|
On June 25 2016 10:08 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2016 09:54 GlowingBear wrote: I'm pretty comfortable to call quick twist town right at the moment.
I think Artanis pushes on quick twist are kinda unnatural, but it's mostly a gut feel M8 you're not going to get me mislynched no matter how hard you try. Just give up on the plans before you give yourself away.
Art :/ you'll die in 7 days.
Real days.
|
Yeah I'm really confortable with QT being town
|
On June 25 2016 12:23 Damdred wrote: It's interesting only people I'd be happy lynching into today
Tt, sk, Jin, jealous
Emperor im not sure of yet kinda want to put him out of conversation.
But Im not sure why I don't buy the town reads on sk it just doesn't feel or look right to me yet.
You... You don't want to lynch me???
|
On June 25 2016 12:34 Damdred wrote: Not really something tells me that you probably aren't scum and I liked several of your posts.
Problem is all of them besides tt are low hanging fruit so far this game which is bothersome
Movie is starting.
Can you specify which posts you like from me?
|
Hey guys, sorry, I slept almost 18 hours today
|
On June 26 2016 06:30 Jean Valjean wrote: I have only glanced a few pages at random, so do not take this for anything more than it is.
Skynx called out Artanis in a way that I liked. Artanis' response wasn't great.
Damdred said at least one thing that closely resembles the way a human being talks.
GlowingBear's entry post was worse than most other people's.
And the conclusion you take from these notes is...?
|
On June 26 2016 06:20 Damdred wrote: How drunk was gb last night
ROFL not that much.
I'm probably making a catch up post in two or three hours
In the meantime, I think we should vote quicktwist for mayor as I think he might be the towniest here.
We have to organise ourselves to vote the two towniest people since the pardonner is the second one with the most votes.
I actually don't have a second name right now but I'll probably find one after I re read everything.
Also vote me.
|
On June 26 2016 08:53 Damdred wrote: The most interesting thing is besides Tt I think I have solid reasons to tr most people.
Jean is null though. Its going to be a long and hard game it seems. There is one reason to tr Jean but idk could be a smurf
I think he isn't a smurf...
I also think he might be town in this game
|
|
On June 26 2016 09:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Inspector Artanis has proofSlam admits it was his smurf on the first post in the page after.
Inspector Artanis!
What happens if you're mafia?
|
On June 26 2016 10:23 emperorchampion wrote: Not sure why you guys like QT so much for Pres. Despite his seeming towny-ness, he is self admittedly geared towards OMGUS which I think is a bad direction going forwards.
He seems like he is very committed to this notion of "styles", and I suspect that he will try continue to act in a similar manner throughout the game. I think that predictability is a good asset for town, but I don't think that his style of play will be well suited for the president role.
Because I prefer a bad almost-confirmed town than a good not-so-sure-if-he-is-town to decide a lynch and to have double votes
|
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you.
|
On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote: The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership.
Do you have a better option?
|
On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote: The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better.
Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president?
|
On June 26 2016 12:03 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote: The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. why though like, people call koshi bad all the time and it's the same exact thing
Because silently wanting to be elected as mayor is something I would expect from mafia. If I am mafia and I'm seeing town organising themselves - specially when a town player is being elected as president -, I would start to discredit people in order to push my agenda.
It's not like calling Koshi bad. I can call Koshi bad and not vote with him, but if Koshi was the towniest person in the game I would vote him 100% of the times simply because having a bad town mayor is better than risking having a good mayor that could be mafia
|
On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote: The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president?
Emperor, please refer to this. I'm really interested.
|
|
On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote: The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. .
So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right?
I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town.
|
On June 26 2016 12:18 Tumblewood wrote: hell, it plays right into mafia's hand to put someone up for mayor who's bad at scumhunting. it's just as bad to have mafia lynching townies as town lynching townies, only mafia doesn't come under suspicion when town lynches townies.
It definitely isn't.
Remember that Mayor decides day1 lynch and have double votes throughout the whole game. Imagine this catastrophe when we reach LYLO, for example. Double votes in mafia's hand may antecipate town loss. Minus 1 day before LYLO.
Now imagine if it's a townie in the other hand.
It really doesn't matter, guys. We simply have to elect the towniest.
|
On June 26 2016 12:22 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote: The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town. That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice: Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point. Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine. QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far.
I have no problem with your Tumble and QT reads, but I don't understand what you like on Superbia. I went to his filter and I saw a lot of questions with no follow-up to them. Also, I saw him town leaning on Jean Valjean when he had like just 1 post that was null at best. I don't really understand how his posts have been on point.
Also, do you have any idea how Superbia's scum meta is? Because although he might be playing a similar game to his last one, it doesn't necessarily mean he is town if his scum meta is pretty much the same as his mafia meta.
|
|
|
|