EPTAlso means my reads are well off if two of my top scum-reads flipped town >_>
[M][N] Murder on the Cruise Trip Mafia - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Also means my reads are well off if two of my top scum-reads flipped town >_> | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:17 marvellosity wrote: just listen to other people just like i listened to the doubters about batsnacks if you're town (let's assume that) your point on hf was really silly and the fact no-one could take it seriously should have made you wonder about it, no? Confirmation bias is a hell of a drug, my dude. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
##vote Palmar | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
 | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:25 marvellosity wrote: i'm just going to pretend you said that without a hint of sarcasm  You might not have to pretend. Anything is possible if you try! | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
You said you didn't scum-read him. Now you're claiming that you did scum-read him for that post. You also said he was scummy because he didn't say "I'm town" in his defense - that is literally what you posted in the thread. Someone saying "might as well have fun" has never been scum-indicative. What are you smoking? I don't give a shit if you tried to prevent that, my dude. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
You said at the time that you didn't scum-read him. When I asked now why you voted for someone you didn't scum-read, your answer was that you thought, among other things, that he had scum-claimed and that he was acting like mafia. Plz explain. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:52 NeverUnlucky wrote: It fucking does. What is the relevance of your point? Unless you think I am mafia with Plamar, you are going nowhere. Who said anything about Palmar? I just asked about your batsnacks vote on its own, my dude. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote: Which raises the question: What is the relevance of your point? It's obvious that I think your vote is bad and I'm prying into your stated reasoning vs what you've said before and how they don't actually make sense together. Doesn't take a genius to pick up on that one, pal. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote: They make sense together... they're the same. So it has no relevance. You have no follow-up on this. Saying you don't scum-read someone who you think scum-claimed is not the same. Instead of properly explaining your thought process here so that I can understand it better, you're just trying to shut down this line of conversation by calling it 'irrelevant'. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Veteran is a protective role. It can be roleblocked and killed because Consort is a guaranteed role. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:06 NeverUnlucky wrote: You have yet to show me how this point is relevant, lmao. I don't see any follow-up coming my way. Nice evasion of explaining your contradictory vote. Your vote sucks. You voted for someone that you didn't scum-read and later claimed that he scum-claimed. This was on town. You then try having your cake and eating it too by going "told you so LOL Calix, you so bad, should have listened to me sooner!" and now you refuse to explain yourself. Need me to spoon-feed you any further on how scummy that is? | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
| ||
