|
On July 22 2016 00:36 prplhz wrote:
Just start stacking votes on Rels and see where it leads.
Pros: He's scum
Cons: Maybe he's town but then we'll figure out something else
But seriously, we need this to go somewhere other than 6 different directions and Rels could absolutely be scum. So start stacking votes on him.
I don't remember anything you've done this game apart from voting me because "why not". Step it up if you're town
|
On July 22 2016 01:47 emperorchampion wrote:Re-read on Rels: Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 19:47 Rels wrote:
Something needs to be said right now.
We won't ever use the majority vote to end the day early. Barring things like a red check or a fakeclaim ofc.
Longer day is almost always a good thing. More time to solve the game, more time to hear what lynch candidates have to say, no risk of snap lynching a scummy townie that is just AFK.
If you're against that speak now then STFU forever. This is a good point, but just free townie points I suppose. Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 19:58 Rels wrote:On July 20 2016 19:53 Lunaticman wrote:On July 20 2016 19:49 Rels wrote:On July 20 2016 19:44 Lunaticman wrote:On July 20 2016 19:40 Rels wrote:On July 20 2016 19:38 Lunaticman wrote:This post is beyond me, are you saying someone is cheating? No. How much IRL mafia did you play ? About 20 games, with around 8-16 players per game. We usually only played with the standard roles with some flavour such as Medic and Sheriff. But basically vanila mafia. Each game might have lasted around 8 hours per playthrough. I would consider myself an very vocal player but also guilable. Many games have been one or lost because of people spending to much time analyzing my actions. As I always say to myself the silent mafia is the worst mafia... but I digress since this seems very different. How did you play as scum ? I don't think it would be more than subtile differences tbh between me as a townie or mafia, the biggest thing I would say is that as mafia I would probably spend more time analzying the voting tenendcies before speaking. I would also probably try to spend time "mudding the water" raising suspicion on several players at once. I don't think I want to reveal more than that otherwise I would spoil the fun. Usually when I am mafia I make a critical misstake sometimes later in the week but they can be missed... I also have a tenendcy to change play between playthroughs just to not get to predictable. And you if I may ask? How do you play? Why would revealing more about yourself would "spoil the fun" ? I am an active player as either alignment. As town I have the most success finding scum by finding inconsistency in what they say. As scum I try to replicate that to destroy lynchbait. Haven't really seen either this game I think. Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 20:39 Rels wrote:On July 20 2016 20:29 Lunaticman wrote:
Rels since no one else seems to be active right now maybe you could help me explain a bit about the roles.
"Mason and Parity Cop vs Godfather goon and roleblocker
cop and jailkeeper vs Godfather, strongarm and role blocker
Jailkeeper and vigilante vs Godfather, Goon, Strongarm"
I do not recognize the jailkeeper, strong arm and godfather.
Jailkeeper protects a person each night, like a doctor. The difference is that he also roleblocks his target. If his target is a cop for example, the cop will be protected but won't be able to check someone that night. If the jailkeeper target is a mafia killing someone, his target won't be able to carry the kill (IE no mafia kill will happen). Strongarm: during the night, the mafia can kill one person. If their target is protected, the kill won't happen. BUT the strongarm can make it so that the kill will bypass protection. Godfather: a cop can check a person each night to learn his alignment: town or mafia. A godfather will return "town" to a cop acheck. This kinda thing could fall under the posting to seem like contributing, but not really contributing anything banner. Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 20:28 Rels wrote:
Lunatic is very townie for a newbie. Always questioning stuff posted in the thread + posting when there are silence in the thread to give boost to the game. It doesn't seem like it but it actually is hard to continually post as scum, so it's a towntell that he's doing these in his first forum mafia game. I like this post. Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 20:54 Rels wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:02 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:01 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 03:57 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:53 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 03:45 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:34 Skynx wrote:On July 21 2016 03:27 Lunaticman wrote:
[quote]
Based on this I'm putting down my vote for now on EC.
Even if he turns green you will be the next auto lynch. Or rather a blue should check you during the night to save a lynch target.
I will change the vote if someone comes up with a better argument for a d1 lynch. What does emperors alignment has anything to do with mine? I haven't even read him yet. Also you say what i just said is convincing enough for you to vote on ec. But i didn't say anything new or something related to his specific behaviour here. So, thats kind of a shitty vote. Why is he mafia? I think it was a good argument, and votes generate friction, which generates more content. I am totally fine voting for someone if I think the argument is good enough especially on day 1. What I find confusing is why you would demote your own arugment, that is very strange. I actually think he is fighting for his life as a townie, but the day is far from over. I dunno if this makes sense. Why would you vote for a town person? Also I am far from fighting for my life. I am "defending" my self from tumble because his arguments are so weak, they are leading me to think that he might be scum. Voting for people is a common tactic this generates pressure which generates misstakes, you can switch your vote anytime unless I am missing something. Go forth and make mistakes my friend Maybe you should give us a list of our reads so far and some thoughts. You have been chilling far to much. ok. 100% town - aka never lynching.Prplhz Skynx Likely town:Tumblewood emperorchampion Rels Null, no reason to lynch but no real reason to townreadPalmar DCWasabi Koshi Gracaroni null, possibly scum because I haven't really noticed themnnn_thekushmountains Lunaticman Scummy/possibly mafiasicklucker Kruppe the eel Why are SL / Kruppe scummy when they have done nothing at all ? Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 21:02 Rels wrote:
Alright meeting time, see you in a few hours (= please answer my question if I've asked you one earlier. My mind atm:
Town
Lunatic
Skynx
EC
Tumble
Palmar
Scum
Koshi
Kruppe
DC
People missing are null. His town list seems a little at odds, notably the Palmar inclusion. Seems like he's raising some questions about Palmar's town list, but then has him as town. Seems a little odd. Also I've pointed out the thing about his comments on DC, and how he ignored the second post. I think the town thing and palmar + the thing about missing DC's post are the things that I find most off.
Now that the DC's thing is explained, do you still think I'm scum ?
|
On July 22 2016 04:09 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 04:06 emperorchampion wrote:On July 22 2016 04:04 Lunaticman wrote:
Was Haze fake claiming role too? likely I think that entire sequence was very weird. I think either palmar or Haze must be scum based on it. I just wish I was vigilante so I could do it myself.
Bro (/girl) it was a joke
|
On July 22 2016 04:13 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 04:10 Rels wrote:On July 22 2016 04:09 Lunaticman wrote:On July 22 2016 04:06 emperorchampion wrote:On July 22 2016 04:04 Lunaticman wrote:
Was Haze fake claiming role too? likely I think that entire sequence was very weird. I think either palmar or Haze must be scum based on it. I just wish I was vigilante so I could do it myself. Bro (/girl) it was a joke 50% of Palmars posts qualify as "joke" or "troll" to me it just look like a scum with nowhere to hide.
It is non alignment indicative (NAI) for him.
|
On July 21 2016 23:21 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 20:41 Rels wrote:On July 21 2016 02:07 DCWasabi wrote:On July 20 2016 23:34 Tumblewood wrote:On July 20 2016 23:28 emperorchampion wrote:On July 20 2016 23:26 Tumblewood wrote:
actually no
luna's one post is not enough to balance out his previous posting. he's been posting but hardly playing all game. that definitely warrants a scumlean in my book. (this also applies to ec)
also if luna is scum I guess koshi isn't partners because why make a scum case and not go for the cred? shitty mafia move. Actually I've been playing the game a lot, so what's your scum lean based off of? when I say "posting but not playing" I mean you and luna are making a lot of posts but hardly working toward solving the game. OK, but if there is one thing that I learned from my first 2 games, it is that it is pretty nontrivial to "work towards solving the game" on Day 1. I think the first thing that is useful that one can do is get some activity out there day 1, and get your tone established so that you can be more easily read as town by the town moving forwards. I think this is one of the things that I actually did properly as town in the Onegu Best Host Game. Town should be trying to solve the game, but some of the players haven't even posted yet, for example it is 10am local time for me and I just woke-up 30 mins ago and am trying to get caught up. I don't scumlean either of those guys yet, tbh. At the same time, I kind of like this post by Tumble because it is the kind of thing that can help to start more meaningful discussion going and discourage people from posting random banter, otherwise they might get scum-read by this reasoning. I am going to slightly town-lean Tumble because his post leads to a slightly more favorable environment for town. I don't like this post. DC I need you to explain yourself on two things. 1- You say "Town should be trying to solve the game". Now you say it's hard to solve the game at the time of this post because "some of the players haven't even posted yet". BUT the players Tumble are talking about have posted quite a lot already. So this doesn't apply ? What is the motivation that pushed you making this post ? Why do you disagree with Tumble here ? 2 - Why do you don't scumlean either of those guys " yet" ? Cause it seems like yuo plan on scumleaning them later, which doesn't make sense, if they are scummy you should scumlean them now ? 1. The point of my post is that those 2 should not be scum-read for low content posts that early in the game. Like literally it was the first 6 hours they were being scrutinized for. That is still the banter phase and people are establishing their tone. My motivation? Obviously I don't want anybody miss lynched for a stupid reason. I think that should be obvious for town to see... 2. I don't scumlean them "yet" because they haven't done anything to warrant it yet. I was implying that this does not mean that I'm giving them a free pass forever or that I think they're necessarily town (at the time). Will post more on my lunch break, and getting ready for work now but I wanted to respond to this because it was directed at me.
2. OK. Still think it's a weird way to put it. But I can't prove it.
Where exactly do you live ? IE in what timezone ?
1. Tumble point was not that these two had no content. It was that they were trying to look like they wrote something meaningful to appear useful.
|
On July 22 2016 04:16 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 04:14 Rels wrote:On July 22 2016 04:13 Lunaticman wrote:On July 22 2016 04:10 Rels wrote:On July 22 2016 04:09 Lunaticman wrote:On July 22 2016 04:06 emperorchampion wrote:On July 22 2016 04:04 Lunaticman wrote:
Was Haze fake claiming role too? likely I think that entire sequence was very weird. I think either palmar or Haze must be scum based on it. I just wish I was vigilante so I could do it myself. Bro (/girl) it was a joke 50% of Palmars posts qualify as "joke" or "troll" to me it just look like a scum with nowhere to hide. It is non alignment indicative (NAI) for him. So hes just a douche?
=D
|
On July 22 2016 04:17 Tumblewood wrote:
rels I saw a post (or maybe it was two, I can't remember) so you'd better spew town to keep from getting lynched
First, this sentence is not missing something.
Second, why do (or did ?) you think that EC played this game and last game similarly ?
|
On July 22 2016 04:25 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 04:20 Rels wrote:On July 22 2016 04:17 Tumblewood wrote:
rels I saw a post (or maybe it was two, I can't remember) so you'd better spew town to keep from getting lynched First, this sentence is not missing something. Second, why do (or did ?) you think that EC played this game and last game similarly ? do you remember that post from early early d1 last game (two actually) where vorono scumread and voted ec based on two posts he made? I was chilling I'm the obs qt and pissed that people were scumreading vorono and not lynching ec. yesterday I was feeling like a genius because I thought I had caught ec for the same thing but now I'm almost sure he can't be scum.
Alright. The post from last game:
On July 12 2016 09:52 vorono wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2016 09:21 emperorchampion wrote:
Also just wondering, how come you don't feel comfortable leading a lynch? And also what do you mean by "a townie with a name"? i voted you for this post
So you're saying EC have a similar post this game ? Which is it ?
|
On July 22 2016 04:27 Tumblewood wrote:
okay I read DC's filter and content-wise it sucks but that's much less important than mindset for newbies and I think his mindset is town. rels sorry but you're getting lynched today. I don't see anyone who is a better option than you.
I'm reading it and I have the opposite conclusion.
Why are you scumreading me ?
|
On July 22 2016 04:28 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 04:16 Lunaticman wrote:On July 22 2016 04:14 Rels wrote:On July 22 2016 04:13 Lunaticman wrote:On July 22 2016 04:10 Rels wrote:On July 22 2016 04:09 Lunaticman wrote:On July 22 2016 04:06 emperorchampion wrote:On July 22 2016 04:04 Lunaticman wrote:
Was Haze fake claiming role too? likely I think that entire sequence was very weird. I think either palmar or Haze must be scum based on it. I just wish I was vigilante so I could do it myself. Bro (/girl) it was a joke 50% of Palmars posts qualify as "joke" or "troll" to me it just look like a scum with nowhere to hide. It is non alignment indicative (NAI) for him. So hes just a douche? Actually I'm like the nicest guy. Really Like soft and fluffy and fun.
9999999
|
DC have a fair chance being scum. His filter have almost no content BUT all of his big posts are made to feel like they actually have content. A recurring theme these these big posts is "INACTIVE IS DIFFERENT FROM SCUMMY". Look, it comes back very often:
On July 21 2016 02:07 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 23:34 Tumblewood wrote:On July 20 2016 23:28 emperorchampion wrote:On July 20 2016 23:26 Tumblewood wrote:
actually no
luna's one post is not enough to balance out his previous posting. he's been posting but hardly playing all game. that definitely warrants a scumlean in my book. (this also applies to ec)
also if luna is scum I guess koshi isn't partners because why make a scum case and not go for the cred? shitty mafia move. Actually I've been playing the game a lot, so what's your scum lean based off of? when I say "posting but not playing" I mean you and luna are making a lot of posts but hardly working toward solving the game. OK, but if there is one thing that I learned from my first 2 games, it is that it is pretty nontrivial to "work towards solving the game" on Day 1. I think the first thing that is useful that one can do is get some activity out there day 1, and get your tone established so that you can be more easily read as town by the town moving forwards. I think this is one of the things that I actually did properly as town in the Onegu Best Host Game. Town should be trying to solve the game, but some of the players haven't even posted yet, for example it is 10am local time for me and I just woke-up 30 mins ago and am trying to get caught up. I don't scumlean either of those guys yet, tbh. At the same time, I kind of like this post by Tumble because it is the kind of thing that can help to start more meaningful discussion going and discourage people from posting random banter, otherwise they might get scum-read by this reasoning. I am going to slightly town-lean Tumble because his post leads to a slightly more favorable environment for town.
This one doesn't even address the problematic, since Tumble was not attacking Luna and EC for making joke post, but for making "fake contributory" posts.
On July 21 2016 02:15 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 01:58 prplhz wrote:On July 21 2016 01:38 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 01:35 prplhz wrote:On July 21 2016 01:25 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 01:19 prplhz wrote:On July 21 2016 01:14 Lunaticman wrote:
There is a worrying amount of silent players what do you mean by this? who is silent and why is that worrying? I just think the silent mafia is the hardest mafia to beat! They will probably post when I am asleep. But we still need more "reads" why do you think silent mafia are harder to beat? what makes you think they will post when you're asleep when they're not posting now? Because it turns into a guessing game, you should know this. Because they might be on different time zones. Hence my earlier question to americans. but the OP says 10 posts or you're dead so people will post or they will die. problem solved. also, if they don't post because they're in another timezone then time will pass and suddenly they will start posting so it seems like problem will solve itself again. dunno why it's so worrying. and no, i don't know that lurking scum are more worrying. i think active scum are just as worrying because sometimes they turn out to be impossible to kill. maybe because i just played with damdred and he was reasonably active scum and impossible to kill and i didn't realize this until it was too late. This makes sense. Damdred totally fooled me last 2 games as active Mafia. Also, the rules of the game should have people posting when they are awake and able, so it is quite premature to worry about activity, we should be looking at the tone, content, purpose, etc... of what people are posting when they start posting. Noting the people that haven't posted yet is good, not bad, since it will encourages them to post. But, it doesn't mean that they are scum.
Useless.
On July 21 2016 03:45 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 03:10 Lunaticman wrote:
My gut is telling me;
Town:
emperorchampion
Rels
Tumblewood
Koshi
Prplhz
There might be one mafia in there of course, it is to early to say,
A bit scummy:
Skynx
Gracaroni
Kruppe the eel
Palmar
The rest are blanks for me.
DCWasabi
sicklucker
nnn_thekushmountains
How are you reading Kruppe the eel and Palmar as scummy when they haven't posted anything yet. They should be null. What makes you think that they are scummy?
On July 21 2016 03:51 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 03:47 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:45 DCWasabi wrote:On July 21 2016 03:10 Lunaticman wrote:
My gut is telling me;
Town:
emperorchampion
Rels
Tumblewood
Koshi
Prplhz
There might be one mafia in there of course, it is to early to say,
A bit scummy:
Skynx
Gracaroni
Kruppe the eel
Palmar
The rest are blanks for me.
DCWasabi
sicklucker
nnn_thekushmountains
How are you reading Kruppe the eel and Palmar as scummy when they haven't posted anything yet. They should be null. What makes you think that they are scummy? They havent posted yet. That doesn't mean they are Mafia, it just means they are inactive. We could Policy Lynch for inactivity, or we can Lynch somebody we actually are reading as mafia. If they don't get active before the deadline, then host action will take place based on OP. If they wait till the deadline, then post low-content / meaningless things, then we can lynch them on D2 if we think they are Mafia lurking in the shadows. We do want them to be more active, but we don't want to derail the thread throwing darts at empty space.
Useless question to luna + a big post based on luna's answer, yet no conclusion on luna. I don't know what was the point of his question. Pointless questions are a good way to "participate" for scum.
On July 21 2016 04:56 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:20 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
scum
1) Prplhz
2) DCWasabi
6) Rels
7) sicklucker
8) Gracaroni
11) Kruppe the eel
12) Koshi
13) Palmar
Is this 1920's Chicago, or something? No way there are that many Mafia. On a more serious note, I'm going to go Full-Sherlock here and determine that you are Null or Town reading: 3) Skynx 4) Lunaticman 5) emperorchampion 10) Tumblewood yourself Can you post some reasons?
On July 21 2016 04:58 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:56 DCWasabi wrote:On July 21 2016 04:20 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
scum
1) Prplhz
2) DCWasabi
6) Rels
7) sicklucker
8) Gracaroni
11) Kruppe the eel
12) Koshi
13) Palmar
Is this 1920's Chicago, or something? No way there are that many Mafia. On a more serious note, I'm going to go Full-Sherlock here and determine that you are Null or Town reading: 3) Skynx 4) Lunaticman 5) emperorchampion 10) Tumblewood yourself Can you post some reasons? yes I can but I won't because that would take effort and not be that fun.
No reaction on kush answer.
He is a good lynch
I'll read some other filters to see if I prefer someone else. But he is a good lynch.
|
On July 22 2016 04:39 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 04:36 Koshi wrote:On July 22 2016 04:35 Grackaroni wrote:On July 21 2016 23:08 Koshi wrote:I have actually a good reason why Palmar is town: On July 21 2016 04:15 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:02 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:01 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 03:57 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:53 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 03:45 Lunaticman wrote:
[quote]
I think it was a good argument, and votes generate friction, which generates more content. I am totally fine voting for someone if I think the argument is good enough especially on day 1. What I find confusing is why you would demote your own arugment, that is very strange.
I actually think he is fighting for his life as a townie, but the day is far from over. I dunno if this makes sense. Why would you vote for a town person? Also I am far from fighting for my life. I am "defending" my self from tumble because his arguments are so weak, they are leading me to think that he might be scum. Voting for people is a common tactic this generates pressure which generates misstakes, you can switch your vote anytime unless I am missing something. Go forth and make mistakes my friend Maybe you should give us a list of our reads so far and some thoughts. You have been chilling far to much. ok. 100% town - aka never lynching.Prplhz Skynx Likely town:Tumblewood emperorchampion Rels Null, no reason to lynch but no real reason to townreadPalmar DCWasabi Koshi Gracaroni null, possibly scum because I haven't really noticed themnnn_thekushmountains Lunaticman Scummy/possibly mafiasicklucker Kruppe the eel The (better) townreads in this list were really fast and on point. prplhz, EC and Skynx. Would be bad play if Palmar is mafia. Well... Not bad play, but it would hurt mafia agenda. How did you end up townreading Palmar based off a list that was randomly generated? He even put himself as null, but I figured it was a non-role pm reading thing. how the fuck was I supposed to know it was rng? The reasoning is literally in the fucking post you quoted. Seems like a buddying attempt. On a separate note I don't really understood why everyone is townreading prplhz.
++
|
Koshi explain to me how Kruppe is different from last game.
|
On July 22 2016 04:47 prplhz wrote:
when is deadline
In 2h10
|
kush could be anything. I have ONE reason to think he might be town but it is very very bad. So bad I'm afraid saying it.
+ Show Spoiler +On July 21 2016 12:13 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
Actually I rethought this and I'm not confident about those two even. So I'm just going to vote for SL.
CASE AGAINST SL
SL has never been mislynched. So lynching him is a win-win situation for us.
Either he's scum, or he's town and we shit all over his streak.
##vote SL I also think like this often as town to try and solve the game.
|
On July 22 2016 04:47 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2016 04:45 Rels wrote:
Koshi explain to me how Kruppe is different from last game. Try to read his first page. See how he formulates his posts around Vivax and Snickers. Free information pushed in the game. This game there is only secrecy and roleplay. If we want any information we have to drag it out of him. Also the information post he made felt like something he had to make to get people to back off. While in the other game he made posts because he wanted to solve the game. It is very obvious.
Explain to me then because for me it is kinda the same thing. Like his last big post:
On July 22 2016 01:56 Kruppe the Eel wrote:
Aaai! Do not lynch me friends, Kruppe is most innocent! Kruppe solemnly swears!
Kruppe will be most preoccupied due the heat. It is current much too warm to plan a party of friends!
Some ponderings from friendly Kruppe:
Koshi's heart is in the right place. Alas, his mind is not.
Rels' envelope may have been delivered a bit too early. Kruppe observes that Rels' traitorous traits are denoted by a serious tone! Something Rels' lacked when Kruppe had the envelope delivered —worry not friends, Kruppe has many ways to switch its contents!—. Kruppe now ponders on Rels yet is not convinced of either his maliciousness or his innocence yet!
Both Skynx and EmperorChampion should know better! They have observed Kruppe's craftsmanship before! Yet they are firmly opposing Kruppe's party. Ludicrousness!
Kruppe yet ponders more on EmperorChampion. A glimpse of (genuine?) intelligence was observed —by none other than Kruppe himself!— when talking about poor, innocent Kruppe. Yet when confronted by Koshi's plain views, he simply fell back into the herd. For shame!
Traitorous Skynx should know better for certain! Kruppe expects Skynx to have deeper opinions other than defaulting on the mystery behind poorest Kruppe. Something he has even struggled with before! Most recently! Maliciousness indeed.
Kush's opinion is sharp, yet Kruppe argues that his opinion may be driven by a (nefarious?) agenda! Envelopes pending!
Palmar is bedridden. Yet a lazy man is easily underestimated. Kruppe gives a small nod towards Palmar. May he receive his envelope shortly.
He scumread me before but now it's more like null.
Skynx and EC are suspicious for
So he's clearly stating his rea
|
Posted before finishing it but you get what I mean
|
On July 22 2016 04:52 Grackaroni wrote:
Has Rels played a lot of mafia?
Click on my profile.
|
On July 22 2016 04:54 Lunaticman wrote:
I'd be fine lynching Kruppe, Palmar. The others are honestly null reads to me so far.
I could also condone something like: DCWasabi, Prplhz, sicklucker, nnn,thekushmountains.
To me Rels reads like town to much, if he is mafia he sure is fooling me.
Palmar might be town. Kruppe I'm not sure but I'm not seeing the scuminess. kush could be anything but I dont' really want to lynch him today because he usually stays AFK for long periods of time as scum, he's kinda easy to read the later the game goes. SL I forgot he was in the game, but him not doing anything D1 is possible for any alignment, so a lynch on him would be a pure policy. I want to read his filter before ruling him out but since I don't remember anything he's said I don't think I'll find anything interesting.
It's probably gonna be between DC and PRP.
And no worries about me I'm town.
|
Tumble is a possibility too. He voted me for no reason at the moment I came back to the thread. He didn't state any reason for the vote, he could be scum going with the wind. And he left while I was questionning him on his attack on EC earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
