" so I don't relate to your impression of him. I don't have a 'case' per se but my impression of him is that he's popping in to make comments which sound okay by themselves but add up to a poor filter. Namely he has a few pre-flip association theories which don't tell us much about where he actually stands on the players as individuals. #266 pinged me because he doesn't really SAY anything in it. He waffles around, seemingly contemplating the possibility of scum!Calix, and then concludes null on NU/ myself (although he says that NU 'gives him town vibes'?) and his argument is "if they're TvT then it would be more obvious since they seem to know each other well" #334 and #399 read like he's throwing shade on everyone in the NU/ Calix/ HF debacle. He throws up ideas where we could all be scum at certain points...but we have NO idea of where he actually stands. This is lazy but I think he's a good candidate for scum atm. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 00:55 batsnacks wrote:On October 05 2016 00:32 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 05 2016 00:26 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 00:14 batsnacks wrote:
Calix said that there was no specific evidence she could produce for NU abusing PMs as Mafia, even though she implied NU did this as Mafia before
Holyflare said "produce evidence or die"
Those events happened in that order. Maybe Mafia Holyflare knowingly issued Calix an impossible task to make the narrative for Calix being Mafia stronger? Anyway that's what I was thinking hopefully it makes sense. Quote the posts please. I explicitly said that I had no specific evidence after HF's last post iirc. On another note, Palmar is underwhelming as fuck so far. Wouldn't mind policy-lynching him. No, this post was not against you. It was against HF. Read snacks's post again. It's about HF being aware that what he is asking you is impossible for you to deliver, thus making you appear mafia. offski Yeah this is also effective if holyflare is town though so I guess it depends whether or not town Holyflare thinks Calix is Mafia. Holyflare wasn't wrong about anything he said it just seemed like a pretty dramatic way to be right. Calix wrote it off st the time as Holyflare being a dramatic person, I would probably be more concerned about it in her position. HF is a dramatic person though? You're not actually faulting HF's arguments, you're just faulting his confidence which he can do as any alignment. (aka it's null) No idea why you're hung up on this. Also how is your point 'effective' if your original point had HF as scum? I don't understand.
Actually there is less of that stuff in his filter than I remembered. But there are still quite a few posts I would label as typical town bats posts. Maybe I didn't use the correct words to describe the tone:
On October 04 2016 07:24 batsnacks wrote:
Just a scummy pop in post nothing to see here.
On October 04 2016 21:45 batsnacks wrote:
lol someone said "Power Wolf" that sounds like a sex thing
On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote:
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS
People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat
They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right?
|
I still maintain that I do not have a particular problem with his filter but I retract my confidence.
|
On October 05 2016 01:19 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:16 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:11 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 00:47 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 00:41 Calix wrote:
Also if anyone wants to comment on batsnacks' filter so far then knock yourself out. 0 problems with his filter so far. Generally town batsnacks doesn't give a fuck/is very sassy/self-confident while scum batsnacks tends to blend in immediately. Not really conclusive since I think he was improving his game the last time I saw him as mafia but I wouldn't lynch him right now. Eh? I didn't get the impression that he was being that sassy or whatnot. In fact, his filter is one that I'd characterise as "trying to blend in" so I don't relate to your impression of him. I don't have a 'case' per se but my impression of him is that he's popping in to make comments which sound okay by themselves but add up to a poor filter. Namely he has a few pre-flip association theories which don't tell us much about where he actually stands on the players as individuals. #266 pinged me because he doesn't really SAY anything in it. He waffles around, seemingly contemplating the possibility of scum!Calix, and then concludes null on NU/ myself (although he says that NU 'gives him town vibes'?) and his argument is "if they're TvT then it would be more obvious since they seem to know each other well" #334 and #399 read like he's throwing shade on everyone in the NU/ Calix/ HF debacle. He throws up ideas where we could all be scum at certain points...but we have NO idea of where he actually stands. This is lazy but I think he's a good candidate for scum atm. On October 05 2016 00:55 batsnacks wrote:On October 05 2016 00:32 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 05 2016 00:26 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 00:14 batsnacks wrote:
Calix said that there was no specific evidence she could produce for NU abusing PMs as Mafia, even though she implied NU did this as Mafia before
Holyflare said "produce evidence or die"
Those events happened in that order. Maybe Mafia Holyflare knowingly issued Calix an impossible task to make the narrative for Calix being Mafia stronger? Anyway that's what I was thinking hopefully it makes sense. Quote the posts please. I explicitly said that I had no specific evidence after HF's last post iirc. On another note, Palmar is underwhelming as fuck so far. Wouldn't mind policy-lynching him. No, this post was not against you. It was against HF. Read snacks's post again. It's about HF being aware that what he is asking you is impossible for you to deliver, thus making you appear mafia. offski Yeah this is also effective if holyflare is town though so I guess it depends whether or not town Holyflare thinks Calix is Mafia. Holyflare wasn't wrong about anything he said it just seemed like a pretty dramatic way to be right. Calix wrote it off st the time as Holyflare being a dramatic person, I would probably be more concerned about it in her position. HF is a dramatic person though? You're not actually faulting HF's arguments, you're just faulting his confidence which he can do as any alignment. (aka it's null) No idea why you're hung up on this. Also how is your point 'effective' if your original point had HF as scum? I don't understand. Actually there is less of that stuff in his filter than I remembered. But there are still quite a few posts I would label as typical town bats posts. Maybe I didn't use the correct words to describe the tone: On October 04 2016 07:24 batsnacks wrote:
Just a scummy pop in post nothing to see here. On October 04 2016 21:45 batsnacks wrote:
lol someone said "Power Wolf" that sounds like a sex thing On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote:
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS
People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat
They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right? First two look like typical shit-posts to me. Third one is one of the reasons why I'm suspecting him. So not terribly convinced here but I'll see.
The quality of the content doesn't necessarily correlate with the overall usefullness of a post to get a read. Those ARE shitposts. But in my experience town batsnacks is more likely to make shitposts like that. If you want to judge him on content you will have a bad time if he is town.
|
On October 05 2016 01:23 Calix wrote:
I'm not bothered about his shit-posts; they don't factor into the main issues I have with him.
I just don't think they warrant a town-read unless you're saying that he's one of those types who is more serious as scum.
He is definitely one of thise types.
|
On October 05 2016 01:33 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:30 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 01:28 Palmar wrote:
Yo who wants to spend 20 minutes talking intimately? Yo who wants to spend 20 minutes listening to how I'm like, Numbah Wun? I'll bite. I was mafia that game, I'm actually a really nice guy, except when I'm an asshole. But most of the time that I'm not an asshole I am nice. What do you think of Holyflare? Particularly this reply to you voting NU: Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. The bad is leaving himself an out, but he's essentially saying it's scummy that you voted him.
Terribly sorry to interrupt your most intimate conversation but what is YOUR opinion on HF? Feel free to answer after calix does if necessary.
|
On October 05 2016 01:40 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:40 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:33 Palmar wrote:On October 05 2016 01:30 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 01:28 Palmar wrote:
Yo who wants to spend 20 minutes talking intimately? Yo who wants to spend 20 minutes listening to how I'm like, Numbah Wun? I'll bite. I was mafia that game, I'm actually a really nice guy, except when I'm an asshole. But most of the time that I'm not an asshole I am nice. What do you think of Holyflare? Particularly this reply to you voting NU: On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. The bad is leaving himself an out, but he's essentially saying it's scummy that you voted him. Terribly sorry to interrupt your most intimate conversation but what is YOUR opinion on HF? Feel free to answer after calix does if necessary. I have none. I want to lynch him, but that is completely unrelated to whether or not I think he's mafia.
That's fair.
|
On October 05 2016 02:01 Palmar wrote:
I kinda want to bully someone, but I'm also lazy and I need to go soon, so I'm not gonna.
excellent bully targets are jat and superbia. They're both kinda.... here, but not doing much. Which isn't really scummy for either of them, as that's what they do all the time, but we need to make them commit to shit to figure out what they actually think.
I am pretty sure that I have been quire clear on what I think so far. Feel free to bully superbia though. He is a decent target.
Questionable post tbh. you know that to "make me commit to shit" is not the way to get a read on me.
|
On October 05 2016 02:10 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 02:05 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 02:01 Palmar wrote:
I kinda want to bully someone, but I'm also lazy and I need to go soon, so I'm not gonna.
excellent bully targets are jat and superbia. They're both kinda.... here, but not doing much. Which isn't really scummy for either of them, as that's what they do all the time, but we need to make them commit to shit to figure out what they actually think.
I am pretty sure that I have been quire clear on what I think so far. Feel free to bully superbia though. He is a decent target. Questionable post tbh. you know that to "make me commit to shit" is not the way to get a read on me. sure is if you commit wrong, you scum.
Ok, let me put it this way:
What you said is an empty phrase. Because you are not able to make me commit to anything. I will do that whenever I want regardless of my alignment. You know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
