[M][T] Haunted Mansion 3 - Page 7

On September 11 2016 01:35 Calix wrote:


Uh, you DID say that. You just phrased it as a question which implies that fuba makes that kind of comment every game and never said otherwise until now.

How is it a reaction test? The answer is obvious because a behaviour repeated by a player every game means that they do the behaviour regardless of alignment, thus said behaviour is NAI for them. With this in mind, what were you hoping to get out of that?

On September 11 2016 01:36 Skynx wrote:
Sup mofos, I'll cook eat then sit here for rest of the night.

On September 11 2016 01:43 Calix wrote:


I fail to see how it's a shit case, especially to you, when you made similar points against TT and Grack.

I didn't say "fuba is mafia because he made X comment" - that is only a PART of my case against him. Even if he hadn't made that comment, the rest of my points stand strong.

You didn't ask about wherever it becomes null. (you said 'not scummy' which is not the same thing as 'null')

You haven't said what you were hoping or expecting to get from my reaction.

On September 11 2016 02:39 Calix wrote:


Ew no wtf.

I've already explained that bussing is a horrible fucking strategy for Day 1. Town cred is overrated - nobody gives a shit about who voted for who on Day 1 when it comes to a LYLO situation. I've literally never seen anyone be saved from a lynch because "lol they voted for scum on D1"

Well I am town and I'm defending TT with logical reasoning because scum have no incentive to stick their neck out for a lurker mislynch, so get the fuck off with that 'logic'.

Your last sentence just serves to undermine everything you just said.

0/10, did not like this post whatsoever.

On September 11 2016 03:08 Skynx wrote:
Man p34 is way too long but I'm kinda liking Gracks defence.

HF you seem to be pretty convinced both Grack n TT are mafia which one are we lynching today? And what about the other one if todays lynch flips town?

On September 11 2016 03:10 Calix wrote:


I know I am town. Why would I say "oh yeah I am defending TT so he must be mafia being defended"?

No, I don't know the meta. That doesn't make my point invalid. What are you even arguing here, that since nobody is defending him that he is still scum that the scum aren't trying to defend? Otherwise what is your point with WIFOM?

No idea what you are even calling me out for here with 'talking around posts'.

On September 11 2016 03:27 Calix wrote:


Mafia are not going to stand by and let one of their own die on Day 1. Several people have said "oh I don't find the TT case convincing" so it's not like the case is so airtight that the scum will give up if TT is scum. So the utter lack of scum defending him or pushing for a different train doesn't make sense.

On September 11 2016 03:33 Skynx wrote:
So TT is afk.
HF sr's TT cuz according to meta TT should defend when pressured.
Grack defends TT cuz HF's points is weak.
HF sr's Grack cuz of defending an afk.
Tumble sr's HF cuz his points are invalid.
HF asks everyone to follow him cuz his reads are flawless.

While Shapelog, Super, Palmar are all MIA and posted no content.
fuba, calix and NU are fighting eachother for no reason.
Damdred and Vivax are kinda in and out.

game is hard.

On September 11 2016 03:45 Holyflare wrote:


How do you know those people aren't mafia????

On September 11 2016 03:50 Skynx wrote:

You didn't like his wifom entry. You pressured him and he didn't defend. Those are your arguments around 35-40 am i not right? If not please tell cuz I'm not happy with TT lynch.

On September 10 2016 09:58 Holyflare wrote:
No it's actually not at all. A certain scum read on someone at the start of the game generates a million times more discussion than crap discussions about mechanics, it also helps me make reads on people such as Grack being mafia now and it let's me see who is keen on just skating by and ignoring it.

It's a very strong opening.

But in this case I actually do think that Ticktock is mafia because:

On September 10 2016 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
This mindset is like someone coming in to the game and saying the following:

"Oh, I know Grackaroni posted something boring that I haven't read on Holyflare but Holyflare is mafia for being so certain, trying to say I said things a different way, bla, bla bla."

or

"Oh, I know Grackaroni posted something boring that I haven't read on Holyflare but Holyflare is mafia for <insert reasons that COULD have already been talked about before>"

On September 10 2016 10:15 Holyflare wrote:
Specifically if you call a thing boring you don't normally want to be talking about it.

If you call a thing boring and that you haven't read it you're not going to be posting about it since people could have already made the exact same point and you're wasting your time.

If you call a thing boring and you haven't read it then you aren't going to make your only content filled post on the game about it either.

On September 10 2016 10:19 Holyflare wrote:
My assumption, and it's a very logical assumption to make, is that he actually read/skimmed the entire thread and saw nobody made this point yet and as mafia found a way to look like he was contributing by posting "new information" since mafia love to blend and talk about mechanics.

Then all the other stuff I've posted about him too.

On September 10 2016 09:12 Holyflare wrote:
are you actually being fucking serious?

he has no content to post, he's struggling with his entrance (look at his town game entrance completely different and actually has content?!?!) and his only substantial post of the game is something he specifically says is boring and that he hasn't read:

a) he's not going to post content like that while explaining that he skimmed over content like that it's a fucking bs mindset

b) he's not going to post content like that while explaining that he skimmed over content like that because he might be posting things people have already said.

SO what we have here is that ticktock has LIED about not reading the posts and has actually skimmed and knows what they've said OR he's not read them and then he's posting useless shit as his only content of the game that he said was boring that he knows full well other people COULD have said <------- and if THAT is the case then he's literally posting just for the sake of posting which, again, is a mafia mindset.

Who posts something like that after acknowledging that it already exists but not knowing their content? Mafia.


Perhaps you should actually read his god damn filter from his town game instead of harping on about how it's bs and overplayed when it's literally night and day differences between substantial reads from his town game and simple "Yeah I like that post" bs in this game. It's hilarious that you've actually for some reason looked at two of my previous games and ignored absolutely every other game I've ever played and concluded that I never do these kind of pushes as town when vivax has literally told you 3-4 times that I am this aggressive as either alignment whenever I want to be.

On September 11 2016 03:55 Calix wrote:
I like how HF says that me saying "the scum are allowing a townie to die" is "jumping to a conclusion"

It's a very simple argument to make about the stale TT wagon and lack of resistance.