|
On October 08 2016 04:29 marvellosity wrote:
don't understand how you don't get the paragraph above the bolded one isn't correct/relevant either
especially as he's more prone to it as mafia (hence providing it as an example).
but it's simply scummy on its own to bitch about a lynch while doing nothing about it.
That argument is inside the bolded paragraph, kindda. You like used the same argument twice, lol.
Why are you so lackadaisical about not having a convincing case enough for others to vote for your scum-read?
|
|
|
Town would be inclined to convince others of voting who they think are the scum.
Your carelessness over the case makes me think you made a case for the sake of making a case so that the annoying townie does not call you out for not doing shit.
|
On October 08 2016 04:34 marvellosity wrote:
funny question given my push on bats was the one convincing enough for town to lynch him and then today i'm the only one actually sustaining any pressure on a scumread
it's kinda surreal tbh.
You made a case on bats? New information to me.
|
On October 08 2016 04:35 marvellosity wrote:
that would make you an idiot, so i guess we're done talking
You are scum.
|
That whining is obviously phony.
|
On October 08 2016 04:46 marvellosity wrote:
nu: 'marv you so unconvincing with trying to get people lynched'
me: uh, i started the train on bats, lots of people followed, argued my lynch near deadline, got my lynch (for good or bad), attacked/made the case on Palmar, questioned him after he had a bit of activity, Palmar failed or refused to answer any of the questions.
nu: oh marv you so unconvincing, you don't try to get people to believe in your case. you scum!
really is brilliant
Yours Truly NU
|
On October 08 2016 04:49 Calix wrote:
This is kind of why I don't think Palmar is scum either. Both of them are harping on about their ~speshul connection~ and how well they know each other, etc etc, so what I'm wondering is why either of them would (as scum) keep drawing attention to this while they are pushing each other.
It's poor play from scum because if one of them gets (mis) lynched then the other one looks absolutely terrible. All for the grand total of...one mislynch!
You'll notice this is a similar - if not identical - argument to what was being used with me at the start of the game when I was attacking NU. That's because it's a similar situation.
In AI 2, Banana and Firebringer did a similar thing D1. They made a 1v1 and said that only one of them was going to be lynched that day and drew a lot of attention to themselves by doing so.
Both were scum (Executioner vs. Godfather).
I did a similar thing as Serial Killer in 3FaS with Unknown.
Like I get that it's hard to conceive that scum would draw attention to themselves from a logical standpoint, but such situations have happened in the past. I won't push this any further as we're going in the wifom grounds.
Also, I get the feeling that Palmar is not pushing Marv. His argument is basically that we should lynch marv when plamar flips. That's not really a push. More "fearmongering" as Koshi would say.
I think I actually find marv more town than Plam in that 1v1.
|
Calix, what do you make of jat's recent posts?
And if you think he is still a mob, who do you see him teamed with?
|
On October 08 2016 05:04 Calix wrote:
I am of the opinion that the majority of the scum are among the less influential low-posters with one active person who is steering the thread in a direction that they want, so the lurkers are my default scum team for pretty much everyone, lol.
I'll look at JAT, one moment.
So 2 of Scott/DDD/Superbia/Koshi (Is he considered a lurkerrr?)/Plamar are scum iyo?
|
On October 08 2016 05:08 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 04:48 marvellosity wrote:
calix, is nu terrible?
if not i'm gonna have to downgrade him he is very prone to ridiculous plots and tinfoiling, and his reads aren't based on anything
Yours Truly NU
|
On October 08 2016 05:09 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 05:08 Palmar wrote:On October 08 2016 04:48 marvellosity wrote:
calix, is nu terrible?
if not i'm gonna have to downgrade him he is very prone to ridiculous plots and tinfoiling, and his reads aren't based on anything Surely not a post with a little relevance?!
Half-Life 3 will come out before Plamar becomes relevant.
|
On October 08 2016 05:08 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 04:48 marvellosity wrote:
calix, is nu terrible?
if not i'm gonna have to downgrade him he is very prone to ridiculous plots and tinfoiling, and his reads aren't based on anything
I'll give Plamar his daily dose of tinfoil.
The HF kill made me wonder why mafia did not kill inside the town circle that had formed D1 (Koshi, Super, Grack, Calix, Oats, me). My tinfoiling senses tell me that it is because there is a deep wolf inside the circle. My logic tells me the mafia are bad players and need to kill the best (by reputation) player in the game.
|
Who are you and where is the real Plamar?
|
On October 08 2016 05:22 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 05:20 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Who are you and where is the real Plamar? wtf are you on about?
"I am being completely reasonable here."
|
On October 08 2016 05:11 Calix wrote:
With regards to JAT...
- Makes a valid point that nobody (myself included) has bothered to make a case against him after Day 1.
- Claims Palmar has not left his mafia range. Seems to think that it is TvS and that the town will make himself obvious.
- Scum-reads Superbia/ Damdred.
- Makes a large post concluding Scott/ Stutters is null.
- Correctly claims that defensiveness is not scum-indicative.
Overall, it's not terrible. I don't think he says anything super-townie/ something mafia would never say but his posts didn't give me the vibe that he was sitting on the sidelines and pushing mafia objectives so I have no complaints.
Vote Damdred with me.
|
Am I wrong to say that you two are starting to tr each other?
|
On October 08 2016 05:35 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 05:26 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Am I wrong to say that you two are starting to tr each other? yes, but to be honest due to tiny brain syndrome, it's probably best you assume you're not.
kk, thanks master Plamar.
|
On October 08 2016 06:53 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 04:37 marvellosity wrote:On October 08 2016 04:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 08 2016 04:34 marvellosity wrote:
funny question given my push on bats was the one convincing enough for town to lynch him and then today i'm the only one actually sustaining any pressure on a scumread
it's kinda surreal tbh. You made a case on bats? New information to me. go check the voting thread. marv votes. oh look then everyone follows. christ. I think there's a pretty big disconnect between how important you were and how important you think you were in yesterday's votes.
Agreed.
Grack, may we be the voice of the downtrodden people by sending Damdred to the morgue.
"Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation, stands vivified and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition. [carves ["NU"] into poster on wall] The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it's my very good honor to meet you and you may call me [NU]."
|
oATS, WHY ARE YOU VOTING SCOTT? i CAN'T REMEMBER YOU TALKING ABOUT HIM EVER BEFORE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
